DEMAND OBLIGATION AND OBLIGATION WITH UNCERTAIN TERM OF FULFILLMENT: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES
( Pp. 93-100)
More about authors
Dubrovskaya Irina I.
starshiy yurist
JSC «LexKledere consulting»
JSC «LexKledere consulting»
Abstract:
The author investigates demand obligations, determines their legal nature, carries out a benchmarking analysis of demand obligations and obligations with uncertain term of fulfillment, discovers their similarities and differences. Also the author investigates the problems of law enforcement in the presence of the legal regulation of demand obligations and obligations with uncertain term of fulfillment.
How to Cite:
Dubrovskaya I.I., (2016), DEMAND OBLIGATION AND OBLIGATION WITH UNCERTAIN TERM OF FULFILLMENT: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES. Business in Law, 3 => 93-100.
Reference list:
Dubrovskaya I.I. Pravovaya priroda vostrebovaniya e ego kvalifitsiruyushchie priznaki // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2016. S. 124 - 127;
Dzhimbeeva D.V. Kollizionnye voprosy regulirovaniya obyazatel stv vsledstvie neosnovatel nogo obogashcheniya po rossiyskomu pravu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2015. S. 120 - 127.
Rzhaksenskiy S.I. O ponyatii razumnogo sroka v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2015. S. 110-114.
Golevinskiy V. O proiskhozhdenii i delenii obyazatel stv. Sochinenie. Varshava, 1872. S. 174; Pobedonostsev K. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Sochinenie. Dogovory i obyazatel stva. M., 1880. S. 7. - 3 t.; Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (v 2 ch.). Po ispravlennomu i dopolnennomu. M., 2003. S. 179; Tuzov D.O. Nichtozhnost i osporimost yuridicheskoy sdelki: pandektnoe uchenie i sovremennoe pravo. M., 2006. S. 15 - 16, 27 - 28;
Vas kovskiy E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava. M. 2003. S. 167; SHershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1995. S. 121. - 1 t.;
Kuznetsova L.V. Sdelki, sovershennye pod usloviem // Sdelki: problemy teorii i praktiki: Sbornik statey / red. M.A. Rozhkova. M., 2008. S. 198 - 238; Vasnev V.V. Priroda uslovnogo obyazatel stva do razresheniya otlagatel nogo usloviya // Vestnik VAS RF. 2012. № 12. S. 23 - 58;
Sarbash S.V. Ispolnenie dogovornogo obyazatel stva. M., 2005. S. 321;
Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (v 2 ch.). Po ispravlennomu i dopolnennomu. M., 2003. S. 425;
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1994. № 32. St. 3301;
Golevinskiy V. O proiskhozhdenii i delenii obyazatel stv. Sochinenie. Varshava, 1872. S. 193;
Pobedonostsev K.P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. CHast tret ya: Dogovory i obyazatel stva. M., 1880. S. 17;
Dernburg G. Pandekty. Obyazatel stvennoe pravo: v 2-kh t. M., 1911. S. 93. - 2 t.;
Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M., 2001. S. 255;
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 04.02.2016 № F08-9628/2015 po delu № A32-18252/2015. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/12a33359-687d-4845-8933-094025178fe6 (data obrashcheniya 24.04.2016); postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda TSentral nogo okruga ot 29.01.2015 № F10-4663/2014 po delu № A36-2000/2014. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/d26c4a25-f473-4755-88e7-65632b6fb1e1 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015)
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 24.04.2015 № F04-17166/2015 po delu № A45-17456/2014. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/2a72dde4-feca-4cb2-a83d-5dd432dc0789 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast vtoraya). Federal nyy zakon ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1996. № 5. St. 410;
Postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 05.09.2006 po delu № A79-16222/2005. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base AVV;n 19836;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 048FBB879DF814A2FC4A225E3EED7434;rnd 0.5376797390636057 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 06.11.2013 № VAS-13437/13 po delu № A40-119312/12. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base ARB;n 362111;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 2674717D5089B5ABD7698535B52FEA71;rnd 0.15068319719284773 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Postanovlenie CHetyrnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 22.02.2012 po delu № A52-2980/2011. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS014;n 18449;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts F302672F5C334AF742569BD659434527;rnd 0.40137675777077675http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS014;n 18449;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts F302672F5C334AF742569BD659434527;rnd 0.40137675777077675 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Postanovlenie FAS TSentral nogo okruga ot 27.08.2013 po delu № A35-10354/2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/a7e9a57c-c2a4-44bf-9398-f29a3c78fd76/A35-10354-2012 20130827 Reshenija 20i 20postanovlenija.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015). Opredeleniem VAS RF ot 02.12.2013 g. № VAS-16810/13 v peredache nadzornoy zhaloby na ukazannyy sudebnyy akt bylo otkazano;
Postanovlenie Pervogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 02.09.2009 po delu № A43-6709/2009. URL: http://base.consultant.ru /cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS001;n 18946;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 751EC9C17886C0FF1C4428BC060C7558;rnd 0.44387411582283676 (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Opredelenie VAS RF № VAS-16681/12 ot 13.12.2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/ad7ccecc-61fc-43de-b114-8bf8771d9f7e/A56-6400-2012 20121213 Opredelenie.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 12.07.2013 po delu №A41-41280/2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/b42d07ac-2409-4a97-92c4-7a665d2b53a7/A41-41280-2012 20130712 Reshenija 20i 20postanovlenija.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 11.01.2000 № 49 Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem norm o neosnovatel nom obogashchenii // Vestnik VAS RF. 2000. № 3.
