FEATURES MODEL OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS IN AUSTRALIA
( Pp. 32-34)
More about authors
Shutilina Olga A.
prepodavatel kafedry teorii i istorii gosudarstva i prava
Tambov State Technical University
Tambov State Technical University
Abstract:
The article examines the tribunals in the Australian administrative law, which function as the main organs of resolution of administrative disputes. Model of the tribunals in Australia is one of the most consistent and comprehensive. The author notes that, although there are highly specialized tribunals that deal with certain types of cases, the characteristic feature of the system is the Australian courts Appeal Tribunal (the Australian Appeals Tribunal), which has extensive jurisdiction over administrative disputes. The Tribunal uses acceptable, easily accessible source of information relating to the operation and practices of the judiciary, which is considered the administrative appeal, and organizes standardized sequential review procedure on the merits
How to Cite:
Shutilina O.A., (2015), FEATURES MODEL OF ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS IN AUSTRALIA. Business in Law, 5 => 32-34.
Reference list:
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977. R. 13
Administrative Review Committee Report: Commonwealth Administrative Review Committee Report. 1971. R. 481
Cane Judicial Review in the Age of Tribunals in Forsyth, Elliott, Javari, Rams den Hill Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance. 2010. R. 589
Creyke Better Decisions and federal tribunals in Australia: Australian Law Reform Commission. 2004. R. 490
Downes Australian Tribunal Reforms. 2007. R. 123
Downes Tribunals in Australia: Their Roles and Responsibilities. Australian Law Reform Commission. 2004. R. 259
Enright Federal Administrative Law Sydney: The Federation Press. 2001. R. 17
Kerr Committee Report. 1971. R. 71 Leggatt Tribunals for Users. 2001. R. 67
Martin The development of state tribunals: Australian Law Reform Commission. 2004. R. 207
McMillan Merit Review and the AAT: The AAT-Twenty Years Forward. 1998. R. 175
Skehill The Impact of the AAT on Commonwealth Administration - A View from the Administration in AIAL The AAT-Twenty Years Forward. 1998. R. 231
Spigelman, McMillan The Ombudsman and the Rule of Law. 2005. R. 189.
Administrative Review Committee Report: Commonwealth Administrative Review Committee Report. 1971. R. 481
Cane Judicial Review in the Age of Tribunals in Forsyth, Elliott, Javari, Rams den Hill Effective Judicial Review: A Cornerstone of Good Governance. 2010. R. 589
Creyke Better Decisions and federal tribunals in Australia: Australian Law Reform Commission. 2004. R. 490
Downes Australian Tribunal Reforms. 2007. R. 123
Downes Tribunals in Australia: Their Roles and Responsibilities. Australian Law Reform Commission. 2004. R. 259
Enright Federal Administrative Law Sydney: The Federation Press. 2001. R. 17
Kerr Committee Report. 1971. R. 71 Leggatt Tribunals for Users. 2001. R. 67
Martin The development of state tribunals: Australian Law Reform Commission. 2004. R. 207
McMillan Merit Review and the AAT: The AAT-Twenty Years Forward. 1998. R. 175
Skehill The Impact of the AAT on Commonwealth Administration - A View from the Administration in AIAL The AAT-Twenty Years Forward. 1998. R. 231
Spigelman, McMillan The Ombudsman and the Rule of Law. 2005. R. 189.
Keywords:
administrative tribunals, The Australian Appeals Tribunal, the substantive revision, a review of the case in court.