MARXISM IN THE MODERN SYSTEM OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF HISTORY
( Pp. 31-35)
More about authors
Andrey V. Speransky
Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Professor, Honored Worker of Science of the Russian Federation, Head of Center for Political and Socio-Cultural History
Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Institute of History and Archeology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The paper analyses influence of the Marxist methodology on historical researches. The paper shows that during existence of the “state of workers and peasants” in Russia the formation theory prevailed in Soviet historiography and had an unshakable priority in explaining mechanisms of development of the historical process. After collapse of the“communist empire”, Marxism lost its monopoly on the truth, unable to withstand primarilypolitical and ideological attacks. However, the author of paper concludes that due to its scientific validity, ability for creative development and propensity to dialogue with other concepts, Marxism remained in the methodological field of understanding of history, being in the first row of the dominant macro-theories.
How to Cite:
Andrey V.S., (2015), MARXISM IN THE MODERN SYSTEM OF CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF HISTORY. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 31-35.
Reference list:
Volobuev P.V. Vybor putey obshchestvennogo razvitiya: teoriya, istoriya, sovremennost . M.: Politizdat, 1987. 310 s.
Gurevich A.YA. Kul tura i obshchestvo srednevekovoy Evropy glazami sovremennikov. M.: Iskusstvo, 1989. 366 s.
Istoricheskaya nauka i nekotorye problemy sovremennosti. M.: Nauka, 1969. 428 s.
Koval chenko I.D. Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya. M.: Nauka, 2003. 486 s.
Kozlov V.A. Rossiyskaya istoriya. Obzor idey i kontseptsiy, 1992-1995 gody // Svobodnaya mysl . 1996. № 4. S. 104-120.
Milov L.V. Velikorusskiy pakhar i osobennosti rossiyskogo istoricheskogo protsessa. M.: ROSSPEN, 1998. 573 s.
Mogil nitskiy B.G. Nekotorye itogi i perspektivy metodologicheskikh issledovaniy v otechestvennoy istoriografii // Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya. 1993. № 3. S. 9-10.
Mogil nitskiy B.G. Istoriya istoricheskoy mysli KHKH v.: kurs lektsiy. Vyp. I: Krizis istorizma; Vyp. II: Stanovlenie novoy istoricheskoy nauki . Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta, 2003. 178 s.
Pantin I.K., Plimak E.G., KHoros V.G. Revolyutsionnaya traditsiya v Rossii. 1783-2883. M.: Mysl , 1986. 341 s.
Poberezhnikov I.V. Perekhod ot traditsionnogo k industrial nomu obshchestvu. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy modernizatsii. M.: ROSSPEN, 2006. 237 s.
Proskuryakova N.A. Kontseptsii tsivilizatsii i modernizatsii v otechestvennoy istoriografii // Voprosy istorii. 2005. № 7. S. 153-165.
Ramazanov S.P. Problema tsennosti v zarubezhnoy i otechestvennoy marksistkoy metodologii istorii: konfrontatsiya ili poisk dialoga // Metodologicheskie i istoriograficheskie voprosy istoricheskoy nauki: sb. statey. Vyp. 28. Tomsk: Izd-vo TGU, 2007. S. 78-82.
Rogovin V.Z. Byla li al ternativa Trotskizm : vzglyad cherez gody. M.: Terra, 1992. 400 s.
Rogovin V.Z. Vlast i oppozitsii (1928-1933 gg.). M.: Tov-vo ZHurn. Teatr , 1993. 398 s.
Rogovin V.Z. Stalinskiy neonep. M.: B. I., 1994. 382 s.
Rogovin V.Z. Glavnyy vrag Stalina: kak byl ubit Trotskiy. M.: Algoritm, 2017. 239 s.
Selunskaya N.B. Metodicheskoe znanie i professionalizm istorika // Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya. 2004. № 4. S. 24-41.
Semyenov YU.I. Velikaya oktyabr skaya raboche-krest yanskaya Revolyutsiya 1917 g. i vozniknovenie neopolitarizma v SSSR (Rossiya: chto s ney sluchilos v XX veke) // Politarnyy (aziatskiy) sposob proizvodstva: sushchnost i mesto v istorii chelovechestva i Rossii. M., 2008. S. 149-235.
Semennikova L.I. Rossiya v mirovom soobshchestve tsivilizatsiy. M.: KDU, 2003. 749 s.
Simoniya N.A. CHto my postroili M.: Progress, 1991. 432 s.
Sogrin V.V. Istoriya istoricheskoy mysli KHKH veka // Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya. 2004. № 5. S. 153-159.
