MULTI-CONCEPTUALITYIN HISTORICAL SCIENCE AND HISTORY TEACHING
( Pp. 9-14)
More about authors
Kamynin Vladimir D.
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The reason for this article was the publication by the publishing house“Yurayt”textbook for universities B.V. Lichman“History of Russia from ancient times to the end of the XIX century”, admitted by the Ministry of education of the Russian Federation as a textbook on the discipline “Domestic history” for students of technical universities. Responding to the appeal of the editor-in-chief of the journal “History and modern worldview” to historians to Express their opinion about history and its interpretations, the author of this article expresses his attitude to the possibility of using multi-conceptuality as a method of studying and teaching history. The article analyzes the methodological issues posed by the authors of the textbook, reveals the features of the use of multi-conceptuality in scientific research and in the teaching of history. The opinion on the main interpretations of historical facts is expressed.
How to Cite:
Kamynin V.D., (2019), MULTI-CONCEPTUALITYIN HISTORICAL SCIENCE AND HISTORY TEACHING. History and Modern Perspectives, 4 => 9-14.
Reference list:
[Alekseev V.V. At the crossroads of epochs: Memoirs of a contemporary and reflections of a historian. Ekaterinburg: AMB Publishing House, 2013. 280 p.]
[Zapariy V.V., Kamynin V.D., Lichman B.V. “On the waves of our memory..”: Formation of dissent in Russian history textbooks (USTU-UPI, early 90’s). Quaestio Rossica. Vol. 7. 2019. No. 1. P. 23-36.]
[Zvereva G.I. Civilizational specificity of Russia: discourse analysis of the new “historiosophy”. Social Sciences and Modernity. 2003. No. 4. P. 88-99.]
[Kamynin V.D., Lichman B.V. “Historical policy” in modern Russia: The Spread of the theory and methodology of teaching multi-conceptuality (tolerant) history of Russia. Socio-Political Sciences. 2019. No. 4. P. 9-13.]
[Lichman B.V. History of Russia from ancient times to the end of the XIX century. 2nd ed. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing house, 2019. 241 p.]
[Mogilnitsky B.G. Some results and prospects of methodological research in Russian historiography. New and Modern History. 1993. No. 3. P. 9-20.]
[Smirnov A.I. Multi-conceptuality in mathematics // Multi-conceptuality in science. Mat. international. science conf., posv. 65th anniversary of prof. B.V. Lichman. Ekaterinburg: UMC UPI publishing House, 2011. P. 84-87.]
[Smykalin A.S. New conceptual approaches to the study of law in modern historical and legal science // Multi-conceptuaityl in science. Mat. international. science сonf., posv. 65th anniversary of prof. B.V. Lichman. Ekaterinburg: UMC UPI Publishing House, 2011. P. 80-84.]
[Sogrin V.V. Twenty years of Russian transformation. 1985-2005: vicissitudes of historiographical pluralism. Social Sciences and Modernity. 2005. No. 1. P. 20-34.]
[Speransky A.V. Multi-conceptuality history and Marxism: problems of theoretical understanding // Multi-conceptuality in science. Mat. international. scienceсonf., posv. 65th anniversary of prof. B.V. Lichman.Ekaterinburg: UMC UPI publishing House, 2011. P. 87-94.]
[Telitsin V.V. The History of Russia from ancient times to the twentieth century a Course of lectures. In 2 ch. // Domestic history. 1998. No. 1. P. 177-182.]
[Tertyshny A.T., Trofimov A.V. Russia: images of the past and meanings of the present. Ekaterinburg: Uralpublishing House un-ta, 2012. 544 p.]
[Zapariy V.V., Kamynin V.D., Lichman B.V. “On the waves of our memory..”: Formation of dissent in Russian history textbooks (USTU-UPI, early 90’s). Quaestio Rossica. Vol. 7. 2019. No. 1. P. 23-36.]
[Zvereva G.I. Civilizational specificity of Russia: discourse analysis of the new “historiosophy”. Social Sciences and Modernity. 2003. No. 4. P. 88-99.]
[Kamynin V.D., Lichman B.V. “Historical policy” in modern Russia: The Spread of the theory and methodology of teaching multi-conceptuality (tolerant) history of Russia. Socio-Political Sciences. 2019. No. 4. P. 9-13.]
[Lichman B.V. History of Russia from ancient times to the end of the XIX century. 2nd ed. Moscow: Yurayt Publishing house, 2019. 241 p.]
[Mogilnitsky B.G. Some results and prospects of methodological research in Russian historiography. New and Modern History. 1993. No. 3. P. 9-20.]
[Smirnov A.I. Multi-conceptuality in mathematics // Multi-conceptuality in science. Mat. international. science conf., posv. 65th anniversary of prof. B.V. Lichman. Ekaterinburg: UMC UPI publishing House, 2011. P. 84-87.]
[Smykalin A.S. New conceptual approaches to the study of law in modern historical and legal science // Multi-conceptuaityl in science. Mat. international. science сonf., posv. 65th anniversary of prof. B.V. Lichman. Ekaterinburg: UMC UPI Publishing House, 2011. P. 80-84.]
[Sogrin V.V. Twenty years of Russian transformation. 1985-2005: vicissitudes of historiographical pluralism. Social Sciences and Modernity. 2005. No. 1. P. 20-34.]
[Speransky A.V. Multi-conceptuality history and Marxism: problems of theoretical understanding // Multi-conceptuality in science. Mat. international. scienceсonf., posv. 65th anniversary of prof. B.V. Lichman.Ekaterinburg: UMC UPI publishing House, 2011. P. 87-94.]
[Telitsin V.V. The History of Russia from ancient times to the twentieth century a Course of lectures. In 2 ch. // Domestic history. 1998. No. 1. P. 177-182.]
[Tertyshny A.T., Trofimov A.V. Russia: images of the past and meanings of the present. Ekaterinburg: Uralpublishing House un-ta, 2012. 544 p.]
Keywords:
multi-conceptuality, interpretation of historical facts, textbook B.V. Lichman.
Related Articles
