DEMAND OBLIGATION AND OBLIGATION WITH UNCERTAIN TERM OF FULFILLMENT: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES
( Pp. 93-100)
More about authors
Dubrovskaya Irina I.
starshiy yurist
JSC «LexKledere consulting»
JSC «LexKledere consulting»
Abstract:
The author investigates demand obligations, determines their legal nature, carries out a benchmarking analysis of demand obligations and obligations with uncertain term of fulfillment, discovers their similarities and differences. Also the author investigates the problems of law enforcement in the presence of the legal regulation of demand obligations and obligations with uncertain term of fulfillment.
How to Cite:
Dubrovskaya I.I., (2016), DEMAND OBLIGATION AND OBLIGATION WITH UNCERTAIN TERM OF FULFILLMENT: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES. Business in Law, 3 => 93-100.
Reference list:
Dubrovskaya I.I. Pravovaya priroda vostrebovaniya e ego kvalifitsiruyushchie priznaki // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2016. S. 124 - 127;
Dzhimbeeva D.V. Kollizionnye voprosy regulirovaniya obyazatel stv vsledstvie neosnovatel nogo obogashcheniya po rossiyskomu pravu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2015. S. 120 - 127.
Rzhaksenskiy S.I. O ponyatii razumnogo sroka v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2015. S. 110-114.
Golevinskiy V. O proiskhozhdenii i delenii obyazatel stv. Sochinenie. Varshava, 1872. S. 174; Pobedonostsev K. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Sochinenie. Dogovory i obyazatel stva. M., 1880. S. 7. - 3 t.; Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (v 2 ch.). Po ispravlennomu i dopolnennomu. M., 2003. S. 179; Tuzov D.O. Nichtozhnost i osporimost yuridicheskoy sdelki: pandektnoe uchenie i sovremennoe pravo. M., 2006. S. 15 - 16, 27 - 28;
Vas kovskiy E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava. M. 2003. S. 167; SHershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1995. S. 121. - 1 t.;
Kuznetsova L.V. Sdelki, sovershennye pod usloviem // Sdelki: problemy teorii i praktiki: Sbornik statey / red. M.A. Rozhkova. M., 2008. S. 198 - 238; Vasnev V.V. Priroda uslovnogo obyazatel stva do razresheniya otlagatel nogo usloviya // Vestnik VAS RF. 2012. № 12. S. 23 - 58;
Sarbash S.V. Ispolnenie dogovornogo obyazatel stva. M., 2005. S. 321;
Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (v 2 ch.). Po ispravlennomu i dopolnennomu. M., 2003. S. 425;
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1994. № 32. St. 3301;
Golevinskiy V. O proiskhozhdenii i delenii obyazatel stv. Sochinenie. Varshava, 1872. S. 193;
Pobedonostsev K.P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. CHast tret ya: Dogovory i obyazatel stva. M., 1880. S. 17;
Dernburg G. Pandekty. Obyazatel stvennoe pravo: v 2-kh t. M., 1911. S. 93. - 2 t.;
Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M., 2001. S. 255;
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 04.02.2016 № F08-9628/2015 po delu № A32-18252/2015. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/12a33359-687d-4845-8933-094025178fe6 (data obrashcheniya 24.04.2016); postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda TSentral nogo okruga ot 29.01.2015 № F10-4663/2014 po delu № A36-2000/2014. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/d26c4a25-f473-4755-88e7-65632b6fb1e1 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015)
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 24.04.2015 № F04-17166/2015 po delu № A45-17456/2014. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/2a72dde4-feca-4cb2-a83d-5dd432dc0789 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast vtoraya). Federal nyy zakon ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1996. № 5. St. 410;
Postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 05.09.2006 po delu № A79-16222/2005. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base AVV;n 19836;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 048FBB879DF814A2FC4A225E3EED7434;rnd 0.5376797390636057 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 06.11.2013 № VAS-13437/13 po delu № A40-119312/12. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base ARB;n 362111;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 2674717D5089B5ABD7698535B52FEA71;rnd 0.15068319719284773 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Postanovlenie CHetyrnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 22.02.2012 po delu № A52-2980/2011. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS014;n 18449;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts F302672F5C334AF742569BD659434527;rnd 0.40137675777077675http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS014;n 18449;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts F302672F5C334AF742569BD659434527;rnd 0.40137675777077675 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Postanovlenie FAS TSentral nogo okruga ot 27.08.2013 po delu № A35-10354/2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/a7e9a57c-c2a4-44bf-9398-f29a3c78fd76/A35-10354-2012 20130827 Reshenija 20i 20postanovlenija.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015). Opredeleniem VAS RF ot 02.12.2013 g. № VAS-16810/13 v peredache nadzornoy zhaloby na ukazannyy sudebnyy akt bylo otkazano;
Postanovlenie Pervogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 02.09.2009 po delu № A43-6709/2009. URL: http://base.consultant.ru /cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS001;n 18946;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 751EC9C17886C0FF1C4428BC060C7558;rnd 0.44387411582283676 (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Opredelenie VAS RF № VAS-16681/12 ot 13.12.2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/ad7ccecc-61fc-43de-b114-8bf8771d9f7e/A56-6400-2012 20121213 Opredelenie.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 12.07.2013 po delu №A41-41280/2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/b42d07ac-2409-4a97-92c4-7a665d2b53a7/A41-41280-2012 20130712 Reshenija 20i 20postanovlenija.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 11.01.2000 № 49 Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem norm o neosnovatel nom obogashchenii // Vestnik VAS RF. 2000. № 3.
