On mechanisms for preventing and resolving investment disputes within the framework of the “One Belt, One Road” initiative
( Pp. 82-87)
More about authors
Qiang Yue
PhD, Associate Professor; deputy Head at the Research Center at the Legal Services Commission for the SCO (China); post-doctor at the East China University of Politics and Law; member at the Editorial Board of the journal “Socio-political Sciences”; member of the Editorial Board of the journal “Frontiers in Social Science Research”; deputy General Secretary at the Soviet Branch of the Shanghai Association of Foreign Scientists (SORSA). Shanghai, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9531-199X; E-mail: yueqiang850510@sina.com
Shanghai University of Political Science and Law
Shanghai, China
Shanghai University of Political Science and Law
Shanghai, China
Abstract:
In recent years, the construction of the “One Belt, One Road” project has continued to develop, providing a huge market and development opportunities for the countries along this route. At the same time, investments in the countries along the “One Belt, One Road” project, in addition to general business risks, also face more serious political risks and investment and legal risks. Due to the shortcomings of existing bilateral, regional and multilateral mechanisms for preventing and resolving investment disputes, it is currently not possible to effectively prevent and resolve the risks associated with international investments by Chinese companies in countries along the “One Belt, One Road” initiative. Conclusions. The implementation of the “One Belt, One Road” Initiative is of theoretical and practical importance. Theoretical - in terms of the development of the “theory of diversified management” and the concept of “Justice and Benefit”. Practical - in terms of optimizing the business environment along the “One Belt, One Road” project, protecting the legal rights and interests of Chinese enterprises abroad and promoting the subsequent improvement of investment agreements.
How to Cite:
Qiang Y.., (2021), ON MECHANISMS FOR PREVENTING AND RESOLVING INVESTMENT DISPUTES WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE “ONE BELT, ONE ROAD” INITIATIVE. Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 82-87.
Reference list:
Anokhov I.V., Sukhodolov A.P. Proekt Odin poyas, odin put : garmonizatsiya dolgosrochnykh interesov Rossii i Kitaya // Vestnik MGIMO. 2019. № 3 (66). S. 89-110.
Ba Dyan tszyun . Strategiya Odin poyas i odin put : osnovnye riski i kontrmery // Odin poyas i odin put : analiz kitayskikh i zarubezhnykh uchenykh. Pekin: Izd-vo sotsial nykh nauk Kitaya, 2017. S. 51-62.
Burova E.S., Koroteeva K.V. Veter peremen: aktual nye obsuzhdeniya reformy sistemy razresheniya sporov mezhdu inostrannymi investorami i gosudarstvami // Zakon. 2018. № 5. S. 153-163.
Gan TSzyun syan . Analiz konkurentsii i sotrudnichestva mezhdu Kitaem, Soedinennymi SHtatami i Indiey v ramkakh Novogo SHelkovogo puti // Forum po Severo-Vostochnoy Azii. 2015. Vyp. 1. S. 107-128.
Karpov A.YU. SHelkovyy put - razvitie evraziyskogo prostranstva // Konteynernyy biznes. 2016. № 10 (61). S. 4- 9.
Krupko S. Investitsionnye soglasheniya i spory mezhdu gosudarstvom i chastnym inostrannym investorom // KHozyaystvo i pravo. 2001. Prilozhenie № 5. S. 46.
Popov E.V. Tendentsii v protsessakh razresheniya sporov mezhdu investorami i gosudarstvami // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2017. № 5. S. 58-63.
Sun Goyu. Strategicheskaya kontseptsiya initsiativy Odin poyas i odin put i novoe razvitie ekonomicheskoy diplomatii Kitaya // Mezhdunarodnoe nablyudenie. 2015. № 4. S. 261-273.
TSyu Syuan . Sodeystvie sozdaniyu soobshchestva s edinoy sud boy s pomoshch yu initsiativy Odin poyas i odin put // Narodnyy forum. 2017. № 36. S. 36-37.
CHzhan CHanyuy. Issledovaniya strategii vneshneekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva Kitaya i initsiativy Odin poyas i odin put na osnove opyta politiki otkrytosti i reformy // Ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo Kitaya. 2018. № 11. S. 4-10.
