ON TWO WITNESSES IN ONE PERSON IN THE COURT JURY MEETINGS
( Pp. 213-215)
More about authors
Kalinkina Lyubov Danilovna
Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor, Honorary Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Republic of Mordovia, Head of the Criminal Procedure, Justice and prosecutorial supervision Department, Law institute
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation
National Research Ogarev Mordovia State University
Saransk, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article deals with the use of the testimony of the same witness when he is interrogated in a criminal case under different data about his personality under conditions of his visual observation and under conditions that exclude his visual observation under a pseudonym. The author analyzed the problem when artificially created the appearance of the presence of different evidence from different carriers and by this the jurors are misled as two independent proofs.
How to Cite:
Kalinkina L.D., (2017), ON TWO WITNESSES IN ONE PERSON IN THE COURT JURY MEETINGS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 4 => 213-215.
Reference list:
Sm.: Ugolovnoe delo № T. 20. S.8-11 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo suda RM. 2017.
2. Cm: Tam zhe. T.20. S.10.
Sm.: Tam zhe. T.54. S.199-208.
4. Sm.: Tam zhe. T.54. S.206.
5. Sm.: Tam zhe. T.54. C.182.
6. Sm.: Tam zhe. T.54. 184.
2. Cm: Tam zhe. T.20. S.10.
Sm.: Tam zhe. T.54. S.199-208.
4. Sm.: Tam zhe. T.54. S.206.
5. Sm.: Tam zhe. T.54. C.182.
6. Sm.: Tam zhe. T.54. 184.
