THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ABOUT EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC LIABILITY
( Pp. 24-27)

On the basis of analysis of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation considers the concept and features of a public liability; It reveals its nature, purpose, relationship to state coercion. An attempt was made to identify the most interesting problems in practice in the application of public liability. Background: Despite the fact that the phenomenon of public liability in domestic science has been paid considerable attention (eg, in the works of D.A. Lipinski, V.A. Kisluhina, I.A. Umnova), she has not lost relevance to this day. A special discussion at the present stage of development of jurisprudence raises questions about the concept, the essence of public liability, as well as problems of its regulation and practical application that can be solved in various ways, including through mechanisms of constitutional proceedings. Materials and Methods: The empirical base of the research were the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation examined the author's procedure, which allowed the conflict to designate certain aspects of public liability, and the main reasons for their occurrence. Results: Systematized the author's approach on the concept and content of public responsibility; marked its conceptual components, the nature of the majority of which are disclosed in the light of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation; characterized by the base and forms of public accountability, as well as factors affecting the procedural mechanisms for its implementation (for example, branch of offenses, procedural features of the production of certain categories of cases, etc.). Conclusions: Generalized signs of public liability, set out in the decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, will bring its detailed definition. Outlined the main problems in the regulation of public liability, and make some proposals for improvement of the Russian legislation

Zherebtsova E.E., Bolgova V.V., (2015), THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ABOUT EVIDENCE OF PUBLIC LIABILITY. Business in Law, 4 => 24-27.

Bolgova V.V. Publichnoe pravo (problemy teorii, metodologii, praktiki): Dis. d-ra yurid. nauk. Tambovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. G.R. Derzhavina. Samara, 2009. 512 s.
ZHerebtsova E.E. Institut sudebnogo konstitutsionnogo kontrolya v mekhanizme obespecheniya edinstva pravovogo prostranstva Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2009. № 9. S. 22-25.
Kislukhin V.A. Vidy yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti: Avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2002. 26 s.
Lipinskiy D.A. O sisteme prava i vidakh yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Pravovedenie. 2003. № 2 (247). S. 27-37.
Popondopulo V.F. Sistema obshchestvennykh otnosheniy i ikh pravovye formy: K voprosu o sisteme prava // Pravovedenie. 2002. №4 (243). S.78-101.
Sklifus S.V. Otvetstvennost publichnoy vlasti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii pered naselenie kak odin iz faktorov ee legitimnosti // Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaystvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2010. №4(4).S. 44-48.
Umnova I.A. Konstitutsionnye osnovy sovremennogo rossiyskogo federalizma. Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. M.: Delo, 1998. 280 s.
YAtsenko O.V. Institut pravovoy otvetstvennosti v publichnom prave: teoreticheskie aspekty // Filosofiya prava. 2007. №2. S. 34-38.
Ofitsial nyy sayt Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // http://www.ksrf.ru

public law, public interest, legal liability, The Constitutional Court, coercion.