CHzhao KHueyzhun. CHzhun E guntszyan sychouchzhilu tszintsziday ven ti tan so (Poiski sovmestnogo sozdaniya Rossiey i Kitaem Ekonomicheskogo poyasa SHelkovogo puti ) // Elosy, DunOu, CHzhunYA yan tszyu. 2015. № 6. S. 72.
CHzhungo tuntszi nyan tszyan . Pekin, 2017. S. 20.
YAkovlev A.A. Evraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz i kitayskaya initsiativa. Odin poyas - odin put : vozmozhnosti dlya sotrudnichestva // Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2018. № 1. S. 204-211.
Cane J. China s Belt and Road Initiative needs to be protected from terror threats // China Topix. February 15, 2017. Pp. 62-74.
Soliev N. How serious Is the Islamic state thereat to China // The Diplomat. March 14, 2017. Pp. 15-26.
Ba Dyan tszyun . Strategiya Odin poyas i odin put : osnovnye riski i kontrmery // Odin poyas i odin put : analiz kitayskikh i zarubezhnykh uchenykh. Pekin: Izd-vo sotsial nykh nauk Kitaya, 2017. S. 51-62.
Burova E.S., Koroteeva K.V. Veter peremen: aktual nye obsuzhdeniya reformy sistemy razresheniya sporov mezhdu inostrannymi investorami i gosudarstvami // Zakon. 2018. № 5. S. 153-163.
Gan TSzyun syan . Analiz konkurentsii i sotrudnichestva mezhdu Kitaem, Soedinennymi SHtatami i Indiey v ramkakh Novogo SHelkovogo puti // Forum po Severo-Vostochnoy Azii. 2015. Vyp. 1. S. 107-128.
Karpov A.YU. SHelkovyy put - razvitie evraziyskogo prostranstva // Konteynernyy biznes. 2016. № 10 (61). S. 4- 9.
Krupko S. Investitsionnye soglasheniya i spory mezhdu gosudarstvom i chastnym inostrannym investorom // KHozyaystvo i pravo. 2001. Prilozhenie № 5. S. 46.
Popov E.V. Tendentsii v protsessakh razresheniya sporov mezhdu investorami i gosudarstvami // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2017. № 5. S. 58-63.
Sun Goyu. Strategicheskaya kontseptsiya initsiativy Odin poyas i odin put i novoe razvitie ekonomicheskoy diplomatii Kitaya // Mezhdunarodnoe nablyudenie. 2015. № 4. S. 261-273.
TSyu Syuan . Sodeystvie sozdaniyu soobshchestva s edinoy sud boy s pomoshch yu initsiativy Odin poyas i odin put // Narodnyy forum. 2017. № 36. S. 36-37.
CHzhan CHanyuy. Issledovaniya strategii vneshneekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva Kitaya i initsiativy Odin poyas i odin put na osnove opyta politiki otkrytosti i reformy // Ekonomicheskoe sotrudnichestvo Kitaya. 2018. № 11. S. 4-10.
CHzhao KHueyzhun. CHzhun E guntszyan sychouchzhilu tszintsziday ven ti tan so (Poiski sovmestnogo sozdaniya Rossiey i Kitaem Ekonomicheskogo poyasa SHelkovogo puti ) // Elosy, DunOu, CHzhunYA yan tszyu. 2015. № 6. S. 72.
CHzhungo tuntszi nyan tszyan . Pekin, 2017. S. 20.
YAkovlev A.A. Evraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz i kitayskaya initsiativa. Odin poyas - odin put : vozmozhnosti dlya sotrudnichestva // Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2018. № 1. S. 204-211.
Cane J. China s Belt and Road Initiative needs to be protected from terror threats // China Topix. February 15, 2017. Pp. 62-74.
Soliev N. How serious Is the Islamic state thereat to China // The Diplomat. March 14, 2017. Pp. 15-26.
Keywords:
mechanism, risk, route, arbitration, company, diversified mechanisms, investor, state, route.
