Hybrid Warfare as a Preventive Defense of the United States in Modern Conditions
( Pp. 13-20)

More about authors
Annenkov Vladimir I. Dr. Sci. (Military), Professor; senior researcher at the Scientific Research Center
Military Academy of the Strategic Missile Forces named after Peter the Great
Balashikha, Russian Federation Moiseev Anatoly V. Cand. Sci. (Military), Professor; Professor at the Department of the Public Administration in Foreign Policy
Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
Moscow, Russian Federation Shangaraev Ruslan N. Cand. Sci. (Econ.); associate professor at the Department of the Public Administration in Foreign Policy
Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the actual problem of preparation and conduct of hybrid wars. It is noted that preventive defense is aimed at preventive blocking of potential threats before they can turn into real threats to the national interests of the United States. It is established that the multipolar world, the development of science and modern technologies indicate that the concept of absolute national security today is nothing more than a myth, today complete security and total defense are unattainable. The concept, essence of hybrid warfare and hybrid warfare through the geopolitical confrontation of states are considered. The basic principles of conducting and distinguishing features of hybrid warfare are determined. It is emphasized that, within the framework of the hybrid war, the so-called network wars are being waged. In conclusion, it is stated that the factor of the increasing role of modern communication technologies in the issues of information warfare and their impact on the formation of a “new world of political processes” is also relevant for the network-centric format of the hybrid war of the XXI century.
How to Cite:
Annenkov V.I., Moiseev A.V., Shangaraev R.N., (2022), HYBRID WARFARE AS A PREVENTIVE DEFENSE OF THE UNITED STATES IN MODERN CONDITIONS. Sociopolitical Sciences, 1 => 13-20.
Reference list:
Annenkov V.I., Anikin V.I., Moiseev A.V., Surma I.V. Energy security as the basis of Russian national security in modern conditions. National Security / Note Bene. 2015. No. 2. Pp. 161-176. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2015.2.13117.
Annenkov V.I., Kononov L.A., Moiseev A.V., Shangaraev R.N. International security. Nuclear aspects of the present. Moscow: KnoRus, 2020.
Annenkov V.I., Karpov V.V., Moiseev A.V., Surma I.V. “Setcentric management”: A modern paradigm for the development of management systems in the armed forces of the leading powers of the world. National Security / Note Bene. 2014. No. 2. (In Rus.) DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.2.11393.
Annenkov V.I., Kononov L.A. Russia and the nuclear world: Aspects of national security. Moscow: Deep. Academy of the Russian Foreign Ministry, 2004.
Annenkov V.I., Baranov S.N., Kononov L.A. Theoretical foundations of nuclear geopolitics. Moscow: Rusavia, 2013.
Annenkov V.I., Kononov L.A., Moiseev A.V., Shangaraev R.N. International security. Nuclear aspects of modernity. Moscow, 2020.
Moiseev A.V., Konova I.A. International terrorism: prospects and problems of creating an anti-terrorist coalition. In the collection: Scientific notes by young political scientists and economists. Moscow, 2017. Pp. 16-25.
Moiseev A.V., Abramov A.S., Chumachenko A.P., Smirnov E.V. System of selection of military personnel for command and staff posts. Moscow, 2007.
Anikin V.I., Moiseev A.V., Surma I.V., Semenova O.V. Modern approaches to foreign policy decisions in the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2021.
Frenk Hoffman. Conflict in the twenty-first century. The emergence of hybrid warfare: Monograph. U.S. National Defense University, 2007.
Buchan G.C., Matonick D., Shipbaugh C., Mesic R. Future roles of U.S. nuclear forces: Implications for U.S. strategy // RAND Corporation. 2004. R. 37.
Danelyan A.A., Mikhaylik A., Zaemsky V.F. et al. Digital diplomacy. M., 2021.
Keywords:
hybrid warfare, the sphere of geopolitics, preventive defense, deterrence models and strategic stability, geopolitical struggle, principles of hybrid warfare, distinctive features of hybrid warfare, communication technologies, information warfare.


Related Articles

Political Institutions, Processes and Technologies Pages: 29-37 DOI: 10.33693/2223-0092-2023-13-5-29-37 Issue №24646
Russian Society and Socio-Political Risks of the Digital Era in the Global Dimension
socio-political risks political crisis social inequality digital inequality information warfare
Show more
Public Law Pages: 16-20 DOI: 10.33693/2782-7372-2023-2-2-16-20 Issue №23134
Integrated Approach of Personnel Training for Cybersecurity: Challenges and Problems
digital economy information law intellectual property information security information warfare
Show more
Pages: 16-20 DOI: 10.33693/2782-7372-2023-2-2-16-20 Issue №
Integrated Approach of Personnel Training for Cybersecurity: Challenges and Problems
digital economy information law intellectual property information security information warfare
Show more
3. Political problems of international relations, global and regional development Pages: 25-30 Issue №11007
SANCTION PROCESS IN FORMAT OF HYBRID WAR AGAINST RUSSIA, OR REFLECTIONS ABOUT ACT, ADOPTED BY US CONGRESS ON JULY 25, 2017
biological warfare elections hybrid warfare the law information-psychological war
Show more
5. Social Philosophy Pages: 54-59 Issue №9525
PHENOMENON OF RUSSOPHOBIA: SOCIO-PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS
security hybrid warfare West information-psychological war xenophobia
Show more