Social disadvantage families in repelling domestic media
(86-89)

More about authors
Borovikova Viktoria V. PhD, docent, degree of the chair of criminology, Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Annotation:
This paper is devoted to problems of social disadvantage reflection family Russian media. The purpose of writing − show lighting problem of domestic violence in the Russian media Foreign specialists involved in research of these scientific issues: Adorno T., Johnson D., Carpenter E., Horkheimer M. Methodology − This article uses the following methods of scientific research: statistical, content analysis, expert evaluation method Conclusions: Domestic media in general properly illuminate issues of family violence. However, there are journalists, on the one hand, the exaggeration of some family conflicts, on the other − their underestimation. Undoubtedly, the focus of the media should be the problem of suicide among adolescents and the elderly. Scope of the study: The study results are preliminary and suggests further study of the problem of domestic violence in accordance with a specially developed program. Practical significance − this job is that it "signals" the relevant state bodies and public organizations that the social institution of the family in the Russian Federation is currently experiencing a serious crisis and need for effective measures to remove it from this state Social consequences − worded provisions in the article may be used in the development of areas of family policy in the Russian Federation and the relevant measures to prevent domestic violence Originality publication − is new approaches to the definition of the mass media in the prevention of family violence. This article will be useful for journalists covering the problems of domestic violence, as well as law enforcement officials in the prevention of crime
How to Cite:
Borovikova V.V., (2014), SOCIAL DISADVANTAGE FAMILIES IN REPELLING DOMESTIC MEDIA. Business in Law, 3: 86-89.
Reference list:
. // . 2012. № 6
: - / . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . .- .: , 2011.
. // . ., 2012. 24
. . // XX . 2012. № 7.
. // . . 2013. 23 .
. - // . ., 2012. 2 .
. // . 2013. № 36
. ., . . , : .- .: , 2011.
. . // №4 2013, . 126-129
. . // №5 2013, . 179-182
Keywords:
family, media, Internet, prevention of crimes, minors, suicide.