Artificial Intelligence and Criminal Justice Principles: Compatibility Issues
( Pp. 430-436)

The penetration of artificial intelligence technologies (hereinafter referred to as AI) into criminal justice naturally entails the modernization of legal systems, with the introduction of "smart courts", "digital prosecutors", as, for example, in China, and the increasing decision-making autonomy of AI. The aim of the study is to study the impact of AI on the fundamental principles of the criminal process. Should the use of AI be “tailored” to existing principles and norms, or should existing principles and norms be modified to accommodate AI? Based on the analysis of the principles with their development in specific norms and situations, it was concluded that the properties of AI that cause negative consequences of its use in criminal proceedings (bias, closeness (opacity), pose potential threats to the implementation of the principles of the criminal process. AI affects the basic constitutional principles and the branch principles of criminal proceedings interconnected with them.The use of AI poses a certain threat for them, entailing a violation of the constitutional rights of a person and a citizen. The purpose of this article is to draw the attention of the scientific community, the legislator, and law enforcers to the problem of dissonance between AI and the principles of criminal justice that has arisen and is growing with the development of AI technologies. In order to avoid negative factors in the use of AI, it is necessary to establish a legal regulatory framework for its use in criminal proceedings, due to the socio-technical nature of AI. Given the priority of human and civil rights, legal norms must be transformed in such a way as to ensure proper protection of the rights of citizens.

Papysheva E.S., (2022), ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE PRINCIPLES: COMPATIBILITY ISSUES. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 5 => 430-436.

Borisova L.V. Electronic justice as a form of judicial protection in Russia // Actual problems of Russian law. 2020. No. 6. P. 105 - 111.
Volodina L.M. Appointment and principles of criminal justice - the basis of the moral principles of criminal procedure // Bulletin of the University named after O.E. Kutafin (MSUA). 2018. No. 2(42). S. 18.
Golovko L.V. State and its criminal justice. Moscow. 2022. 459 p.
Granat N.L. Legal and moral - psychological foundations for ensuring the rule of law during the preliminary investigation. Abstract dis...doc. legal Sciences. Moscow. 1992.
Grachev S.A. The secret of telephone conversations in the legal positions of the highest judicial instances of Russia: a conflict of interpretations // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2020. No. 2. P. 81 - 85.
Dedov D.I., Gadzhiev Kh.I. Commentary on the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case "Breuer v. Germany" // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2020. No. 5. P. 112 - 123.
Rossinsky S.B. On the practice of implementing the criminal procedure principle of protecting the rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen in the course of investigative actions // Actual problems of Russian law. 2017. No. 8. P. 133 - 141.
Fokov A.P. Electronic Justice in the Digital Economy in Russia and Foreign Countries: Innovations and Prospects for the Development of Legislation // Justice of the Peace. 2021. No. 12. P. 2 - 6. DOI: 10.18572/2072-4152-2021-12-2-6
Khabrieva T.Ya. Identification of law in modern social regulation // Questions of Philosophy. 2021. No. 12. P. 5 - 17
Khaydarov A.A. Illegal practice of fixing personal correspondence of citizens on mobile devices // Criminal process. 2017. No. 5. P. 36 - 41;
Cherepanova O.S. The right to the inviolability of the home and the right to housing: legal nature, correlation and civil law consequences of the violation // Family and housing law. 2018. No. 5. P. 45 - 48.
Chernogor N.N. Artificial intelligence and its role in the transformation of the modern legal order // Journal of Russian Law. 2022. No. 4. S. 5 - 15.
Barabas, C. 2021. Beyond Bias: Reimagining the Terms Ethical AI in Criminal Law. Georgetwon Law.
Candrian, C., Schere, A. 2022. Rise of the Machines: Delegating Decisions to Autonomous AI. Computers in Human Behaviour. September, 2022.
De Cremer, D. 2022. Machines are not moral role models. Nature Machine Behavior.
Jack Newman, 2021. China develops AI prosecutor that can identify dissent and press charges for common crimes with 97 accuracy . Daily Mail. URL: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10346933/China-develops-AI-prosecutor-press-charges-97-accuracy.html
McCorduck, P. 2004. Machines who think: A personal inquiry into the history and prospects of artificial intelligence. CRC Press.
Pleasence, C. 2022. China uses AI to improve courts - with computers correcting perceived human errors in a verdict and JUDGES forced to submit a written explanation to the MACHINE if they disagree. Daily Mail. URL: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11010077/Chinese-courts-allow-AI-make-rulings-charge-people-carry-punishments.html; https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11010077/Chinese-courts-allow-AI-make-rulings-charge-people-carry-punishments.html
Sarah Dai, 2020. Shanghai judicial courts start to replace clerks with AI assistants. South China Morning Post. URL: https://www.scmp.com/tech/innovation/article/3077979/shanghai-judicial-courts-start-replace-clerks-ai-assistants
Stphen Chen, 2021. Chinese scientists develop AI prosecutor that can press its own charges. South Shina Morning Post. URL: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3160997/chinese-scientists-develop-ai-prosecutor-can-press-its-own

algorithmic justice, artificial intelligence, principles of criminal justice, regulatory framework, digital evidence.