Definition and Analysis of the Goals of External Participants in the Formation of the Parent Company Project Portfolio
( Pp. 63-75)

More about authors
Sorokina Lyudmila B. aspirant kafedry «Ekonomika i organizaciya proizvodstva»
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Moscow, Russian Federation
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Abstract:
Purpose of research: To show that the practice of functioning of production industries indicates the relevance of conducting pre-project analysis and improving its quality in terms of identifying the interests of all participants in the formation of the project portfolio of the parent company; to improve the identification of conflict situations; to suggest approaches to goal-setting and pre-project analysis of the goals of the subjects of the formation of the project portfolio. The results. The external contour of the subjects influencing the formation of the project portfolio of the parent company is highlighted. Tools for conducting pre-project analysis and determining the objectives of the subjects are proposed. The objectives of the subjects are identified and systematized. A mathematical description of both qualitative and quantitative goals is developed and proposed. Their analysis is carried out and typical conflict situations that arise during the formation of a project portfolio are identified. An approach to resolving the identified conflicts is proposed. The practical significance it is manifested by increasing the accuracy of the formation of a portfolio of projects for the medium and long term, timely identification and resolution of conflict situations and the formation of informed decisions by the manager about the need to expand/modernize/reorganize production.
How to Cite:
Sorokina L.B., (2021), DEFINITION AND ANALYSIS OF THE GOALS OF EXTERNAL PARTICIPANTS IN THE FORMATION OF THE PARENT COMPANY PROJECT PORTFOLIO. Computational Nanotechnology, 2: 63-75. DOI: 10.33693/2313-223X-2021-8-2-63-75
Reference list:
Volochienko V.A., Sorokina L.B. Sovershenstvovanie vzaimosvyazey sub ektov formirovaniya portfelya proektov golovnogo predpriyatiya // Computational nanotechnology. 2020. T. 7. № 1. S. 84-91. DOI: 10.33693/2313-223X-2020-7-1-84-91.
Voropaev V.I., Gel rud YA.D. Matematicheskie modeli upravleniya dlya rukovoditelya i komandy upravleniya proektom. CH. 1 // Upravlenie proektami i programmami. 2014. № 01 (37). C. 62-71.
Gorelik V.A. Teoriya prinyatiya resheniy: uchebnoe posobie dlya magistrantov. M.: MPGU, 2016. 152 s.
Gorelik V.A., Ushakov I.A. Issledovanie operatsiy. M.: Mashinostroenie, 1986. 288 s.
GOST R 54870-2011 Proektnyy menedzhment. Trebovaniya k upravleniyu portfelem proektov .
Zasedanie Pravitel stva: stenogramma. Moskva, 26 maya 2016 g. URL: http://govermment.ru/news/23181/
Zatsepin V. Osobennosti novoy gosudarstvennoy programmy razvitiya oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa // Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii. 2016. T. 23. № 8. S. 75-78.
Mizyun V.A. Intellektual noe upravlenie proizvodstvennymi sistemami i protsessami: printsipy organizatsii i instrumenty. Tol yatti: SNTS RAN, 2012. 214 s.
Mishin V.M. Issledovanie sistem upravleniya: uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: YUNITI-DANA, 2003. 527 s.
Petrosyan M.O. i dr. Bazovye modeli DEA-analiza // Reshetnevskie chteniya. 2017. № 21-2. S. 232-233.
Popov V.N., Kas yanov V.S., Savchenko I.P. Sistemnyy analiz v menedzhmente. M.: KnoRus, 2019. 298 s.
Abubakar S.G. et al. Project Portfolio Management Practices in Nigeria s Construction Industry // Business, Management and Economics Research. 2018. Vol. 6. Issue 6. Pp. 75-84.
Banaszak Z., Bocewicz G. Declarative modeling for production order portfolio scheduling // Foundations of management. 2014. Vol. 6. No. 3. Pp. 7-24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/fman- 2015-0014
Brito A.E.P., Zapata M.I.B. Strategic Planning as an important factor in business management // Business, Management and Economics Research. 2020. Vol. 6. Issue 8. Pp. 99-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32861/bmer.68.99.106. URL: https://arpgweb.com/journal/journal/8 (data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2021).
Hassan A., Cook W. Project portfolio selection under uncertainty: A DEA. methodology using predicted and actual frontiers // Journal of Management Research. 2020. Vol. 12. No. 3. Pp. 58-72. DOI:10.5296/jmr.v12i3.17121.
Santos J.A.N. et al. Development of methodology for implementation of strategic planning - MISP // Journal of Management Production (IJM P). 2014. Vol. 5. No. 1. Pp. 24-44. URL: http://www.ijmp.jor.br (data obrashcheniya: 08.01.2019).
Sorokina L.B. Development of technical and economic characteristics of company project portfolio // Science, Engineering and Business: I Interacademic Conference for Graduate Students and Young Researchers (April 16-17, 2019) Conference Proceedings and Papers (Moscow: BMSTU Publishing House). 2019. Pp. 78-85.
Steinle C., Bruch H., Lawa D. Projektmanagement. FAZ Verlagsbereich Wirtschaftsb cher, 1995. Pp. 136-143. (In Hg.)
Keywords:
productions organization, projects portfolio, parent company, external contour, defining purposes.