Dzhimbeeva D.V. Kollizionnye voprosy regulirovaniya obyazatel stv vsledstvie neosnovatel nogo obogashcheniya po rossiyskomu pravu // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2015. S. 120 - 127.
Rzhaksenskiy S.I. O ponyatii razumnogo sroka v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. Vyp. № 4. 2015. S. 110-114.
Golevinskiy V. O proiskhozhdenii i delenii obyazatel stv. Sochinenie. Varshava, 1872. S. 174; Pobedonostsev K. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. Sochinenie. Dogovory i obyazatel stva. M., 1880. S. 7. - 3 t.; Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (v 2 ch.). Po ispravlennomu i dopolnennomu. M., 2003. S. 179; Tuzov D.O. Nichtozhnost i osporimost yuridicheskoy sdelki: pandektnoe uchenie i sovremennoe pravo. M., 2006. S. 15 - 16, 27 - 28;
Vas kovskiy E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava. M. 2003. S. 167; SHershenevich G.F. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo prava. M., 1995. S. 121. - 1 t.;
Kuznetsova L.V. Sdelki, sovershennye pod usloviem // Sdelki: problemy teorii i praktiki: Sbornik statey / red. M.A. Rozhkova. M., 2008. S. 198 - 238; Vasnev V.V. Priroda uslovnogo obyazatel stva do razresheniya otlagatel nogo usloviya // Vestnik VAS RF. 2012. № 12. S. 23 - 58;
Sarbash S.V. Ispolnenie dogovornogo obyazatel stva. M., 2005. S. 321;
Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo (v 2 ch.). Po ispravlennomu i dopolnennomu. M., 2003. S. 425;
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya) ot 30.11.1994 № 51-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1994. № 32. St. 3301;
Golevinskiy V. O proiskhozhdenii i delenii obyazatel stv. Sochinenie. Varshava, 1872. S. 193;
Pobedonostsev K.P. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava. CHast tret ya: Dogovory i obyazatel stva. M., 1880. S. 17;
Dernburg G. Pandekty. Obyazatel stvennoe pravo: v 2-kh t. M., 1911. S. 93. - 2 t.;
Gribanov V.P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav. M., 2001. S. 255;
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 04.02.2016 № F08-9628/2015 po delu № A32-18252/2015. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/12a33359-687d-4845-8933-094025178fe6 (data obrashcheniya 24.04.2016); postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda TSentral nogo okruga ot 29.01.2015 № F10-4663/2014 po delu № A36-2000/2014. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/d26c4a25-f473-4755-88e7-65632b6fb1e1 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015)
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 24.04.2015 № F04-17166/2015 po delu № A45-17456/2014. URL: http://kad.arbitr.ru/Card/2a72dde4-feca-4cb2-a83d-5dd432dc0789 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast vtoraya). Federal nyy zakon ot 26.01.1996 № 14-FZ // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. 1996. № 5. St. 410;
Postanovlenie FAS Volgo-Vyatskogo okruga ot 05.09.2006 po delu № A79-16222/2005. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base AVV;n 19836;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 048FBB879DF814A2FC4A225E3EED7434;rnd 0.5376797390636057 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 06.11.2013 № VAS-13437/13 po delu № A40-119312/12. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base ARB;n 362111;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 2674717D5089B5ABD7698535B52FEA71;rnd 0.15068319719284773 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Postanovlenie CHetyrnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 22.02.2012 po delu № A52-2980/2011. URL: http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS014;n 18449;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts F302672F5C334AF742569BD659434527;rnd 0.40137675777077675http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS014;n 18449;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts F302672F5C334AF742569BD659434527;rnd 0.40137675777077675 (data obrashcheniya 07.07.2015);
Postanovlenie FAS TSentral nogo okruga ot 27.08.2013 po delu № A35-10354/2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/a7e9a57c-c2a4-44bf-9398-f29a3c78fd76/A35-10354-2012 20130827 Reshenija 20i 20postanovlenija.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015). Opredeleniem VAS RF ot 02.12.2013 g. № VAS-16810/13 v peredache nadzornoy zhaloby na ukazannyy sudebnyy akt bylo otkazano;
