Legislative Function of the Commissioner for Human Rights in Russia
( Pp. 13-18)

More about authors
Kulishenko Ekaterina A. aspirantka kafedry konstitucionnogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava yuridicheskogo instituta
Law Institute of Belgorod State National Research University
Belgorod, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The purpose of the study. In this article, based on the analysis of constitutional and legal provisions and theoretical sources, the law-making function of the Commissioner for Human Rights in Russia is considered. The purpose of the study was to identify the content of the legislative function of the Ombudsman, as well as to develop proposals and recommendations aimed at modernizing the constitutional and legal regulation of the designated function of the Commissioner. Conclusions. In the course of the study, it is concluded that it is advisable to give the right of legislative initiative to those commissioners who are appointed by legislative (representative) bodies at both the federal and regional levels, regardless of whether they perform the functions of “general competence” or belong to specialized ombudsmen. It is noted that the function of the Ombudsman to improve legislation (legislative function) in the field of human rights is important in the process of eliminating shortcomings and gaps in existing legislative acts and bringing them into line with international standards.
How to Cite:
Kulishenko E.A., (2021), LEGISLATIVE FUNCTION OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN RUSSIA. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 13-18.
Reference list:
Amirova R.R. Organizatsionno-pravovye voprosy deyatel nosti upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v sub ekte Rossiyskoy Federatsii: na primere Respubliki Tatarstan: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan , 2006. 23 s.
Babaev S.V. Teoriya funktsii sovremennogo rossiyskogo gosudarstva: Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Nizhniy Novgorod, 2001. 22 s.
Begaeva A.A. Upolnomochennyy po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004.
Buyankina E.S. Stanovlenie i razvitie instituta Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v sub ektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Saransk, 2006. 30 s.
Glebov A.P. Ponyatie i struktura funktsiy sotsialisticheskogo gosudarstva: posobie po spetskursu Problemy sotsialisticheskogo gosudarstva i prava / otv. red.: I.A. Galagan. Voronezh, 1974. 37 s.
Dmitruk V.N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: ucheb. posobie. Minsk: Amalfeya, 1999. 221 s.
Kulishenko E.A. K voprosu ob uchastii Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v zakonotvorcheskom protsesse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Pravo i praktika. 2020. № 1. S. 19-22. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosuob-uchastii-upolnomochennogo-po-pravam-cheloveka-vzakonotvorcheskom-protsesse-rossiyskoy-federatsii
Lebedeva E.V. Instituty grazhdanskogo obshchestva v realizatsii pravookhranitel noy funktsii Rossiyskogo gosudarstva: Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. CHelyabinsk, 2007. 176 s.
Manokhin V.M. Poryadok formirovaniya organov gosudarstvennogo upravleniya. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1963. 183 s.
Markhgeym M.V., Novikova A.E. Formy i sposoby deyatel nosti Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v sub ektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Gosudarstvennaya vlast i mestnoe samoupravlenie. 2009. № 5. S. 38-41.
Melikhova A.V. Funktsii sovetskogo i sovremennogo rossiyskogo gosudarstva: Avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan , 2006. 41 s.
Morozova L.A. Funktsii rossiyskogo gosudarstva na sovremennom etape // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1993. № 6. S. 98-108.
Nikitin E.L. Aktual nye problemy prokurorskoy deyatel nosti pri osushchestvlenii ugolovnogo presledovaniya: Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Sankt-Peterburg, 2000. 198 s. http://dlib.rsl.ru/rsl01000000000/rsl01000288000/rsl01000288293/rsl01000288293.pdf.
Plotnikova A.E. Strukturno-organizatsionnye i funktsional nye osobennosti upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Orenburg, 2013. URL: http://dlib.rsl.ru/rsl01006000000/rsl01006691000/rsl01006691079/rsl01006691079.pdf.
Sungurov A.YU., SHishlov A.V. Sravnitel nyy analiz zakonodatel stva ob Upolnomochennykh po pravam cheloveka v nekotorykh sub ektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. № 4. S. 41-49.
Taranovskiy F.V. Uchebnik entsiklopedii prava. YUr ev, 1917. 534 s.
Tonkov E.E. Transformatsiya yuridicheskikh form gosudarstvennoy deyatel nosti v period ekonomicheskogo krizisa. M.: SGU, 2009. 336 s.
Udal tsov A.A. Upolnomochennyy po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii i organy vnutrennikh del: problemy teorii i praktiki: Avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2003.
KHamaneva N.YU. Spetsifika pravovogo statusa Upolnomochennogo po pravam cheloveka v RF i problemy zakonodatel nogo regulirovaniya ego deyatel nosti // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1997. № 9.
KHaratyan F. O ponyatii kompetentsiya organa gosudarstva // Obzor sotsial nykh nauk. Erevan. 1984. № 7.
SHeremet K.F. Voprosy kompetentsii mestnykh Sovetov // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1965. № 4. S. 17-28.
Emikh V.V. Kompetentsiya upolnomochennykh po pravam cheloveka v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie: Dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2008. 220 s.
Keywords:
legislative function, Commissioner for Human Rights, Ombudsman, modernization of legislation, protection of human and civil rights and freedoms.


Related Articles