Public safety as complex object of a crime
( Pp. 84-87)

The question of opportunity reference of public safety to complex objects of a crime is considered in article. On the basis of the analysis of provisions of criminal law science and law-enforcement practice the conclusion that complex character of the relations of public safety is caused by the general danger is drawn. As the basis of inclusion of the public relations in a complex of public safety the fact of direct criminal legal protection of such relations within a crime opposes the public safety which is defined with all elements of corpus delicti. The consequence of complex nature of object of a crime for qualification of crimes shouldn't concern the public relations which are directly not entering a complex of public safety, though indirectly guaranteed within public safety. The drawn conclusions matter as for judgment of public safety as object of a crime, and for law-enforcement activity

Drozhzhina E.A., (2015), PUBLIC SAFETY AS COMPLEX OBJECT OF A CRIME. Business in Law, 2 => 84-87.

Agapov P.V. Banditizm: sotsial no-politicheskoe, kriminologicheskoe i ugolovno-pravovoe issledovanie. Saratov: SYUI MVD Rossii, 2002. 152 s.
Evdokimov A.A. Narushenie spetsial nykh pravil bezopasnosti v ugolovnom prave Rossii. M.: Prospekt, 2012. 152 s.
Zamoskovtsev P.V. O mnogoob ektnosti prestupnykh posyagatel stv // Problemy bor by s prestupnost yu: sb. nauch. trudov. Omsk. 1978. S. 3 - 16.
Komissarov V.S. Terrorizm, banditizm, zakhvat zalozhnika i drugie tyazhkie prestupleniya protiv bezopasnosti obshchestva. Po novomu UK. M.: Krosna-Leks, 1997. 159 s.
Lopatina T. M. Ob osobennosti ob ekta prestupleniya v sfere komp yuternoy informatsii // Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2006, №1, S. 160
Obshchestvennaya bezopasnost i eye zakonodatel noe obespechenie: materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. 19 - 20 aprelya 2001 g. Astrakhan : Izd-vo AGTU, 2001. 244 s.
Pavlik M.YU. Terroristicheskiy akt, zakhvat zalozhnika, banditizm: voprosy teorii i praktiki. SPb.: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2011. 372 s.
Smigov V. I. Kudryashov V. N. Analiz razvitiya ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva ob otvetstvennosti za nezakonnyy oborot oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv v kak neobkhodimoe uslovie ego sovershenstvovaniya // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 2008, S. 198-199
Stashis V.V., Panov N.I. Neposredstvennyy ob ekt i ego znachenie dlya kvalifikatsii prestupleniy // Problemy pravovedeniya. Vyp. 50. Kiev, 1989. S. 83 - 91.
Tatsiy V.YA. Ob ekt i predmet prestupleniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave, KHar kov: Vyshcha shkola, 1988. 198 s.
Gardner J., Anderson T. Criminal Law, Belmont, Wadsworth Learning, 2012. 512 p.
Klotter J. Criminal Law, Waltham, Elsevier, 2013. 840 p.

criminal law, the object of the crime, public safety, a comprehensive object of the crime, qualification of crimes.