Opportunities for Mutual Assimilation of Labor Law Regulations of the Russian Federation and the UAE in Conditions OF Activation of Migration Flows
( Pp. 22-28)

The article deals with the problem associated with the development of bilateral relations between countries on the issues of ensuring the rights of labor migrants, analyzes the possibilities of mutual assimilation of labor law norms of the Russian Federation and the UAE in the context of increased migration flows. This topic is relevant in the light of the fact that the existing conventional mechanism of labor law is not able to provide the principle of universality in the regulation of labor relations, and therefore other approaches are needed to solve the problems of international labor law, which is especially important in the context of expanding migration flows. The problem that has arisen is due to the fact that modern international law is based on a system of international conventions, which demonstrates its inability to create universal legal norms suitable for effective interaction between countries in the field of labor migration. The lack of universality forces countries to look for other mechanisms of legal interaction in the field of labor relations, using, in particular, the possibilities of bilateral legal cooperation, one of which is the mutual assimilation of labor law norms. The article determines that the modern civilizational situation leads to the collapse of the system of international law, to an understanding of the need to form legal systems that meet the needs of each individual state. On these grounds, conditions arise for the development of two polar legal paradigms, where one of the lines of the “split” is the labor law issue, which becomes one of the elements in creating a political consensus between Russia and the UAE. The article shows the unity of the positions of Russia and the UAE on this issue, points out the need to assimilate the labor law norms of the Russian Federation and the UAE, considering the increase in the flow of labor migrants.

Abdullaev E.E. оgli. Opportunities for Mutual Assimilation of Labor Law Regulations of the Russian Federation and the UAE in Conditions OF Activation of Migration Flows. Lobbying in the Legislative Process. 2023. Vol. 2. No. 1. Pр. 22–28. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.33693/2782-7372-2023-2-1-22-28

Alferova E.V. The crisis of international law: Causes and ways out (Review). Modern International Law: Domestic and Foreign Studies. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 14–30. (In Rus.)
Ayupova Z.K., Kusainov D.U. Legal processes as a constituent basis of modern legal integration. Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2015. No. 4. Pp. 18–25. (In Rus.)
Branovitsky K.L. Legal instruments for convergence of national legal systems on the example of civil procedural law. Jurisprudence. 2018. Vol. 62. No. 4. Pp. 606–624. (In Rus.)
Zarubin M.Yu., Antashov M.A. To the question of some topical problems of labor law in various jurisdictions. Education and Law. 2021. No. 8. Pp. 306–311. (In Rus.)

Kurchinskaya-Grasso N.O. The crisis of modern international law is the most problematic issue. Colloquium-journal. 2019. No. 23. Pp. 33–36. (In Rus.)
Musaelyan L.A. The crisis of international law: Civilizational and geopolitical factors. Bulletin of the Perm University. Legal Sciences. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 211–226. (In Rus.)

Orlova E.E. The role of harmonization of legal regulation in the process of global and regional integration. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2021. Vol. 17. No. 6. Pp. 147–158. (In Rus.)
Protasova A.S. Conflict regulation of labor relations complicated by a foreign element: problems and prospects. Bulletin of the Buryat State University. Philosophy. 2011. No. 2. Pp. 224–228. (In Rus.)



Entin M.L., Entina E.G., Torkunova E.A. Modern requirements for the national legal system. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2019. No. 11–24. (In Rus.)
Alston P. Facing up to the complexities of the ILO’s core labor standards agenda. European Journal of International Law. 2005. Vol. 16. Is. 3. Рр. 467–480.
Bastaki J. Labor migration and the Gulf Arab States: Some observations on the potential of the GCR. Journal of Refugee Studies. 2021. Vol. 34. Is. 3. Pp. 2912–2932.
Ciongaru E. The juridical transplant (legal acculturation) in context of globalization. Impact of Socio-economic and Technological Transformations at National, European and International Level (ISETT). 2015. Vol. 5. Рр. 88–95.
Gulf Labor Markets, Migration and Population (GLMM). 2018. No. 1. URL: https://gulfmigration.grc.net/media/pubs/exno/GLMM EN 2018 01.pdf
nd revised and extended revision. URL: https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/02980.pdf
Gravel E., Kohiyama T., Tsotroudi K. A legal perspective on the role of international labour standards in rebalancing globalization. Revue Interventions Economique. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/interventionseconomiques/1703
Kahn-Nisser S. External governance, convention ratification and monitoring: The EU, the ILO and labor standards in EU accession countries. European Journal of Industrial Relations. 2014. Vol. 20. Рр. 383–398.
Koliev F. Promoting international labor standards: The ILO and national labor regulations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2021. Vol. 24. Is. 2. Рр. 361–380.
Metawea M. Work patterns under the UAE Federal Labor Law. 2021. URL: https://chambers.com/articles/work-patterns-under-the-uae-federal-labour-law
Qadri M. The UAE’s Kafala System: Harmless or human trafficking? In: Dubai’s role in facilitating corruption and global illicit financial flows. 2021. Рp. 79–85.
Scicluna N. Integration through the disintegration of law? The ECB and EU constitutionalism in the crisis. Journal of European Public Policy. 2018. Vol. 25. Issue 12. Pp. 1874–1891.

labor law, migration, assimilation, regulation, policy, cooperation.