The Problems of realization of THE public danger OF CRIME in the Specific part of criminal code of Russian federation
(75-83)

More about authors
Petrushenkov Aleksadr N. assistant professor, PhD in Law, assistant professor of criminal law and procedure department
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Annotation:
Objectives: the objective of the scientific research is the necessity of defining public danger of crime via the unity of criminal law norms of the Common and Specific parts of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. The article refers to consequence of non-system comprehension and application of definition of public danger of crime. Methods: in the article the following definitions are analyzed: “the public danger of crime”, “characteristics of public danger”, “the degree of public danger”, “insignificance of crime”. Application of logical and comparative legal methods enabled to work out the viewpoint on the problem of the realization of characteristic of the public danger of crime in Specific part articles. Conclusions: the article refers to the necessity of comprehension of the public danger of crime via its legal preservation and characteristics of ordinary crime and the person of criminal. The definition of the public danger of crime and the algorithm of analyses of the public danger are proposed. The standards of the insignificance of crime are determined. Sense: the content of this scientific research may be used by lecturers of universities during the course of the Criminal law, by students in their reports, researches and graduation works. The results of this research may be useful for those who involved in legislation in the criminal law sphere. The main idea of this article may be also helpful for dissertation scientific researches.
How to Cite:
Petrushenkov A.N., (2018), THE PROBLEMS OF REALIZATION OF THE PUBLIC DANGER OF CRIME IN THE SPECIFIC PART OF CRIMINAL CODE OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION. Gaps in Russian legislation, 2: 75-83.
Reference list:
Piontkovskiy A.A. Uchenie o prestuplenii po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. - M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1961. - 666 s.
Kuznetsova N.F. Prestuplenie i prestupnost. - M.: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1969. - 232 s.
Kozlov A.P. Ponyatie prestupleniya. - SPb.: Izdatelstvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2004. - 819 s.
Mitskevich A.F. Printsip sootvetstviya nakazaniya obshchestvennoy opasnosti prestupleniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave: diss. kand. yurid. nauk. - Tomsk: Irkutskaya gosudarstvennaya ekonomicheskaya akademiya, 1985. - 216 s.
Krivochenko L.N. Klassifikatsiya prestupleniy. - KHarkov: Izdatelstvo pri KHarkovskom universitete, 1983. - 129 s.
Durmanov N.D. Ponyatie prestupleniya. - M., L.: Izdatelstvo AN SSSR, 1948. - 315 s.
Maltsev V.V. Vvedenie v ugolovnoe pravo. Monografiya. - Volgograd: VYUI MVD Rossii, 2000. - 204 s.
Demidov YU.A. Sotsialnaya tsennost i otsenka v ugolovnom prave. - M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1975. - 184 s.
Tobolkin P.S. Sotsialnaya obuslovlennost ugolovno-pravovykh norm. - Sverdlovsk: Sredne-Uralskoe knizhnoe izdatelstvo, 1983. - 176 s.
Filimonov V.D. Obshchestvennaya opasnost lichnosti prestupnika: predposylki, soderzhanie, kriterii. - Tomsk: Izdatelstvo Tomskogo universiteta, 1970. - 277 s.
Kovalev M.I. Ponyatie i priznaki prestupleniya, i ikh znachenie dlya kvalifikatsii. Uchebnoe posobie. - Sverdlovsk: Izdatelstvo Sverdlovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta, 1977. - 80 s.
Burlakov V.N., Ismailov I.A., Kravtsov B.P., Moraleva K.A., Nikitin V.B., Osipov P.P. Kompleksnoe izuchenie sistemy vozdeystviya na prestupnost. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie osnovy / Pod red. Osipova P.P. - L.: Izdatelstvo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1978. - 150 c.
Oranzhereev N.D. Prestuplenie i nakazanie v matematicheskoy zavisimosti. - M.: Tipolitografiya tovarishchestva Kushnerov i Ko, 1916. - 69 s.
Bluvshteyn YU.D. Ob otsenke stepeni obshchestvennoy opasnosti prestupleniy // Voprosy borby s prestupnostyu. - M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1972. - № 15.
Traynin A.N. Sostav prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. - M: Gosyurizdat, 1951. - 388 s.
Volzhenkin B.V. Obshchestvennaya opasnost prestupnika i eye znachenie dlya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu: avtoref. diss. kand. yurid. nauk. - L.: Leningradskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. A.A. ZHdanova, 1964. - 21 s.
