Dependence of the company's legal personality from the personality of its shareholder as a trend of legislation and law enforcement practice
( Pp. 52-58)

The concept of a legal entity as an independent legal entity, independent distinctiveness of its participants was formed gradually. In the Fatherland Law, it reached its climax in the Soviet era. It was then that such classical features of a legal entity were formulated as organizational unity, property isolation, and independent responsibility. The economic system drove this approach. In a planned socialist economy, an individual could not be the owner of the means of production, and therefore the legal personality of an enterprise was maximally alienated from a person's personality, which was reflected in its characteristics. For a long time, by inertia in Russian law and legislation, this alienation of the shareholder's personality from the legal entity's personality was preserved. The reason for the revision of this approach was the abuse by limited liability participants of legal entities controlled by them, using such a person as a "mask" for their activities and leading to a violation of creditors' interests. In this regard, with Russia's transition to market relations, an interest arose in the foreign theory of corporate law, which developed mechanisms to combat such abuses, studies of corporate forms of a legal entity, and mechanisms for bringing controllers and beneficial owners to justice were updated. The article examines the dynamics of the transformation of a legal entity's theory from dependence to independence and again to its dependence. It is argued that the shareholder's connection with the legal entity is preserved, and complete separation of the legal personality from the shareholder's personality is impossible, which is confirmed by the doctrine, law enforcement practice, and trends in the development of legislation on legal entities.

Shapsugova M.D., (2021), DEPENDENCE OF THE COMPANY'S LEGAL PERSONALITY FROM THE PERSONALITY OF ITS SHAREHOLDER AS A TREND OF LEGISLATION AND LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2 => 52-58.

Ayzin V. Ob otvetstvennosti khozorganov po obyazatel stvam khozraschetnykh predpriyatiy // Arbitrazh. 1937. N 7. S. 4.
Arthur W. Machen. Corporate Personality // Harvard Law Review. 1911. Vol. 24. N 4. Pp. 253-267.
Aleksandrov N.G. Trudovoe pravootnoshenie. M., 1948.
Asknaziy S.A. Ob osnovaniyakh pravovykh otnosheniy mezhdu gosudarstvennymi sotsialisticheskimi organizatsiyami // Osnovnye voprosy teorii sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava. M., 2008. S. 435 - 502.
Bashilov A.P. O torgovykh tovarishchestvakh // ZHurnal Ministerstva yustitsii. 1894. N 1. S.-Peterburg: Tipografiya Pravitel stvuyushchego Senata, 1894.
Bratus S.N. YUridicheskie litsa v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave (Ponyatie, vidy, gosudarstvennye yuridicheskie litsa) / S.N. Bratus . - M.: YUridicheskoe izdatel stvo Ministerstva yustitsii SSSR, 1947. - 364 s. - (Uchenye trudy; Vypusk XII / Vsesoyuznyy institut yuridicheskikh nauk Ministerstva yustitsii SSSR).
Bykanov D.E. Pronikayushchaya otvetstvennost v zarubezhnom i rossiyskom korporativnom prave: dis. kand.yurid.nauk - M., 2018.
Venediktov A.V. Gosudarstvennaya sotsialisticheskaya sobstvennost . Izdatel stvo Akademii nauk SSSR. M.-L., 1948.
Vol f V.YU. Osnovy khozyaystvennogo prava. M.: Finansovoe izdatel stvo NKF SSSR, 1928.
Gabov A.V. Kratkiy istoricheskiy obzor stanovleniya instituta yuridicheskogo v otechestvennom prave. V kn.: quot;YUridicheskie litsa v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave: Monografiya. V 3 t. Obshchie polozheniya o yuridicheskikh litsakh quot; (tom 1) Elektronnyy resurs SPS Konsul tant Plyus (data obrashcheniya 13.01.2021)
Genkin D. YUridicheskie litsa v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave // Problemy sotsialisticheskogo prava. 1939. N 1. S. 86 - 91.
Egorova M.A. Kategoriya kontrol yuridicheskogo litsa kak osnovnoy kriteriy formirovaniya gruppy lits // Konkurentnoe pravo. 2014. N 1. S. 8-13.
Gribanov V.P. YUridicheskie litsa. M., 1961.
Ioffe O.S. Razvitie tsivilisticheskoy mysli v SSSR (chast I). L., 1975.
Ioffe O.S. Iz istorii tsivilisticheskoy mysli. TSivilisticheskaya doktrina feodalizma // Ioffe O.S. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu: Iz istorii tsivilisticheskoy mysli. Grazhdanskoe pravootnoshenie. Kritika teorii khozyaystvennogo prava . - 3-e izd., - M.: Statut, 2009.
Kozlova N.V. Ponyatie i sushchnost yuridicheskogo litsa. Ocherk istorii i teorii. M., 2003.
Korporativnoe pravo / Otv.red. I.S. SHitkina - M.: Statut, 2019 Elektronnyy resurs SPS Konsul tant plyus (data obrashcheniya 09.02.2021)
Krasavchikova L.I. Pravovoe polozhenie obshchestva s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost yu po zakonodatel stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Federativnoy Respubliki Germaniya: dis. kand.yurid.nauk - M., 2013 - 225 s.
Laptev V.A. Korporativnoe pravo: pravovaya organizatsiya korporativnykh sistem - M.: Prospekt, 2018. 384 s.
Laptev V.A. Retsessiya pravovoy konstruktsii ogranichennaya otvetstvennost chlenov kommercheskikh korporatsiy // Gosudarstvo i pravo, 2020, № 9. S. 63-72.
Rimskoe chastnoe pravo/ pod red. I.B. Novitskogo I.S. Pereterskogo. - M.: KNORUS, 2013.
Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiyskoy Imperii, T.III. 1689-1699. - Pechatano v Tipografii II Otdeleniya Sobstvennoy Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva Kantselyarii, 1830. - 690 s. Elektronnyy resurs sayt Natsional noy elektronnoy biblioteki http://nlr.ru/e-res/law r/search.php (data obrashcheniya 15.02.2021)
Polnoe sobranie zakonov Rossiyskoy Imperii. T. XXIX. 1806-1807. Pechatano v Tipografii II Otdeleniya Sobstvennoy Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva Kantselyarii. 1830. - Elektronnyy resurs Natsional naya elektronnaya biblioteka http://nlr.ru/e-res/law r/search.php (data obrashcheniya 16.02.2021)
Resheniya grazhdanskogo kassatsionnogo departamenta Pravitel stvuyushchego Senata. 1880. S.-Peterburg: Senatskaya Tipografiya, 1880.
Sayt Ministerstva YUstitsii Germanii - Bundesministerium der Justiz und f r Verbraucherschutz. Elektronnyy resurs http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de (data obrashcheniya - 05.01.2021).
Svod Zakonov Rossiyskoy Imperii. T.XI, chast II Elektronnyy resurs SPS Konsul tant Plyus https://civil.consultant.ru/reprint/books/250/973.html img974 (data obrashcheniya 16.02.2021)
Stuchka P. Problema yuridicheskogo litsa // Revolyutsiya prava,1928, № 1 (yanvar -fevral ).
Tal chikov S.A., SHalyapin S.O. Skladchina kak proobraz prostogo tovarishchestva: istoriko-pravovoy aspekt // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava, 2008, N 22
Tolstoy YU.K. Soderzhanie i grazhdansko-pravovaya zashchita prava sobstvennosti v SSSR. L., 1955. S. 60 - 92.

limited liability company, subsidiary liability, the subsidiary liability of a participant in a limited liability company, people with significant control, person as a subject of business law, family as a subject of law, lifting the corporate veil.