DETERMINATION OF THE END OF MISCONDUCT IN BANKRUPTCY AND DELIBERATE BANKRUPTCY
( Pp. 133-137)

This article is devoted to the determination of disputes after the end of crimes and major damage from the crimes under Art. 195 and 196 of the Criminal Code. The lack of unified methods to the definition of the end of these crimes in the law literature makes it difficult to qualify acts as criminal. The consequence of this problem is a small number of prosecution of persons committing criminal facts of bankruptcy. The article comprehensively, from the perspective of civil and criminal law the different approaches of legal doctrine and judicial practice of determining the end of the "crime" of bankruptcies are analyzed. The research was conducted by using of philosophical dialectic methods, analysis, synthesis, hermeneutics and the statistical analysis. Materials of judicial practice of the courts of general jurisdiction, statistics PKU «MIAC Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia», a statistical survey of arbitration managers are served as the empirical base of research. The author concluded to exclude the effects of major damage of the objective side of these crimes. In continuation of this thesis, it is proposed to construct the article 195, 196 of the Criminal Code, as formal. The results obtained in this research can be used while studying criminal law, the development of criminal law. The article is interesting for students, graduate students, applicants, arbitration managers, law enforcement personnel and other individuals interested in criminal bankruptcy.

Ten A.N., (2016), DETERMINATION OF THE END OF MISCONDUCT IN BANKRUPTCY AND DELIBERATE BANKRUPTCY. Business in Law, 5 => 133-137.

Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 № 63-FZ (red. ot 02.06.2016) // SPS Konsul tant
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ (red. ot 23.05.2016) // SPS Konsul tant
Federal nyy zakon ot 26.10.2002 N 127-FZ (red. ot 02.06.2016) O nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve) // SPS Konkusl tant
Federal nyy zakon ot 05.05.2014 № 99-FZ (red. ot 28.11.2015) O vnesenii izmeneniy v glavu 4 chasti pervoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i o priznanii utrativshimi silu otdel nykh polozheniy zakonodatel nykh aktov Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF , 12.05.2014, № 19, st. 2304.
Gulyy A.A. Voprosy kvalifikatsii prednamerennogo bankrotstva po ob ektivnoy storone // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2005. № 1. S. 17
ZHalinskiy A.E O nekotorykh sushchestvennykh protivorechiyakh. O sootnoshenii ugolovnogo i grazhdanskogo prava v sfere ekonomiki / Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1999. №12. S 47.
Kolb B.I. Otvetstvennost za kriminal nye bankrotstva: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2003.
Kuz minov D.A. Krupnyy ushcherb kak priznak sostavov prestupleniy, svyazannykh s bankrotstvom // Nauchnyy vestnik Omskoy akademii MVD Rossii №2(41). 2011. S. 13-16.
Lemyagov A.N. Ob ektivnaya storona prednamerennogo bankrotstva // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . 2008. № 23. S. 24 Malyshev K.I. Istoricheskiy ocherk konkursnogo protsessa. SPB., 1871. S.5.
Mikhalev I.YU. Bankrotstvo i ugolovnyy zakon: dis kand. yurid. Nauk. Vladivostok, 2000.
URL: https://rospravosudie.com/court-sovetskij-rajonnyj-sud-g-samary-samarskaya-oblast-s/act-492522546/
URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/a0b75976-b8fd-481e-bf5a-c214739d96b6
URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/5c73d9f0-a736-4fd3-a86f-3cd1893b72fa Anuradha Sen. The Bankruptcy Laws: Comparing Russia, USA, Canada and UK. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract 912931

criminal bankruptcy, deliberate bankruptcy, illegal actions in bankruptcy., economic crimes.