DEMAND OBLIGATION AND OBLIGATION WITH UNCERTAIN TERM OF FULFILLMENT: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES
( Pp. 93-100)

The author investigates demand obligations, determines their legal nature, carries out a benchmarking analysis of demand obligations and obligations with uncertain term of fulfillment, discovers their similarities and differences. Also the author investigates the problems of law enforcement in the presence of the legal regulation of demand obligations and obligations with uncertain term of fulfillment.

Dubrovskaya I.I., (2016), DEMAND OBLIGATION AND OBLIGATION WITH UNCERTAIN TERM OF FULFILLMENT: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES. Business in Law, 3 => 93-100.

Dubrovskaya I.I. Pravovaya priroda vostrebovaniya e ego kvalifitsiruyushchie priznaki // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2016. S. 124 - 127;
Dzhimbeeva D.V. Kollizionnye voprosy regulirovaniya obyazatel stv vsledstvie neosnovatel nogo obogashcheniya po rossiyskomu pravu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2015. S. 120 - 127.
Rzhaksenskiy S.I. O ponyatii razumnogo sroka v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2015. S. 110-114.
Golevinskiy V. O proiskhozhdenii i delenii obyazatel stv. Sochinenie. Varshava, 1872. S. 174; Pobedonostsev K. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Sochinenie. Dogovory i obyazatel stva. M., 1880. S. 7. - 3 t.; Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (v 2 ch.). Po ispravlennomu i dopolnennomu. M., 2003. S. 179; Tuzov D.O. Nichtozhnost i osporimost yuridicheskoy sdelki: pandektnoe uchenie i sovremennoe pravo. M., 2006. S. 15 - 16, 27 - 28;
Vas kovskiy E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava. M. 2003. S. 167; SHershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1995. S. 121. - 1 t.;
Kuznetsova L.V. Sdelki, sovershennye pod usloviem // Sdelki: problemy teorii i praktiki: Sbornik statey / red. M.A. Rozhkova. M., 2008. S. 198 - 238; Vasnev V.V. Priroda uslovnogo obyazatel stva do razresheniya otlagatel nogo usloviya // Vestnik VAS RF. 2012. № 12. S. 23 - 58;
Sarbash S.V. Ispolnenie dogovornogo obyazatel stva. M., 2005. S. 321;
Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (v 2 ch.). Po ispravlennomu i dopolnennomu. M., 2003. S. 425;
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1994. № 32. St. 3301;
Golevinskiy V. O proiskhozhdenii i delenii obyazatel stv. Sochinenie. Varshava, 1872. S. 193;
Pobedonostsev K.P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. CHast tret ya: Dogovory i obyazatel stva. M., 1880. S. 17;
Dernburg G. Pandekty. Obyazatel stvennoe pravo: v 2-kh t. M., 1911. S. 93. - 2 t.;
Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M., 2001. S. 255;
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 04.02.2016 № F08-9628/2015 po delu № A32-18252/2015. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/12a33359-687d-4845-8933-094025178fe6 (data obrashcheniya 24.04.2016); postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda TSentral nogo okruga ot 29.01.2015 № F10-4663/2014 po delu № A36-2000/2014. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/d26c4a25-f473-4755-88e7-65632b6fb1e1 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015)
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 24.04.2015 № F04-17166/2015 po delu № A45-17456/2014. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/2a72dde4-feca-4cb2-a83d-5dd432dc0789 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast vtoraya). Federal nyy zakon ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1996. № 5. St. 410;
Postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 05.09.2006 po delu № A79-16222/2005. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base AVV;n 19836;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 048FBB879DF814A2FC4A225E3EED7434;rnd 0.5376797390636057 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 06.11.2013 № VAS-13437/13 po delu № A40-119312/12. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base ARB;n 362111;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 2674717D5089B5ABD7698535B52FEA71;rnd 0.15068319719284773 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Postanovlenie CHetyrnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 22.02.2012 po delu № A52-2980/2011. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS014;n 18449;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts F302672F5C334AF742569BD659434527;rnd 0.40137675777077675http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS014;n 18449;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts F302672F5C334AF742569BD659434527;rnd 0.40137675777077675 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Postanovlenie FAS TSentral nogo okruga ot 27.08.2013 po delu № A35-10354/2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/a7e9a57c-c2a4-44bf-9398-f29a3c78fd76/A35-10354-2012 20130827 Reshenija 20i 20postanovlenija.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015). Opredeleniem VAS RF ot 02.12.2013 g. № VAS-16810/13 v peredache nadzornoy zhaloby na ukazannyy sudebnyy akt bylo otkazano;
Postanovlenie Pervogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 02.09.2009 po delu № A43-6709/2009. URL: http://base.consultant.ru /cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS001;n 18946;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 751EC9C17886C0FF1C4428BC060C7558;rnd 0.44387411582283676 (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Opredelenie VAS RF № VAS-16681/12 ot 13.12.2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/ad7ccecc-61fc-43de-b114-8bf8771d9f7e/A56-6400-2012 20121213 Opredelenie.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 12.07.2013 po delu №A41-41280/2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/b42d07ac-2409-4a97-92c4-7a665d2b53a7/A41-41280-2012 20130712 Reshenija 20i 20postanovlenija.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 11.01.2000 № 49 Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem norm o neosnovatel nom obogashchenii // Vestnik VAS RF. 2000. № 3.

the obligation, withdrawal, time, unjust enrichment, potestative condition, legal fact, analysis, enforcement.