Kuznetsova N.F., Kurinov B.A. Otyagchayushchie i smyagchayushchie obstoyatelstva, uchityvaemye pri opredelenii mery nakazaniya // Primenenie nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. - M.: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1958.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 11.06.1999 № 40 O praktike naznacheniya sudami ugolovnogo nakazaniya // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 129. 07.07.1999.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 22.12.2015 № 58 O praktike naznacheniya sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii ugolovnogo nakazaniya // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 295. 29.12.2015.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 11.12.2014 № 32-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniy stati 159.4 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosom Salekhardskogo gorodskogo suda YAmalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga // Rossiyskaya gazeta. № 293. 24.12.2014.
Kozachenko I.YA. Sanktsii za prestupleniya protiv zhizni i zdorovya: obuslovlennost, struktura, funktsii, vidy. - Tomsk: Izdatelstvo Tomskogo universiteta, 1987. - 232 s.
Levitskiy G.A. K voprosu o printsipakh primeneniya nakazaniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. - M.: Nauka, 1958. № 4.
CHubarev V.L. Obshchestvennaya opasnost prestupleniya i nakazaniya. - M.: Izdatelstvo VNII MVD SSSR, 1982. - 96 s.
Nazhimov V.P. Spravedlivost nakazaniya - vazhneyshee svoystvo ego effektivnosti // Voprosy organizatsii suda i osushchestvleniya pravosudiya v SSSR. - Kaliningrad: Izdatelstvo Kaliningradskogo universiteta, 1973. T. 2.
Gontar I.YA. Kategoriya obshchestvennoy opasnosti v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: istoriya stanovleniya i sovremennoe ponimanie // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2008. № 1.
Petrushenkov A.N. Leytmotiv zakrepleniya i realizatsii instituta obstoyatelstv, smyagchayushchikh i otyagchayushchikh nakazanie v Ugolovnom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // YUridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoy akademii MVD Rossii. - 2016. - № 1 (33).
Kruglikov L.L. Smyagchayushchie i otyagchayushchie otvetstvennost obstoyatelstva v ugolovnom prave (voprosy teorii). - Voronezh: Izdatelstvo Voronezhskogo universiteta, 1985. - 164 s.
Blagov E.O. O naznachenii nakazaniya pri nalichii otyagchayushchikh obstoyatelstv // Ugolovnoe pravo. - 2008. - № 3.
Myasnikov O.A. Smyagchayushchie i otyagchayushchie nakazanie obstoyatelstva v rossiyskom ugolovnom prave: diss. kand. yurid. nauk. - M.: Orenburgskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet, 2001. - 179 s.
Lyapunov YU.I. Obshchestvennaya opasnost deyaniya kak universalnaya kategoriya sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. - M.: VYUZSH, 1989. - 117 s.
Martsev A.I. Voprosy sovershenstvovaniya norm o prestuplenii // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1988. - № 11.
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2005 № 5 O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh u sudov pri primenenii Kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - № 80. - 19.04.2005.
Blagov E.V. Primenenie ugolovnogo prava (teoriya i praktika). - SPb: YUridicheskiy tsentr Press, 2004. - 505 s.
Kovalev M.I. Ponyatie prestupleniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave. - Sverdlovsk: Izdatelstvo Uralskogo universiteta, 1987. - 208 s.
Solovev A.N. Ponyatie prestupleniya: teoreticheskie, zakonodatelnye i pravoprimenitelnye aspekty: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. - Volgograd: Krasnodarskiy yuridicheskiy institut MVD Rossii, 2000. - 22 s.
Postanovlenie Fyedorovskogo rayonnogo suda Respubliki Bashkortostan ot 25 noyabrya 2010 g. po ugolovnomu delu № 1-53/2010 // https://rospravosudie.com/ court-fedorovskij-rajonnyj-sud-respublika-bashkortostan-s/act-100800682/ (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2017).
Kassatsionnoe opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ugolovnym delam suda YAmalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga ot 27 yanvarya 2011 g. po ugolovnomu delu № 22-100/2011 // https://rospravosudie.com/court-sud-yamalo-neneckogo-avtonomnogo-okruga-yamalo-neneckij-avtonomnyj-okrug-s/act-104941076/ (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2017).
Kiselev I.A., Lekhanova E.S. Rassledovanie otmyvaniya prestupnykh dokhodov: rekomendatsii dlya sledovateley. - M.: ID quot;YUrisprudentsiya quot;, 2011. - 128 s.
Keywords:
the elements of a crime, social danger of the crime, the nature and degree of public danger of the crime, potential and actual social danger of the crime, the insignificance of the crime.