Dzhimbeeva D.V. Kollizionnye voprosy regulirovaniya obyazatel stv vsledstvie neosnovatel nogo obogashcheniya po rossiyskomu pravu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2015. S. 120 - 127.
Rzhaksenskiy S.I. O ponyatii razumnogo sroka v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2015. S. 110-114.
Golevinskiy V. O proiskhozhdenii i delenii obyazatel stv. Sochinenie. Varshava, 1872. S. 174; Pobedonostsev K. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Sochinenie. Dogovory i obyazatel stva. M., 1880. S. 7. - 3 t.; Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (v 2 ch.). Po ispravlennomu i dopolnennomu. M., 2003. S. 179; Tuzov D.O. Nichtozhnost i osporimost yuridicheskoy sdelki: pandektnoe uchenie i sovremennoe pravo. M., 2006. S. 15 - 16, 27 - 28;
Vas kovskiy E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava. M. 2003. S. 167; SHershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1995. S. 121. - 1 t.;
Kuznetsova L.V. Sdelki, sovershennye pod usloviem // Sdelki: problemy teorii i praktiki: Sbornik statey / red. M.A. Rozhkova. M., 2008. S. 198 - 238; Vasnev V.V. Priroda uslovnogo obyazatel stva do razresheniya otlagatel nogo usloviya // Vestnik VAS RF. 2012. № 12. S. 23 - 58;
Sarbash S.V. Ispolnenie dogovornogo obyazatel stva. M., 2005. S. 321;
Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (v 2 ch.). Po ispravlennomu i dopolnennomu. M., 2003. S. 425;
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1994. № 32. St. 3301;
Golevinskiy V. O proiskhozhdenii i delenii obyazatel stv. Sochinenie. Varshava, 1872. S. 193;
Pobedonostsev K.P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. CHast tret ya: Dogovory i obyazatel stva. M., 1880. S. 17;
Dernburg G. Pandekty. Obyazatel stvennoe pravo: v 2-kh t. M., 1911. S. 93. - 2 t.;
Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M., 2001. S. 255;
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 04.02.2016 № F08-9628/2015 po delu № A32-18252/2015. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/12a33359-687d-4845-8933-094025178fe6 (data obrashcheniya 24.04.2016); postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda TSentral nogo okruga ot 29.01.2015 № F10-4663/2014 po delu № A36-2000/2014. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/d26c4a25-f473-4755-88e7-65632b6fb1e1 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015)
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 24.04.2015 № F04-17166/2015 po delu № A45-17456/2014. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/2a72dde4-feca-4cb2-a83d-5dd432dc0789 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast vtoraya). Federal nyy zakon ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1996. № 5. St. 410;
Postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 05.09.2006 po delu № A79-16222/2005. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base AVV;n 19836;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 048FBB879DF814A2FC4A225E3EED7434;rnd 0.5376797390636057 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 06.11.2013 № VAS-13437/13 po delu № A40-119312/12. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base ARB;n 362111;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 2674717D5089B5ABD7698535B52FEA71;rnd 0.15068319719284773 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Postanovlenie CHetyrnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 22.02.2012 po delu № A52-2980/2011. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS014;n 18449;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts F302672F5C334AF742569BD659434527;rnd 0.40137675777077675http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS014;n 18449;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts F302672F5C334AF742569BD659434527;rnd 0.40137675777077675 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Postanovlenie FAS TSentral nogo okruga ot 27.08.2013 po delu № A35-10354/2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/a7e9a57c-c2a4-44bf-9398-f29a3c78fd76/A35-10354-2012 20130827 Reshenija 20i 20postanovlenija.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015). Opredeleniem VAS RF ot 02.12.2013 g. № VAS-16810/13 v peredache nadzornoy zhaloby na ukazannyy sudebnyy akt bylo otkazano;
