THE ROLE OF THE STATE IN THE LEGAL REGULATION OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY
( Pp. 234-241)

The purpose of this study is to analyze the digitalization process, the digital economy and the role of the state in the legal regulation of the digital economy. The result of the study is the formulation of a three-level scheme of legal regulation of the digital economy, which will take into account the interests of all interested parties, as well as the technological features of the ongoing processes. It seems that the legal regulation of the digital economy is carried out at the national, international and non-state levels. At the same time, the results of the study carried out include the conclusion that the type of economy existing in the state (market type of economy, mixed type of economy, command-administrative type of economy) affects the role of the state in the legal regulation of the digital economy. Thus, the market type of economy presupposes for the state the role of a «night watchman», which interferes with market mechanisms only as a last resort, that is, when the market was unable to resolve this issue through self-regulation. Consequently, the role of the state in relation to the digital economy within a market economy cannot be fundamentally different from the basic type of economy that exists in the country. The mixed type of economy does not determine the degree of state intervention in economic issues, since each state independently establishes the proportions of the ratio of market and administrative mechanisms. Thus, the role of the state in regulating the digital economy within a mixed type of economy will depend on the real role of the state in economic processes. The Russian Federation did not directly constitutionally fix the type of economy that exists in the state, as a result of which various researchers substantiate the existence in the Russian Federation of either a market economy or a mixed economy, which creates uncertainty about the role of the Russian Federation in regulating the digital economy.

Anna E.K., (2021), THE ROLE OF THE STATE IN THE LEGAL REGULATION OF THE DIGITAL ECONOMY. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 3 => 234-241.

Berman H. World Law. Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 18, Issue 5, 1994. P. 1617-1622.
Berman P.S. From International Law to Law and Globalization. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 43, 2005. P. 485-556.
Berman P.S. Global Legal Pluralism. Southern California Law Review, Vol. 80, 2007. P. 1155-1237.
De Carolis D. The process of harmonisatin of the law of international commercial arbitration: drafting and diffusion of uniform norms. Doctoral Thesis. 2010. Available at: http://eprints-phd.biblio.unitn.it/214/1/dissertation.pdf
Hertogh M. What is Non-state Law Mapping the Other Hemisphere of the Legal World. International Governance and Law: State Regulation and Non-state Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. P. 1-18.
Levit J.K. A Bottom-Up Approach to International Lawmaking: The Tale of Three Trade Finance Instruments. The Yale Journal of International Law. Vol. 30. No. 125, 2005. P. 125-209.
Peters A., Pagotto I. Soft Law as a New Mode of Governance: A Legal Perspective. NEWGOV: New Models of Governance. 2006. P. 31 p.
Santos B.S. Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. London and New York: Routledge, 1995. 614 r.
Teubner G. Breaking Frames: The Global Interplay of Legal and Social Systems. American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 45, Issue 1, 1997. P.149-169.
Teubner G. Global private regimes: Neo-spontaneous law and dual constitution of autonomous sectors in world society 2004. Available at: https:www.jura.uni-frankfurt.de/42852650 /global private regimes.pdf
Akimov N.A. Vliyanie tendentsiy tsifrovoy ekonomiki na ekonomicheskuyu funktsiyu gosudarstva i ee realizatsiyu // Sotsial no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i protsessy. 2017. № 6. S. 431-436.
Bondar D.A. Izmenenie roli gosudarstva, gosudarstvennoy vlasti i prava v usloviyakh tsifrovoy ekonomiki // Transformatsiya prava v informatsionnom obshchestve: materialy II Vserossiyskogo nauchno-prakticheskogo foruma molodykh uchyenykh i studentov. 2019. Izdatel stvo: Federal noe gosudarstvennoe byudzhetnoe obrazovatel noe uchrezhdenie vysshego obrazovaniya Ural skiy gosudarstvennyy yuridicheskiy universitet . S. 242-249.
Voynikanis E.A. Paradigmal nyy sdvig v sovremennom prave // Filosofiya politiki i prava: sbornik nauchnykh rabt. M.: Izd. Vorob ev A.V., 2010. Vyp. 1. S. 138-161.
Kirichyek E.V. TSifrovizatsiya v konstitutsionno-pravovom izmerenii // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta Ministerstva Vnutrennikh del Rossii. 2020. № 4. S. 29-40.
Pokrovskiy I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. M.: Statut, 1998. 353 s.

digital economy, digitalization, type of economy, market economy, mixed economy.