Interdisciplinary Synthesis at the Intersection of Branches of Law: General Logical Method of Cognition and Substitution of Analogy
( Pp. 103-109)

Objective. The article substantiates the need to apply interdisciplinary synthesis as a method of cognition in order to use it not only for research purposes, but also in the process of regulation of disputable legal relations, because the study of factual circumstances by the court, their analysis and qualification of the set of established facts is the process of cognition within the framework of the established by law procedure. The purpose of the article is to explain, from the point of view of interdisciplinary synthesis and the need to protect the requirements of fairness and good faith, the progressive legal positions of the court decisions applying the norms of civil law to disputable public legal relations in exceptional cases. Model. The methodological basis of the article is the author's use of methods of synthesis and analysis, description and interpretation; the formation of a legal position on the issue of the possibility of applying civil law institutions to regulate public legal relations and vice versa. Conclusions. In exceptional cases, interdisciplinary synthesis can replace a legislative analogy and an analogy of law. Interdisciplinary synthesis allows to combine into one universal legal mechanism all criteria of good faith, developed to date by international law, legislation and judicial practice for the most effective protection against bad faith behavior of subjects of law. The product of synthesis is also an inseparable connection of the principles of justice and good faith as a dialectical unity of quantitative and qualitative characteristics. The method of legal regulation is the negation, and in relation to the protection of the requirements of the principle of good faith—the negation of bad faith behavior. Framework of the research/possible further use of the results of the scientific work. The results of the article are part of the study of methodological problems of civil and public law research, issues of application of the principles of justice and good faith. Practical importance. The conclusions of the article will be useful when courts consider the tax disputes and the cases on the return of property to state ownership, when it was taken out of state ownership through corruption and (or) abuse of power, in particular, the objects of cultural heritage, ports of interregional importance, nature reserves and other objects of importance to the population of the country. Social consequences. The existence of a method of legal regulation based on the principles of justice and good faith—negation of bad faith behavior—is substantiated. This method allows to the courts and participants of the disputes to apply the principle of good faith as a rule of direct action on the basis of different sources of law (mandatory and recommendatory; regardless of the sphere of legal relations and branch of law regulated by them). Originality/value. The article is addressed to the legal scientific community, legal practitioners, can be useful for students of law faculties at universities.

Sedova Zh. I. Interdisciplinary Synthesis at the Intersection of Branches of Law: General Logical Method of Cognition and Substitution of Analogy // ECONOMIC PROBLEMS AND LEGAL PRACTICE. 2025. Vol. 21. № 2. P. 103-109. (in Russ.) DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2025-21-2-103-109. EDN: NETKAB

Aristotle. The Great Ethics (translated by Miller T.A.). Book One (A) // Philosophical Heritage (Volume Ninety). Works in four volumes. Vol. 4. The Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of Philosophy / translated from Ancient Greek; Ed. by Dovatur A.I. —M.: Publishing House «Mysl», 1983. —830 p.
Aristotle. Topica. // In Philosophical Heritage. Works in four volumes. Vol. 2. Editor of the second volume Mikeladze Z.N., Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Institute of Philosophy, Moscow: —Publishing house «Mysl», 1978.
Biryukov S.V. Denial of law as a theoretical and legal category / Ph: 12.00.01. Omsk State University named after F.M. Dostoevsky. 2009.
Braslavsky R.G. Transformations of the methodological self-determination of sociology in the contexts of disciplinary development of social sciences // Second Davydov Readings. —Moscow: Institute of Sociology, 2014.
Kuznetsova O.A. Norms-principles of the Russian civil law. М., 2006.
Lazarev V.V. Integration of law and implementation of integrative approaches to law in the court decision // Journal of Russian Law. 2017. № 7. Р. 5–18.
Lipchiu N.V., Lipchiu K.I. Methodology of scientific research: textbook. —Krasnodar: KubSAU, 2013. —290 p.
Orekhov A.M. Interdisciplinary synthesis and socio-humanities: to the question of clarifying some concepts and research vectors // Socium and Power. 2018. № 3 (71). P. 91–97.
Perevalov V.D. Theory of state and law: textbook and practical work for bachelor's and specialist's degrees. —5-th ed., revised. and ext. —Moscow : Publishing House Yurait, 2019. —341 p.
Sedova Zh.I. Inadmissibility of violation of the principle of reciprocity as a type of negation of bad faith behavior in law // Science. Education. Modernity / Science. Education. The Present. 2023. № 1. P. 81–86.
Sedova Zh.I. Problems of execution of out-of-court agreement on the application of conciliation procedures concluded between the taxpayer and the tax authority // In collection: Law and business: balancing the legal interests of entrepreneurs, consumers and the state. Collection of materials of the X International scientific-practical conference. Russian State University of Justice. Moscow, 2022. Р. 100–112.
Modern Dictionary of Philosophy / Ed. by V.E. Kemerov and T.H. Kerimov. —4-th ed. updated and supplementary —Moscow: Academic Project; Ekaterinburg: Delovaya Kniga, 2015. —823 p.
Fursov D.A., Kharlamova I.V. Theory of Justice. Moscow: Puplishing House Statute, 2009. V. 1–524 p.
Heidegger M. Time and Being. —Moscow: Respublika, 1993. —446 p.
Hesselink M.V. Principle of good faith. // Bulletin of economic justice of the Russian Federation. 2020. № 8. P. 157–187.
Chestnov I.L. Perspectives and problematic issues of naturalistic jurisprudence // Journal of Russian Law. 2025. № 3. P. 5–18.

interdisciplinary synthesis, method of legal regulation, principle of justice, principle of good faith, normative autonomy of the principle of good faith, analogy..