THESES FOR DISCUSSION OF THE CONCEPT “PURPOSE, MEANING IN HISTORY - PURPOSE, MEANING IN OUTLOOK - PURPOSE, MEANING IN THE NATIONAL IDEA”
( Pp. 9-12)
More about authors
Lichman Boris V.
doktor istoricheskih nauk, professor, zav. kafedroy istoricheskih disciplin Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, Zasluzhennyy rabotnik Vysshey shkoly RF, chlen Nauchno-metodicheskogo soveta po istorii ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF, prorektor Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, professor kafedry teorii i istorii mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy departamenta mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy Uralskogo gumanitarnogo instituta Uralskogo federalnogo universiteta im. B.N. Elcina
Ural Federal University named after B.N. Yeltsin
Ural Federal University named after B.N. Yeltsin
Abstract:
Abstracts compiled for discussion and debate, and debate can cause only the novelty and categorical judgments. Both are present in the theses. In Russia, the past and history are perceived in unity as undivided, and scientists are trying to find objectivity and truth in the story about the past - history. The theses state that there is no absolute truth in history. History is not an objective past, but a story about the past and, like any story, is subjective. There are many different stories in the world that explain the past. All these stories-truths are compiled according to the worldviews of their authors, and there are many worldviews in the world and they are different in goals. Stories are different. Theses distinguishes between facts of the past and facts in history. The fact of the past is a real event, and the fact in history is explained by the worldview of the author of the story. Different worldviews give different interpretations and assessments to the same facts in history. The interpreters of the past are individuals and organizations of people-the state. According to the state goal - the national idea, the past is studied, the experience necessary for the state leadership of society and people is extracted from it. Different States in history have different interpretations and assessments of the facts of the past. State histories reflect the interests of their States. In the modern world, both man and States have a different conceptual or otherwise multiconceptual history.
How to Cite:
Lichman B.V., (2019), THESES FOR DISCUSSION OF THE CONCEPT “PURPOSE, MEANING IN HISTORY - PURPOSE, MEANING IN OUTLOOK - PURPOSE, MEANING IN THE NATIONAL IDEA”. History and Modern Perspectives, 3 => 9-12.
Reference list:
Vernadskiy V.I. Biosfera i noosfera. M.: Nauka, 1989.
Gumilev L.N. Etnogenez i biosfera Zemli. L., 1989.
Ionov I.N. Rossiyskaya tsivilizatsiya, IX - nachalo XX v.: uchebn. kniga dlya 10-11 kl. obshcheobrazovat. uchrezhdeniy. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1995.
Kartashov A.V. Istoriya Russkoy tserkvi. V 2 ch. M., 1992- 1993.
Munchaev SH.M., Ustinov V.M. Istoriya Rossii: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M., 1998.
Nefedov S.A. Istoriya Rossii. T. 1. Faktornyy analiz. S drevneyshikh vremen do Velikoy smuty. M.: Izd. dom Territoriya budushchego , 2000.
Ferro Mark. Kak rasskazyvayut istoriyu detyam v raznykh stranakh mira. M., 1992.
Gumilev L.N. Etnogenez i biosfera Zemli. L., 1989.
Ionov I.N. Rossiyskaya tsivilizatsiya, IX - nachalo XX v.: uchebn. kniga dlya 10-11 kl. obshcheobrazovat. uchrezhdeniy. M.: Prosveshchenie, 1995.
Kartashov A.V. Istoriya Russkoy tserkvi. V 2 ch. M., 1992- 1993.
Munchaev SH.M., Ustinov V.M. Istoriya Rossii: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M., 1998.
Nefedov S.A. Istoriya Rossii. T. 1. Faktornyy analiz. S drevneyshikh vremen do Velikoy smuty. M.: Izd. dom Territoriya budushchego , 2000.
Ferro Mark. Kak rasskazyvayut istoriyu detyam v raznykh stranakh mira. M., 1992.
