ENTREPRENEURIAL FREEDOM IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DECISION OF THE KOMI CONSTITUTIONAL COURT CONCERNING THE CASE OF THE TRANSPORT GROUP «CONFIDENCE»
( Pp. 262-266)
More about authors
Ruzlyaev Mikhail Yu.
aspirant kafedry gosudarstvenno-pravovyh disciplin
Penza State University
Penza State University
Abstract:
The article deals with entrepreneurial freedom as guaranteed by the Russian Constitution of 1993. The analysed case of the transport group «Confidence» highlights a double conflict, where the question of classic public body’s intrusion into the sphere of an individual constitutional liberty is aggravated by the latent conflict of bearers of the same constitutional right (=entrepreneurial freedom), namely two groups of businessmen, involved in the same kind of commercial activity. The author criticises the controversial decision of the Komi Constitutional Court for having failed to properly assess both the public and private law dimensions of the analysed case.
How to Cite:
Ruzlyaev M.Y., (2016), ENTREPRENEURIAL FREEDOM IN THE CONTEXT OF THE DECISION OF THE KOMI CONSTITUTIONAL COURT CONCERNING THE CASE OF THE TRANSPORT GROUP «CONFIDENCE». Business in Law, 2 => 262-266.
Reference list:
Bezrukov A. Konstitutsionnye (ustavnye) sudy sub ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii v usloviyakh modernizatsii gosudarstvennogo upravleniya// Vestnik MGU (Upravlenie).- 2013.- № 2.- C.21-31
Brezhnev O.V. Institut konstitutsionnoy zhaloby v sub ektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii: normativnye modeli i praktika ikh realizatsii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2013. №9. S.58-63
Gataullin A. YUridicheskaya priroda pravovykh pozitsiy konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii// Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.- 2012.- №6.
Goshulyak V.V. Grazhdane i ikh ob edineniya kak sub ekty prava obrashcheniya v konstitutsionnye (ustavnye) sudy sub ektov RF: nedostatki pravovogo regulirovaniya// Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.- 2013.- №6.- C. 38-40
Daydzhest operativnoy informatsii. Akty konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya sub ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2010, №1, s.12-18
Savchenko S. Osobennosti konstitutsionnogo (ustavnogo) pravosudiya v sub ektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii// Zakon i pravo.- 2013.- №11.- C. 9-16
KHabibullina G. Printsip sbalansirovannosti publichnykh i chastnykh interesov v praktike konstitutsionnykh i ustavnykh sudov sub ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii// Rossiyskaya yustitsiya- 2013.- №6.- C. 40-42
Jellinek G., System der subjektiven ffentlichen Rechte. Freiburg: Mohr/Siebeck, 1892
Brezhnev O.V. Institut konstitutsionnoy zhaloby v sub ektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii: normativnye modeli i praktika ikh realizatsii // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal noe pravo. 2013. №9. S.58-63
Gataullin A. YUridicheskaya priroda pravovykh pozitsiy konstitutsionnykh (ustavnykh) sudov sub ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii// Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.- 2012.- №6.
Goshulyak V.V. Grazhdane i ikh ob edineniya kak sub ekty prava obrashcheniya v konstitutsionnye (ustavnye) sudy sub ektov RF: nedostatki pravovogo regulirovaniya// Rossiyskaya yustitsiya.- 2013.- №6.- C. 38-40
Daydzhest operativnoy informatsii. Akty konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya sub ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 2010, №1, s.12-18
Savchenko S. Osobennosti konstitutsionnogo (ustavnogo) pravosudiya v sub ektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii// Zakon i pravo.- 2013.- №11.- C. 9-16
KHabibullina G. Printsip sbalansirovannosti publichnykh i chastnykh interesov v praktike konstitutsionnykh i ustavnykh sudov sub ektov Rossiyskoy Federatsii// Rossiyskaya yustitsiya- 2013.- №6.- C. 40-42
Jellinek G., System der subjektiven ffentlichen Rechte. Freiburg: Mohr/Siebeck, 1892
Keywords:
constitutional law, constitutional justice, public law, private law, competition constitutional rights.