Postanovlenie Pervogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 02.09.2009 po delu № A43-6709/2009. URL: http://base.consultant.ru /cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS001;n 18946;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 751EC9C17886C0FF1C4428BC060C7558;rnd 0.44387411582283676 (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Opredelenie VAS RF № VAS-16681/12 ot 13.12.2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/ad7ccecc-61fc-43de-b114-8bf8771d9f7e/A56-6400-2012 20121213 Opredelenie.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 12.07.2013 po delu №A41-41280/2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/b42d07ac-2409-4a97-92c4-7a665d2b53a7/A41-41280-2012 20130712 Reshenija 20i 20postanovlenija.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 11.01.2000 № 49 Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem norm o neosnovatel nom obogashchenii // Vestnik VAS RF. 2000. № 3.
Keywords:
the obligation, withdrawal, time, unjust enrichment, potestative condition, legal fact, analysis, enforcement.
Related Articles
1. CIVIL LAW, HOUSING LAW, FAMILY LAW, INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW Pages: 12-14 Issue №4029
Some regulations on correct application «obligation» term to alimentary legal relationships in Russian Federation
the obligation
the entitled person
alimony
Show more
OTHER Pages: 122-126 Issue №2286
The legal fact as an image of circumstance Reality
legal fact
legal knowledge
competition
to prove
image
Show more
15. FINANCE, CASH CIRCULATION AND CREDIT, ACCOUNTING, FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC FORECASTING Pages: 141-143 Issue №4210
Systemic approach for assessment of projects based on public-private partnership
PPP
public-private partnership
investment project
analysis
project financing
Show more
7. Criminal law and criminology; Criminal enforcement law Pages: 151-156 Issue №15895
A retrospective analysis of the legislative and enforcement practices of anti-corruption
corruption
retrospective
law enforcement officers
legislation
law enforcement
Show more
11. ECONOMICS AND NATIONAL ECONOMY MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, MARKETING, MANAGEMENT Pages: 136-141 Issue №4641
Evaluation and analysis the development of enterprise institute in the economic system
Institute of business
medium and small enterprise
region
rating
analysis
Show more
5. CIVIL LAW; ENTREPRENEURIAL LAW; FAMILY LAW; INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW; Civil procedure arbitration procedure Pages: 124-127 Issue №6998
Legal nature of demand and its qualitative characteristics
the obligation
time
withdrawal
potestative condition
performance
Show more
9. THEORY AND HISTORY OF LAW AND STATE; HISTORY OF LAW AND STATE TEACHINGS 12.00.01 Pages: 224-227 Issue №19146
FORMATION OF FACTUAL SYSTEMS IN THE THEORY OF LAW (ON THE EXAMPLE OF CONTRACT LAW)
legal fact
factual composition
factual system
factual premise
Show more
11. LEGAL SUPPORT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITIES Pages: 171-177 Issue №7765
STATE CONTROL OVER ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY: LEGISLATIVE AND DOCTRINAL APPROACHES
control
supervision
check
experts
the risk-based approach
Show more
5. CIVIL LAW; ENTREPRENEURIAL LAW; FAMILY LAW; INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW; Civil procedure arbitration procedure Pages: 119-122 Issue №9149
Notarial acts as the basis of occurrence of procedural relations
legal fact
notarial acts
writ proceedings
simplified production
protest of a bill
Show more
6. THEORY AND HISTORY OF STATE AND LAW, HISTORICAL STUDIES OF LAW AND STATE (12.00.01) Pages: 171-174 Issue №18933
Functional Interconnections of Factual Systems Elements
legal fact
factual composition
factual system
functional connection
factual premise
Show more
