«Technical Company» as an Evidence in Disputes of Unreasonable Tax Benefit
( Pp. 29-35)
More about authors
Orlova Natalia A.
Advisor to the State Civil Service of the Russian Federation, Grade 2, Deputy Head, Postgraduate Student of the Department of International and Public Law of the Faculty of Law, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Financial university), Russia, Moscow. Hirsch Index - 1
Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation No. 17 for the Moscow Region
Lyubertsy, Russia
Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of the Russian Federation No. 17 for the Moscow Region
Lyubertsy, Russia
Abstract:
Purpose of the study. The relevance of the problem under consideration is beyond doubt, since more than 90 percent of all tax offenses and economic crimes related to tax evasion, fraud, illegal banking activities are based on the involvement in economic circulation of nominal structures, a single name for which has not been developed either by science or practice, which is a serious gap not only in matters of proof, but also in the suppression of offenses and crimes. The criteria for nominal structures applied by the tax authorities do not correspond to reality, which leads to an incorrect assessment of the validity of the application of the tax benefit. Conclusions. In the course of the study, a reasonable choice was made of the most appropriate term for the nominal structures used in taxation, a definition of a «technical» company was developed, which makes it possible to take into account the most basic features that are basic for various types of such structures, the use of which will not allow the erroneous classification of independent business entities as categories of nominal structures. The generalization of law enforcement practice made it possible to identify the circumstances that must be proven when using «technical» companies to minimize taxes, the use of which will improve the efficiency of tax control and exclude unreasonable prosecution of taxpayers.
How to Cite:
Orlova N. A. «Technical Company» as an Evidence in Disputes of Unreasonable Tax Benefit // ECONOMIC PROBLEMS AND LEGAL PRACTICE. 2023. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 29-35. (in Russ.) EDN: XLGHTI
Reference list:
Vasilyeva, N.S. The expediency of applying a probabilistic proactive approach to the allocation of one-day firms by external non-specialized stakeholders. // Development of territories. 2021. No. 2 (24). —Pp. 36–58.
Viskova, E. O. Mechanisms for evaluating unscrupulous counterparties as self-defense against additional tax charges // Science and business: ways of development. 2016. No 8 (62). —Pp. 52–55.
Grishin, A. V. The role of one-day firms in the economy and the tax system of Russia and ways to deal with them // Publishing House of BSUEP, 2012. —298 p. / A. V. Grishin, —p. 53–58.
Davletshina A.I. «Cleanliness of the environment» as a tool for the VAT tax gap // M., 2019. P. 60–67.
Zykov, S. V., Filimonova, A. M. Unscrupulous counterparty // Vector of Economics. 2017. No 2 (8). —P. 1.
Mergenova, A.A. Ensuring the financial information of the Russian Federation through the adoption of new legislative measures to suppress «one-day» firms (experience 2016–2018) // Voronezh Institute of Economics and Law, 2018. —364 p. / A. A. Mergenova, —p. 323–329.
Poputarovsky, O. The danger of using a one-day firm // Taxes and tax planning, 2012, No. 4. —p. 38.
Solovyov, I.N. Dangerous financial schemes: one-day firms. // M., Prospekt, 2012. —88 p.
Urman, N.A. Interaction of tax authorities and internal affairs authorities in the fight against «one-day» firms // Publishing House of the Khakass State University N.F. Katanov, 2016. —176 p. / N.F. Kuznetsova, —P. 93–95.
Utkina, A. V. One-day firms as a threat to the economic security of Russia // Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2015. No. 4–3 (13). —c. 65–68.
Viskova, E. O. Mechanisms for evaluating unscrupulous counterparties as self-defense against additional tax charges // Science and business: ways of development. 2016. No 8 (62). —Pp. 52–55.
Grishin, A. V. The role of one-day firms in the economy and the tax system of Russia and ways to deal with them // Publishing House of BSUEP, 2012. —298 p. / A. V. Grishin, —p. 53–58.
Davletshina A.I. «Cleanliness of the environment» as a tool for the VAT tax gap // M., 2019. P. 60–67.
Zykov, S. V., Filimonova, A. M. Unscrupulous counterparty // Vector of Economics. 2017. No 2 (8). —P. 1.
Mergenova, A.A. Ensuring the financial information of the Russian Federation through the adoption of new legislative measures to suppress «one-day» firms (experience 2016–2018) // Voronezh Institute of Economics and Law, 2018. —364 p. / A. A. Mergenova, —p. 323–329.
Poputarovsky, O. The danger of using a one-day firm // Taxes and tax planning, 2012, No. 4. —p. 38.
Solovyov, I.N. Dangerous financial schemes: one-day firms. // M., Prospekt, 2012. —88 p.
Urman, N.A. Interaction of tax authorities and internal affairs authorities in the fight against «one-day» firms // Publishing House of the Khakass State University N.F. Katanov, 2016. —176 p. / N.F. Kuznetsova, —P. 93–95.
Utkina, A. V. One-day firms as a threat to the economic security of Russia // Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2015. No. 4–3 (13). —c. 65–68.
Keywords:
technical company, subject of proof, tax process, evidence, proof..
Related Articles
PUBLIC LAW (STATE LAW) Pages: 14-19 Issue №72283
Expanding Powers of Higher Tax Authorities in Tax Process at the Stage of Resolving the Issue of Acceptance of Complaint for Consideration
tax process
stage
tax authorities
taxpayer
court
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 146-149 Issue №13916
CONTENT OF THE SUBJECT OF PROOF WHEN DISCLOSING INFORMATION ON SAFETY MEASURES OF PARTICIPANTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
security
protection of witnesses and victims
criminal case
criminal justice
opposition to investigation
Show more
public law (state law) Pages: 310-316 Issue №23752
Collecting Reliable and Admissible Evidence in Tax Process by Engaging Specialist
specialist
conclusion
means of proof
tax process
evidence.
Show more
5. PUBLIC LAW (STATE LAW) (5.1.2.) Pages: 260-266 Issue №21729
Expertise as a Form of Evidence in the Tax Process
expertise
evidence
tax process
means of proof
decision
Show more
CRIMINAL LAW (5.1.4.) Pages: 233-238 Issue №24238
Concept and Classification of Evidence Presented During Interrogation
evidence
interrogation
credibility
admissibility
relativity
Show more
INTERNATIONAL LAW Pages: 273-279 Issue №24870
The Impact of Information Technology on the Process of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
information technologies
criminal proceedings
evidence
proving
artificial intelligence technologies
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 158-161 Issue №5413
BODY SEARCH IN THE CONTEXT OF APPROPRIATE MEANS OF COLLECTING PHYSICAL EVIDENCES IN PRE-TRIAL INQUIRY
personal search
the detention of the suspect
evidence
the proper way of gathering evidence
pre-trial criminal proceedings
Show more
SPECIALTY 12.00.04 Pages: 182-186 Issue №14694
LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF TAX PROCESS
principle
tax process
democracy
justice
legal process
Show more
7. Criminal procedure Pages: 165-168 Issue №16219
PROBLEM ASPECTS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE ARISING IN THE PRODUCTION OF presenting FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND offers FOR MINIMIZING THEM
identification
evidence
presentation for identification
investigative action
Show more
7. CRIMINAL PROCESS (12.00.09) Pages: 219-222 Issue №17401
Some features of evidence in the investigation of crimes committed by minors
minors
criminal case
evidence
investigation
proof
Show more