The role of worldview in history and historiography
( Pp. 10-17)

The main purpose of this article is developing a worldview approach to history from the standpoint of the author’s idealistic concept, as well as developing the theory of multi-conceptualism and tolerance B.V. Lichman. The fact that stories are written on the basis of different worldviews has been repeatedly noted in both domestic and foreign historiography (G. Iggres and E. Van). Going beyond the boundaries of European historiography clearly shows the influence of worldview ideas, both on the content of the past, and the method of knowing and creating it. Unification of the past does not occur due to the lack of a unified worldview shared by all. Many pictures of the world inevitably rise the multiplicity of the past. There are several concepts on the basis of which various images of the past are constructed even in the framework of Western civilization. Theory divides historians, but the methodology of studying the events of the past unites. Historians use the existence of reliable facts to interpret various historical processes and various images of the past are already being created at this level. According to the author the decisive influence of worldview on historiography leads to the fact that when changing worldviews, the image of the past created in the framework of the previous worldview changes. Each worldview revolution entails not only socio-political disasters, also it leads to the creation of a new history. Today's history has abandoned its idealistic foundations and is largely based on materialism. This leads to the fact that the engine of history inevitably does not appear to be man, but objective, material forces. Man, only in fact is proclaimed the central figure of the historical process, in fact, he is a puppet of external forces. In order to realize the educational ideal and make a person a true master of history, it is necessary to recognize the creative potential behind it, which underlies historical development. Such an approach can only be idealistic. An important role in the development of such a theory and practice of historiography by the author is played by the worldview, multi-conceptual and tolerant approach developed by B.V. Lichman.

Grigory I.G., (2020), THE ROLE OF WORLDVIEW IN HISTORY AND HISTORIOGRAPHY. History and Modern Perspectives, 1 => 10-17.

Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma. M.: Kuchkovopole, 2016. 416 s.
Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. 808 s.
Vernadskiy V. I. Filosofskie mysli naturalista. M.: Nauka, 1988. 520 s.
Gerasimov G.I. Mirovozzrencheskie osnovy istorii Rossii (seredina XIX - nachalo XX vv.). Tula: Tretiy put , 2019. 528 s.
Gurevich A.YA. O krizise sovremennoy istoricheskoy nauki // Voprosy istorii. 1991. №2-3. S.34.
Dekart P. Sochineniya v 2-kh t. T. 2. M.:Mysl , 1994. 632 s.
Dil tey V. Postroenie istoricheskogo mira v naukakh o dukhe. T.3. - M.: Trikvadrata, 2004. - 419 s.
Zubkov K.I. Mnogoetnichnaya istoriya Rossii v stadial no-evolyutsionnom izmerenii // Istoriko-pedagogicheskie chteniya. 2016. №20-1. S.48-58.
Ivanov Vyach.Vs. Tipologiya yazykov basseyna Amazonki. CHast II: CHislitel nye i schet / Ivanov Vyacheslav Vsevolodovich // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 2005. № 5. S. 3-9.
Iggers G., Van E. Global naya istoriya sovremennoy istoriografii / G. Iggers, E. Van (pri uchastii SupriiMukerdzhi); per. s angl. O. Vorob evoy. Nauch. red. Marina Kukartseva. Moscow: Kanon ROOI Reabilitatsiya , 2012. - 432 s.
Ionov I.N. Istoricheskaya teoriya srednego urovnya i ee sovremennoe znachenie // Lyudi i teksty. Istoricheskiy al manakh. 2016. №8. S.55-81.
Lichman B.V.Mnogokontseptual naya teoriya i metodologiya istorii // Istoriya i sovremennoe mirovozzrenie. 2019. T.1. №2. S.9-13.
Lichman B.V. Tolerantnaya istoriya Rossii. (Mnogokontseptual nost ). Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural skogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava. 2008. 158s.
Lokk Dzh. Sochineniya v 3-kh t. T. I. M., 1985. 621s.
Mirovozzrenie // Filosofiya: Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar . M.: Gardariki. PodredaktsieyA.A. Ivina. 2004. 1072s.
Spirkin A.G. Mirovozzrenie // Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar . M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya. Gl. redaktsiya: L. F. Il ichyev, P. N. Fedoseev, S. M. Kovalyev, V. G. Panov. 1983. 840s.
Fuks A.N. SHkol nye uchebniki po otechestvennoy istorii kak istoriograficheskiy fenomen (konets XVII v. - vtoraya polovina 1930-kh gg.). M. : IIU MGOU, 2017. 420 s.

theory of history, worldview, worldview approach, multi-conception of history, idealism, idealistic approach to history.