Postanovlenie Pervogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 02.09.2009 po delu № A43-6709/2009. URL: http://base.consultant.ru /cons/cgi/online.cgi req doc;base RAPS001;n 18946;div ARB;mb LAW;opt 1;ts 751EC9C17886C0FF1C4428BC060C7558;rnd 0.44387411582283676 (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Opredelenie VAS RF № VAS-16681/12 ot 13.12.2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/ad7ccecc-61fc-43de-b114-8bf8771d9f7e/A56-6400-2012 20121213 Opredelenie.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Postanovlenie FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 12.07.2013 po delu №A41-41280/2012. URL: https://kad.arbitr.ru/PdfDocument/b42d07ac-2409-4a97-92c4-7a665d2b53a7/A41-41280-2012 20130712 Reshenija 20i 20postanovlenija.pdf (data obrashcheniya 11.08.2015);
Informatsionnoe pis mo Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 11.01.2000 № 49 Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sporov, svyazannykh s primeneniem norm o neosnovatel nom obogashchenii // Vestnik VAS RF. 2000. № 3.
Keywords:
the obligation, withdrawal, time, unjust enrichment, potestative condition, legal fact, analysis, enforcement.
Related Articles
1. CIVIL LAW, HOUSING LAW, FAMILY LAW, INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW Pages: 12-14 Issue №4029
Some regulations on correct application «obligation» term to alimentary legal relationships in Russian Federation
the obligation
the entitled person
alimony
Show more
Mathematical and Software of Computеrs, Complexes and Computer Networks Pages: 26-35 DOI: 10.33693/2313-223X-2023-10-2-26-35 Issue №23034
Analysis of the Algorithms of the Constituent Parts of the Compiler and its Optimization
compiler
program code
optimization
algorithm
analysis
Show more
1. THEORETICAL AND HISTORICAL LEGAL SCIENCES (5.1.1.) Pages: 29-33 Issue №22584
The Main Approaches to the Definition of the Concept of "Legal Fact"
legal fact
concept of a legal fact
objectification of a legal fact
legal qualification
model of a legal fact
Show more
5.1.1. THEORY AND HISTORY LAW Pages: 25-29 DOI: 10.33693/2541-8025-2022-18-1-25-29 Issue №20468
Fixing of Legal Facts as a Way of Their Objectivation in Legal Validity
legal fact
operation of law
realization of law
fixation of a legal fact
objectification of a legal fact
Show more
2. CIVIL LAW, HOUSING LAW, FAMILY LAW Pages: 13-16 Issue №2928
MECHANISM OF CIVIL-LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PARTIES TO THE PRINCIPAL CONTRACT AND SUBCONTRACT IN THE SPHERE OF TRANSFER OF PROPERTY FOR TEMPORARY POSSESSION AND USE
temporary possession and use of
the obligation
responsibility
sublease
the subcontract
Show more
1. Constitutional law; Constitutional judicial process; Municipal law Pages: 24-27 Issue №11343
THE FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS AND ITS VALUE IN THE RESEARCH OF THE LEGAL PHENOMENA
function
analysis
a public authority
functional unity
Show more
1. Constitutional law; Constitutional judicial process; Municipal law Pages: 25-28 Issue №5584
THE VARIETY OF SPECIAL LEGAL THE PERSONALITY
legal status of the person
people
citizen
Supplement
withdrawal
Show more
1. THEORY AND HISTORY LAW (5.1.1.) Pages: 43-47 Issue №22137
Evolution of Concepts on the Nature of Relationship of a Legal Fact with Legal Consequences
legal fact
legal relations
thetic connection
theory of legal facts
evolution of the theory of legal facts
Show more
3. Political culture and ideologies Pages: 30-38 Issue №11740
THE RESEARCH OF LEGAL AWARENESS IN WESTERN SOCIOCULTURAL DISCOURSE: THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL BASICS
right
consciousness
awareness
society
culture
Show more
1. SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF DOCTOR OF SCIENCE, PROFESSOR ELAGIN A.G. Pages: 20-23 Issue №6840
The activities of internal Affairs bodies (police) to combat extremism in the preparation and the holding of public events
extremism
the bodies of internal Affairs
police
the opposition
public event
Show more
