Criminal law analysis of the disposition of the norm on a crime that infringes on the authors ' personal non-property rights
( Pp. 234-237)

On the basis of part 1 of article 44 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, every person living on the territory of our country is granted and guaranteed freedom in the implementation of their literary, scientific, artistic, and technical developments. Ensuring the security and integrity of intellectual, creative, and technical developments of a person is provided for by criminal legislation. The genius of the human mind is the source of many masterpieces of art, creativity, and inventions. These inventions are a kind of guarantee of ensuring an adequate standard of living for the population. The main task of international and Russian legislation is to create and maintain a level of security for the authors of intellectual property objects. The modern Russian state is on the way to improving a democratic society and a stable legal state with a developed system of economic relations and a high level of social security for citizens. This leads to the realization that intellectual property is the main asset of the country, constantly renewed and increased, in contrast to the richness of the natural environment. Therefore, in order to ensure a normal level of development of public relations in the field of intellectual property, it is necessary to develop a powerful and effective mechanism for protecting copyright holders, providing reliable legal protection against criminal encroachments. The main purpose of the research in this area is to improve the theoretical provisions that ensure the security of copyright and related rights by analyzing the criminal law mechanism and making recommendations for constructive changes in the current legislation.

Esenbulatova E.H., Karachaev S.G., (2020), CRIMINAL LAW ANALYSIS OF THE DISPOSITION OF THE NORM ON A CRIME THAT INFRINGES ON THE AUTHORS ' PERSONAL NON-PROPERTY RIGHTS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 234-237.

Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ (red. ot 12.11.2020): prinyat Gos. Dumoy Feder. Sobr. Ros. Federatsii 24 maya 1996 g.: odobr. Sovetom Federatsii Feder. Sobr. Ros. Federatsii 5 iyunya 1996 g.: vvod. Feder. zakonom Ros. Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1997 g. № 64 -FZ Elektronnyy resurs // Ros. gaz. - 1997. - 16 yanv.; Sobr. zakonodatel stva Ros. Federatsii - 17 iyunya -1996 - № 25, - st. 2954. Dostup iz sprav. - pravovoy sistemy Konsul tantPlyus .
Alekseev A.P. Pervonachal nyy etap rassledovaniya prestupleniy, svyazannykh s narusheniem avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav v avdiovizual noy sfere: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.09.- 2013.- 218 s.
Ershov O.G., Karpov K.V. osobennosti kvalifikatsii prestupleniya o narushenii avtorskikh smezhnykh prav//Ugolovnyy protsess.- 2014. - № 2 (110).- S. 72-77.
Illarionova V. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost za narushenie avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav, izobretatel skikh i patentnykh prav// sbornik k 25 letiyu konstitutsionnogo razvitiya Rossii i problemy gosudarstvennogo upravleniya. Materialy mezhvuzovskoy nauchno- prakticheskoy konferentsii.- 2018.- S.- 195-199.
Lopashenko A.N. Problemy bor by s ekonomicheskoy prestupnost yu, zakonodatel nyy aspekt. Zakonomernost prestupnosti, strategiya bor by i zakon. - M., 2001.- 327 s.
Sevidov A.A., Skorobogat ko V.YU. Otdel nye osobennosti nachal nogo etapa dosudubnogo rassledovaniya narusheniy avtorskikh prava i smezhnykh prav// Mezhdunarodnyy nauchnyy zhurnal internauka. Seriya: YUridicheskie nauki.- 2017.- №3 (3). - S. 65-69.
Filippov P.A. Ugolovno-pravovaya zashchita prav intellektual noy sobstvennosti: dis. kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08.- 2003.- 218 s.

Copyright, related rights, violation, crime, legislation.