Speranskiy A.V. Modernizatsiya v Rossii: perekrestok mneniy // Modernizatsiya v usloviyakh osvoeniya vostochnykh regionov Rossii v XVIII-XX vv. Ekaterinburg: Bank kul turnoy informatsii, 2012. S. 27-39.
Filosofskie problemy istoricheskoy nauki. M.: Nauka, 1969. 320 s.
Iggers G. Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to Postmodem Challenge. NewHaven:Wes- leyan University Press,1997. 182 r.
Gurevich A.YA. Kul tura i obshchestvo srednevekovoy Evropy glazami sovremennikov. M.: Iskusstvo, 1989. 366 s.
Istoricheskaya nauka i nekotorye problemy sovremennosti. M.: Nauka, 1969. 428 s.
Koval chenko I.D. Metody istoricheskogo issledovaniya. M.: Nauka, 2003. 486 s.
Kozlov V.A. Rossiyskaya istoriya. Obzor idey i kontseptsiy, 1992-1995 gody // Svobodnaya mysl . 1996. № 4. S. 104-120.
Milov L.V. Velikorusskiy pakhar i osobennosti rossiyskogo istoricheskogo protsessa. M.: ROSSPEN, 1998. 573 s.
Mogil nitskiy B.G. Nekotorye itogi i perspektivy metodologicheskikh issledovaniy v otechestvennoy istoriografii // Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya. 1993. № 3. S. 9-10.
Mogil nitskiy B.G. Istoriya istoricheskoy mysli KHKH v.: kurs lektsiy. Vyp. I: Krizis istorizma; Vyp. II: Stanovlenie novoy istoricheskoy nauki . Tomsk: Izd-vo Tomskogo un-ta, 2003. 178 s.
Pantin I.K., Plimak E.G., KHoros V.G. Revolyutsionnaya traditsiya v Rossii. 1783-2883. M.: Mysl , 1986. 341 s.
Poberezhnikov I.V. Perekhod ot traditsionnogo k industrial nomu obshchestvu. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy modernizatsii. M.: ROSSPEN, 2006. 237 s.
Proskuryakova N.A. Kontseptsii tsivilizatsii i modernizatsii v otechestvennoy istoriografii // Voprosy istorii. 2005. № 7. S. 153-165.
Ramazanov S.P. Problema tsennosti v zarubezhnoy i otechestvennoy marksistkoy metodologii istorii: konfrontatsiya ili poisk dialoga // Metodologicheskie i istoriograficheskie voprosy istoricheskoy nauki: sb. statey. Vyp. 28. Tomsk: Izd-vo TGU, 2007. S. 78-82.
Rogovin V.Z. Byla li al ternativa Trotskizm : vzglyad cherez gody. M.: Terra, 1992. 400 s.
Rogovin V.Z. Vlast i oppozitsii (1928-1933 gg.). M.: Tov-vo ZHurn. Teatr , 1993. 398 s.
Rogovin V.Z. Stalinskiy neonep. M.: B. I., 1994. 382 s.
Rogovin V.Z. Glavnyy vrag Stalina: kak byl ubit Trotskiy. M.: Algoritm, 2017. 239 s.
Selunskaya N.B. Metodicheskoe znanie i professionalizm istorika // Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya. 2004. № 4. S. 24-41.
Semyenov YU.I. Velikaya oktyabr skaya raboche-krest yanskaya Revolyutsiya 1917 g. i vozniknovenie neopolitarizma v SSSR (Rossiya: chto s ney sluchilos v XX veke) // Politarnyy (aziatskiy) sposob proizvodstva: sushchnost i mesto v istorii chelovechestva i Rossii. M., 2008. S. 149-235.
Semennikova L.I. Rossiya v mirovom soobshchestve tsivilizatsiy. M.: KDU, 2003. 749 s.
Simoniya N.A. CHto my postroili M.: Progress, 1991. 432 s.
Sogrin V.V. Istoriya istoricheskoy mysli KHKH veka // Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya. 2004. № 5. S. 153-159.
Speranskiy A.V. Modernizatsiya v Rossii: perekrestok mneniy // Modernizatsiya v usloviyakh osvoeniya vostochnykh regionov Rossii v XVIII-XX vv. Ekaterinburg: Bank kul turnoy informatsii, 2012. S. 27-39.
Filosofskie problemy istoricheskoy nauki. M.: Nauka, 1969. 320 s.
Iggers G. Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to Postmodem Challenge. NewHaven:Wes- leyan University Press,1997. 182 r.
