The Problems of Constructing the Future: Left-wing Philosophers vs Neoliberalism
( Pp. 135-142)

The purpose of this study is to analyze the different projects of the future by thinkers who adhere to the left-wing ideology. Two directions have been established for the development of an image of the future that is intended to replace the unjust socio-economic relations of today. The first direction is related to the demonstration of the shortcomings of the practical implementation of liberalism and neoliberalism, which has taken the outlines of neo-feudalism. The second direction emphasizes the gradual rebirth of capitalism into post-capitalism through the emergence of new classes of precariat, personhood and impersonality, and the emergence of people who exist as individuals. This situation actualizes the search for new ideological approaches in accordance with the changed reality. In addition, more and more evidence confirms the need to reassess the nature and functions of the economy in favor of the principles of post-growth. The possibility of combining the ideas of P. Mason, N. Srnicek and A. Williams to replace capitalism with post-capitalism by expanding the use of information and communication technologies and automation on this basis of all economic activities; reducing working time without reducing its pay; introducing an unconditional basic income and eliminating outdated approaches to work ethics is shown. The implementation of the above approaches can contribute to the establishment of a new counter-hegemonic social order, which will be an alternative to the market economy.

Andrei M.K., Zhukov D.P., (2022), THE PROBLEMS OF CONSTRUCTING THE FUTURE: LEFT-WING PHILOSOPHERS VS NEOLIBERALISM. Sociopolitical Sciences, 6 => 135-142.

Busygina I.M. The Center-periphery model, federalism and the problem of modernization of the Russian state. Journal of Political Science, 2011. Pp. 53-70. (In Rus.)
Vazyulin V.A. Logic of history: Questions of theory and methodology. M.: LENAND, 2015. 384 p.
Wallerstein I. Structural crisis, or Why Capitalists may consider capitalism unprofitable. In: Is there a future for capitalism? Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publishing House, 2017. 320 p.
Standing G. Precariat: A new dangerous class. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2014. 328 p.
Davydov D. Post-capitalism and the birth of the personaliate. Moscow: Ripoll Classic, 2021. 336 p.
Dean J. Communism or neo-feudalism? Logos. 2019. No. 6. Pp. 85-116. (In Rus.)
Liotar J.-F. The state of postmodernity. Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology; St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 1998. 160 p.
Marx K., Engels F. Essays. Vol. 3. Moscow: State Publication of Political Literature, 1955. 629 p.
Matveev I.A. Hybrid neoliberalization: The state, legitimacy and neoliberalism in Putin’s Russia. Journal of Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics “Politiya. Analysis. Chronicle. Forecast”. 2015. No. 4. Pp. 25-47. (In Rus.)
Mason P. Post-Capitalism: a guide to our future. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press, 2016. 416 p.
Srnicek N., Williams A. Inventing the future: Post-Capitalism and the world without labor. Translated from English. Moscow: Strelka Press, 2019. 336 p.
Srnicek N. Platform Capitalism. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2019. 128 p.
Hayden D. What would a non-sexist city look like? Reflections on home, urban interning and labor. Logos. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 39-66. (In Rus.)
Fischer M. Capitalist realism. Moscow: Ultraculture 2.0, 2010. 144 p.
Fishman L.G. The decline of the “Society of Labor”: А modern ideological constellation. Journal of Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics “Politiya. Analysis. Chronicle. Forecast”. 2016. No. 3. Pp. 116-129. (In Rus.)
Fukuyama F. The end of history. Questions of Philosophy. 1990. No. 3. Pp. 134-148. (In Rus.)
Fisher M., Gilbert J. Reclaim modernity: Beyond markets, beyond machines. London: Compass, 2014 36 p.
Gualtieri L., Palomba I., Merati F.A. et al. Design of human-centered collaborative assembly workstations for the improvement of operators physical ergonomics and production efficiency: A case study // Sustainability. 2020. No. 12 (9). P. 3606. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093606
Lorey I. State of insecurity: Government of the precarious. London; New York: Verso (Futures). 2015. 148 p.
Paulson L., B chs M. Public acceptance of post-growth: Factors and implications for post-growth strategy // Futures. 2022. Vol. 143. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103020

postcapitalism, liberalism, vision of the future, left-wing philosophers, socio-economic formation, communications.