SOME PROBLEMS OF EFFICIENCY OF THE CREDITORS’ INTERESTS CRIMINAL DEFENSE WHEN CRIMES, IMPEDING PROPERTIES PRESERVATION, ARE COMMITTING
( Pp. 131-136)
More about authors
Geyko Pavel P.
advokat, soiskatel uchenoy stepeni, k. yu. n.
Moscow city Advocate Board; Kutafin Moscow State Legal Academy (MSLA)
Moscow city Advocate Board; Kutafin Moscow State Legal Academy (MSLA)
Abstract:
The paper discusses some questions regarding to efficiency of the creditors’ interests criminal defense, when crimes are committing. On the example of some norms of the Criminal Code of the RF providing liability for impeding properties preservation, the author analyses dependence of reference of criminal acts to factors with formal nature.
How to Cite:
Geyko P.P., (2015), SOME PROBLEMS OF EFFICIENCY OF THE CREDITORS’ INTERESTS CRIMINAL DEFENSE WHEN CRIMES, IMPEDING PROPERTIES PRESERVATION, ARE COMMITTING. Business in Law, 1 => 131-136.
Reference list:
Geyko P.P. O neobkhodimosti vvedeniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za sokrytie imushchestva, podlezhashchego vzyskaniyu // Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomiki: rossiyskiy i evropeyskiy opyt: materialy sovmestnogo rossiysko-germanskogo kruglogo stola, Moskva, 19 noyabrya 2013 g. / otv. red. A.I. Rarog, I.A. Klepitskiy. - M.: Izdatel skiy tsentr Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYUA), 2014.
Geyko P.P. Osnovnye ponyatiya (kategorii) i opredelenie prestupleniy, protivodeystvuyushchikh sokhrannosti imushchestva, podlezhashchego vzyskaniyu / Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 2014, №6.
Grigor ev V.A. Sokrytie denezhnykh sredstv libo imushchestva organizatsii ili individual nogo predprinimatelya, za schet kotorykh dolzhno proizvodit sya vzyskanie nalogov i (ili) sborov. Istochnik SPS Konsul tant Plyus.
Klepitskiy I.A. Sistema khozyaystvennykh prestupleniy. - M.: Statut, 2005.
Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po vyyavleniyu i rassledovaniyu prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh stat ey 177 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii (zlostnoe uklonenie ot pogasheniya kreditorskoy zadolzhennosti) quot; (utv. FSSP Rossii 21.08.2013 N 04-12) / Istochnik - SPS Konsul tant Plyus.
Morozova YU.V. Obstanovka soversheniya prestupleniya kak obyazatel nyy priznak ob ektivnoy storony sostava prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo ch. 1 st. 195 UK RF / Rossiyskiy sledovatel , 2013, № 11.
Pastukhov I., YAni P. Sokrytie imushchestva nalogoplatel shchika ot prinuditel nogo vzyskaniya: nachalo i okonchanie / Zakonnost quot;, 2007, №5.
Prozumentov L., Makhno E. Nepravomernye deystviya pri bankrotstve / Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. № 6.
Turov D.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za nepravomernye deystviya pri bankrotstve. / Obshchestvo i pravo, 2008, №2.
Tyunin V.I. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. - M: YUrlitinform, 2012.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Osobennaya chast : Uchebnik. Izd. vtoroe, ispr. i dop. M.: Kontrakt; Infra-M, 2009. S. 284.
Lezhnin R.A. Problemy kvalifikatsii sokrytiya denezhnykh sredstv i imushchestva, za schyet kotorogo dolzhno proizvodit sya vzyskanie nalogov i sborov. quot;Biznes v zakone quot;, 2007, №3.
Geyko P.P. Osnovnye ponyatiya (kategorii) i opredelenie prestupleniy, protivodeystvuyushchikh sokhrannosti imushchestva, podlezhashchego vzyskaniyu / Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve, 2014, №6.
Grigor ev V.A. Sokrytie denezhnykh sredstv libo imushchestva organizatsii ili individual nogo predprinimatelya, za schet kotorykh dolzhno proizvodit sya vzyskanie nalogov i (ili) sborov. Istochnik SPS Konsul tant Plyus.
Klepitskiy I.A. Sistema khozyaystvennykh prestupleniy. - M.: Statut, 2005.
Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po vyyavleniyu i rassledovaniyu prestupleniy, predusmotrennykh stat ey 177 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii (zlostnoe uklonenie ot pogasheniya kreditorskoy zadolzhennosti) quot; (utv. FSSP Rossii 21.08.2013 N 04-12) / Istochnik - SPS Konsul tant Plyus.
Morozova YU.V. Obstanovka soversheniya prestupleniya kak obyazatel nyy priznak ob ektivnoy storony sostava prestupleniya, predusmotrennogo ch. 1 st. 195 UK RF / Rossiyskiy sledovatel , 2013, № 11.
Pastukhov I., YAni P. Sokrytie imushchestva nalogoplatel shchika ot prinuditel nogo vzyskaniya: nachalo i okonchanie / Zakonnost quot;, 2007, №5.
Prozumentov L., Makhno E. Nepravomernye deystviya pri bankrotstve / Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009. № 6.
Turov D.A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za nepravomernye deystviya pri bankrotstve. / Obshchestvo i pravo, 2008, №2.
Tyunin V.I. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoy deyatel nosti: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. - M: YUrlitinform, 2012.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Osobennaya chast : Uchebnik. Izd. vtoroe, ispr. i dop. M.: Kontrakt; Infra-M, 2009. S. 284.
Lezhnin R.A. Problemy kvalifikatsii sokrytiya denezhnykh sredstv i imushchestva, za schyet kotorogo dolzhno proizvodit sya vzyskanie nalogov i sborov. quot;Biznes v zakone quot;, 2007, №3.
Keywords:
concealment of property, the restoration of the rights of creditors, the recovery of the property, the safety of the property, the opposition, the effectiveness of the protection.
