IMPOSITION OF SECONDARY LIABILITY ON THE HEIRS OF THE PERSON WHO IS CONTROLLING DEBTOR IN CASE OF INSOLVENCY (BANKRUPTCY)
( Pp. 188-192)

Purpose of the research: The article discusses issues related to the possibility of bringing the heirs of the controlling debtor to subsidiary liability. Various approaches that have developed in judicial practice on the issue under consideration are analyzed. The main conclusions are made about the effectiveness of the legal mechanism on the issue under consideration. The options for improving legislation in this area are proposed. The aim of the study is to establish the possibility and relationship of bringing the persons controlling the debtor and their heirs to subsidiary liability. Results. Judicial practice applies a new approach according to which the heirs of the persons controlling the debtor who were brought to subsidiary liability, if the inheritance is accepted, also inherit the debts of the testator.

Alexandr S.S., (2021), IMPOSITION OF SECONDARY LIABILITY ON THE HEIRS OF THE PERSON WHO IS CONTROLLING DEBTOR IN CASE OF INSOLVENCY (BANKRUPTCY). Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 3 => 188-192.

Dolinskaya V.V. Problemy ponyatiynogo apparata v zakonodatel stve o nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve): razmyshleniya o glave III.2 FZ O nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve) / V.V. Dolinskaya // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2018. N 7. S. 9-15.
ZHarentsova YU.S. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost pri bankrotstve: otdel nye aspekty novovvedeniy // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2018. N 7. S. 27-28.
Eremenko V.I. O nasledovanii intellektual nykh prav v Postanovlenii Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF / V.I. Eremenko // Advokat. 2012. N 7. S. 43-51.
Karelina S.A. Nesostoyatel nost (bankrotstvo) kak yuridicheskiy sostav // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. 2008. N 4. S. 7-9
Karelina S.A. Printsipy pravovogo regulirovaniya otnosheniy, voznikayushchikh v svyazi s nesostoyatel nost yu (bankrotstvom) dolzhnika // Predprinimatel skoe pravo. 2008. N 2. S. 3-5.
Morkhat P.M. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost nominal nykh direktorov: analiz praktiki arbitrazhnykh sudov // Sud ya. 2019. N 3. S. 43-50.
Razumov I.V. Zakonodatel stvo o bankrotstve trebuet ne tochechnogo, a sistemnogo reformirovaniya // Vestnik AS Moskovskogo okruga. 2019. N 3. S. 15.
Ruchkina G.F. Finansovaya podderzhka kak klyuchevaya sostavlyayushchaya v razvitii sub ektov malogo i srednego predprinimatel stva // Bankovskoe pravo. 2017. N 5. S. 7-12.
Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. V 2 tomakh. T. 1: uchebnik dlya vuzov / pod redaktsiey O.A. Krasavchikova. 3-e izd. Moskva: Vysshaya shkola, 1985. 544 s.
Suvorov E.D. K voprosu o pravovoy prirode subsidiarnoy otvetstvennosti po obyazatel stvam nesostoyatel nogo dolzhnika za dovedenie do bankrotstva / E.D. Suvorov // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2018. N 7. S. 42-49.
KHaliullina ZH.E., Erlikh M.E. Nekotorye pravovye aspekty privlecheniya k subsidiarnoy otvetstvennosti kontroliruyushchikh dolzhnika lits po obyazatel stvam dolzhnika-bankrota // ZHurnal predprinimatel skogo i korporativnogo prava. 2019. N 3. S. 13-16.
Opredelenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Samarskoy oblasti ot 13 iyulya 2020 po delu № A55-9320/2016.
Opredelenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Rostovskoy oblasti ot 01.08.2019 po delu № A53-22198/14.
Opredelenie Arbitrazhnogo suda g. Moskvy ot 25.12.2018 po delu №A40-187351/13-36-245 B.
Opredelenie Verkhovnogo suda RF ot 16.12.2019 po delu №A04-7886/2016.
Postanovlenie Devyatnadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 31.08.2016 N 19AP-1454/2015 po delu N A14-13120/2014.

bankruptcy, subsidiary liability, heir, person controlling the debtor.