Analysis of the Formation of the Subsystem of International Relations in Northeast Asia from the Point of View of the Civilizational Approach Part 2
( Pp. 91-95)

The purpose and objectives. The purpose of the article is to analyze the formation of the subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia from the point of view of the civilizational approach, and the role of such countries as China, Japan, Mongolia and Korea in this process. Methodological approach. The methodology of L.N. Gumilev is the main one in the work, as well as the systematic approach developed in Oriental political science by A.D. Voskresensky, general scientific methods of cognition and the comparative historical method are also used. Results and conclusions. The article offers an examination of the ideology and model of conducting foreign policy of individual countries of Northeast Asia, primarily China, Japan, Mongolia and Korea, from the point of view of a civilizational approach in the context of the formation of a new order and a new subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia. Originality and value. The study is valuable in view of its relevance and originality of the work, which focuses on obtaining new knowledge about the ideology and model of conducting foreign policy of individual countries of Northeast Asia, primarily China, Japan, Mongolia and Korea, the study of contradictions between ethnic and non-ethnic systems of these states, determining their role in the emergence of a new, the change of the Mongol-Chinese-centric order, and a new stage in the history of international relations in Northeast Asia.

Nikiforov S.V., (2022), ANALYSIS OF THE FORMATION OF THE SUBSYSTEM OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IN NORTHEAST ASIA FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE CIVILIZATIONAL APPROACH PART 2. Sociopolitical Sciences, 5 => 91-95.

Kowner R. Historical Dictionary of the Russo-Japanese War. Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2006. Pp. 344-345.
Mason R.H.P., Caiger J.G. A history of Japan: Revised edition. Vermont: Clarendon, 1997. Pp. 202-205.
Miron J.A., Feige Ch. The opium wars. Opium legalization and opium consumption in China. 2005 Electronic resource . URL: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/11379703/miron-opium-wars.pdf
Gumilev L.N. Biosphere and impulses of consciousness. 1978 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://royallib.com/book/gumilev_lev/biosfera_i_impulsi_soznaniya.html
Gumilev L.N. Ethnogenesis and the biosphere of the earth. Explanatory dictionary of terms. 1979 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.gumilevica.kulichki.net/ARGS/args800.htm
Ivanov K.V. Features of the integration policy of the Japanese Empire in Korea and Taiwan in early 20th century. Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. 2012. No. 10 (69). Pp. 350-356. (In Rus.)
Karelova L.B. Problems of modernization in Japan and intercultural interaction. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2012. No. 6 (27). Pp. 183-186. (In Rus.)
Knyazev S. “Discovery at gunpoint”: How in the XIX century the Americans “helped” Japan to abandon the policy of isolationism. RT. July 8, 2018. URL: https://ru.rt.com/bgd0
Ovchinnikova S.E. “The Society for the Study of Sowing” and its role in the creation of the “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere” project, 1933-1940. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. 2013. Ser. 13. Issue 2. Pp. 34-42. (In Rus.)
Rysakov A.S. The main trends in Confucianism of the Qing epoch. Review of the Christian Academy for the Humanities. 2011. Vol. 12. No. 1. Pp. 133-144. (In Rus.)
Fedosova A.A. The activities of Sun Yat-sen’s activity in the Post-Xinhai: The establishment of the national party and the establishment of the alliance with Moscow and communist party of China. Bulletin of the Ufa Law. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 13-17. (In Rus.)

ethnopolitical system, ethnic and non-ethnic systems, Mongolian-Chinese-centric order, subsystem of international relations in Northeast Asia, ideology and model of foreign policy, China, Japan, Mongolia, Korea.