History and Modern Perspectives Issue №3 — 2020

The Liberal concept of Russian history
( Pp. 11-19)

Andrey V. Trofimov

DOI: 10.33693/2658-4654/-2020-2-3-11-19

Andrey V. Trofimov
Ural State University of Economics; Syktyvkar State University named after Pitirim Sorokina
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Syktyvkar, Russian Federation

Read text

Abstract:

Historical science in Russia was formed and developed under the influence of European socio-political thought, in which liberalism was understood as an ideology, socio-political movement, a set of democratic institutions, procedures and principles of governance. Liberal historians searched for interrelations between socio-political and economic aspects of historical development, and paid attention to the need to study state, political and cultural history. In line with the liberal paradigm, the stages of human history are considered from the position of priority of personal development, ensuring its individual freedoms, and Russia is considered from the position of a potentially European country, with a catch-up type of development. A liberal view of history presupposes the presence of intellectual polyphony, competition of conceptual explanations. To represent the liberal version of Russian history, the article uses the cognitive capabilities of several concepts existing in the modern historiographic space: «patrimonial state», «totalitarianism», «socio-cultural split», «Russian system», «distribution economy», «catching up development, backwardness», «servile and contractual Russia», «non-modern country». Based on them, a liberal interpretation of the content of various stages of Russian history is presented.

How to Cite:

Andrey V.T., (2020), THE LIBERAL CONCEPT OF RUSSIAN HISTORY. History and Modern Perspectives, 3 => 11-19.

Reference list:

Akhiezer A., Klyamkin I., YAkovenko I. Istoriya Rossii: konets ili novoe nachalo M.: Novoe izdatel stvo, 2008. 464 s.
Bessonova O.E. Razdatochnaya ekonomika Rossii: Evolyutsiya cherez transformatsii. M.: ROSSPEN, 2006. 144 s.
Vasil eva A.O. Patrimonializm kak opredelyayushchiy faktor razvitiya rossiyskogo kapitalizma // Neprikosnovennyy zapas. 2013. № 4. S. 39-52.
Ermolaev I.P. Stanovlenie Rossiyskogo samoderzhaviya. Istoki i usloviya ego formirovaniya: Vzglyad na problemu. Kazan : Izd-vo Kazanskogo universiteta, 2004. 393 s.
Inozemtsev V.L. Nesovremennaya strana. Rossiya v mire XXI veka. M.: Al pina-Pablisher, 2018. 406 s.
Kamenskiy A.B. K probleme vekovoy russkoy otstalosti // Quaestio Rossica. T. 6. 2018. № 1. S. 185-206. .
Lubskiy R.A. Rossiyskaya gosudarstvennost kak predmet kontseptual nogo myshleniya // Filosofiya prava. 2014. № 6. S. 9-13.
Malia M. Sovetskaya tragediya: Istoriya sotsializma v Rossii. 1917-1991. M.: ROSSPEN, 2002. 584 s.
Mironov B.N. Russkaya revolyutsiya 1917 goda v kontekste teoriy revolyutsii // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost . 2013. № 3. S. 106-115.
Obshchestvennaya mysl v Rossii XVIII - nachala XX veka: Entsiklopediya. M., Izdatel stvo Politicheskaya entsiklopediya , 2005. 639 s.
Payps R. Sobstvennost i svoboda. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovaniy, 2000. 394 s.
Payps R. Rossiya pri starom rezhime. M.: Zakharov, 2004. 493 s.
Sidnenko T.I. Russkaya liberal naya istoriografiya i evropeyskaya filosofskaya mysl v kontse XIX - nachale XX veka // Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. 2008. № 72. S. 53-62.
Trubitsin D.V. Rossiya dogovornaya i Rossiya kholopskaya : opyt sotsiologizatsii istoricheskoy kontseptsii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. № 6. 2019. S. 97-107.
Fursov A.I., Pivovarov YU.S. Russkaya sistema kak popytka ponimaniya russkoy istorii // Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2001. № 4. S.37-48.
YAnov A.L. Rossiya i Evropa: v 3-kh kn. Kn. 2. Zagadka nikolaevskoy Rossii. 1825-1855. M.: Novyy khronograf, 2007. 504 s.

Keywords:

the liberal approach, the history of Russia, historiography concepts.