IMPERATIVENESS OF LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS
( Pp. 115-119)
More about authors
Zabrodin Dmitriy M.
aspirant kafedry teorii gosudarstva i prava, yurist
«YUST» Law Firm associate; Moscow state law University named after O. E. Kutafin
«YUST» Law Firm associate; Moscow state law University named after O. E. Kutafin
Abstract:
The article deals with the peremptory feature of presumptions in law, in virtue of which presumptions in law are applied (used) regardless of the will of participants of legal relationship, court or other persons, if all of the statutory conditions of their action complied (applied, used). The author sees the urgency of this problem in the fact that, despite the evidence of this attribute, up-dated legislation sometimes ignores and regulates legal relations without presumptions in law, but by corresponding structures, the use of which doesn`t correspond with the framework of General theory of law and legal practice. As an example, the article examines the rule of para. 2 section 2 of article 51 of the Сivil Сode of the Russian Federation: a person who relies on the data of the unified state register of legal entities, shall be entitled to assume that these facts are corresponded to the actual circumstances. The author believes that this enactment is an incorrectly formulated legal presumption, in which the legislator did not take into account peremptory feature of presumption in law that may entail the possibility of incorrect application of this enactment and abuse of law.
How to Cite:
Zabrodin D.M., (2016), IMPERATIVENESS OF LEGAL PRESUMPTIONS. Business in Law, 2 => 115-119.
Reference list:
Babaev V.K. Prezumptsii v sovetskom prave. Gor kiy. 1974. - 124 s.
Bulaevskiy B.A. K voprosu o konkurentsii prezumptsiy // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2012. № 10. S. 39-47 (SPS Konsul tantPlyus ).
Bulaevskiy B.A. K voprosu o ponyatii prezumptsiy v prave // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2010. № 3. S. 63-71 (SPS Konsul tantPlyus ).
Bulaevskiy B.A. Prezumptsii kak sredstva pravovoy okhrany interesov uchastnikov grazhdanskikh pravootnosheniy: monografiya. M.: Institut zakonodatel stva i sravnitel nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel stve RF. 2013. - 240 s. (SPS Konsul tantPlyus ).
Zabrodin D.M. Gruppovye iski v arbitrazhnom protsesse Rossii: problema edinogo pravootnosheniya // Zakon. 2013. № 12. S. 156-162.
Zabrodin D.M. K voprosu o sushchnosti pravovykh prezumptsiy // Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii Sudebnaya reforma v Rossii: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee (Kutafinskie chteniya). Sektsiya teorii gosudarstva i prava, 25-27 noyabrya 2014 g. / pod nauch. red. T.N. Rad ko. Sost.: A.V. Kornev, S.V. Lipen . - M.: Izdatel skiy tsentr Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA). 2015. S. 168-175.
Zabrodin D.M. Pravovye prezumptsii kak sredstva preodoleniya probelov v zakonodatel stve // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve : yuridicheskiy zhurnal. M. № 2. 2016. S. 60-66.
Ioffe O.S., SHargorodskiy M.D. Voprosy teorii prava. M. 1961. - 381 s.
Kaminskaya V.I. Uchenie o pravovykh prezumptsiyakh v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: 1948. - 132 s.
Lazarev V.V. Probely v prave i puti ikh ustraneniya. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura . 1974. - 184 s.
Meyer D.I. O yuridicheskikh vymyslakh i predpolozheniyakh, o skrytykh i pritvornykh deystviyakh. Kazan . 1854. - 129 s.
Oygenzikht V.A. Prezumptsii v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. Dushanbe: Irfon. 1976. - 190 c.
Smirnov A.V., Kalinovskiy K.B. Prezumptsii v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2008. № 4. S. 68-74.
Strogovich M.S. Uchenie o material noy istine v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: 1947. - 276 s.
Bulaevskiy B.A. K voprosu o konkurentsii prezumptsiy // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2012. № 10. S. 39-47 (SPS Konsul tantPlyus ).
Bulaevskiy B.A. K voprosu o ponyatii prezumptsiy v prave // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2010. № 3. S. 63-71 (SPS Konsul tantPlyus ).
Bulaevskiy B.A. Prezumptsii kak sredstva pravovoy okhrany interesov uchastnikov grazhdanskikh pravootnosheniy: monografiya. M.: Institut zakonodatel stva i sravnitel nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel stve RF. 2013. - 240 s. (SPS Konsul tantPlyus ).
Zabrodin D.M. Gruppovye iski v arbitrazhnom protsesse Rossii: problema edinogo pravootnosheniya // Zakon. 2013. № 12. S. 156-162.
Zabrodin D.M. K voprosu o sushchnosti pravovykh prezumptsiy // Materialy VII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii Sudebnaya reforma v Rossii: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee (Kutafinskie chteniya). Sektsiya teorii gosudarstva i prava, 25-27 noyabrya 2014 g. / pod nauch. red. T.N. Rad ko. Sost.: A.V. Kornev, S.V. Lipen . - M.: Izdatel skiy tsentr Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA). 2015. S. 168-175.
Zabrodin D.M. Pravovye prezumptsii kak sredstva preodoleniya probelov v zakonodatel stve // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve : yuridicheskiy zhurnal. M. № 2. 2016. S. 60-66.
Ioffe O.S., SHargorodskiy M.D. Voprosy teorii prava. M. 1961. - 381 s.
Kaminskaya V.I. Uchenie o pravovykh prezumptsiyakh v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: 1948. - 132 s.
Lazarev V.V. Probely v prave i puti ikh ustraneniya. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura . 1974. - 184 s.
Meyer D.I. O yuridicheskikh vymyslakh i predpolozheniyakh, o skrytykh i pritvornykh deystviyakh. Kazan . 1854. - 129 s.
Oygenzikht V.A. Prezumptsii v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave. Dushanbe: Irfon. 1976. - 190 c.
Smirnov A.V., Kalinovskiy K.B. Prezumptsii v ugolovnom protsesse // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. 2008. № 4. S. 68-74.
Strogovich M.S. Uchenie o material noy istine v ugolovnom protsesse. M.: 1947. - 276 s.
Keywords:
legal presumption of, the property is peremptory legal presumptions, enforcement, presumption of authenticity of the information in to EGRUL.
