Method for Diagnostic of Infrastructure Conflict and Monitoring of Information Security of Critical Information Infrastructure
( Pp. 145-158)
More about authors
Kochedykov Sergey S.
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor; associate professor, Department of Information Security, associate professor, Department of KB-4 Intelligent Information Security Systems; MIREA – Russian Technological University
National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute” (MPEI)
Moscow, Russian Federation
National Research University “Moscow Power Engineering Institute” (MPEI)
Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The article discusses the problem of the limitations of traditional information security monitoring in ensuring the stability of critical information infrastructure. It substantiates the need to transition from event-oriented control to the diagnosis of system states of an infrastructure conflict. The concepts of infrastructure state, vulnerabilities of infrastructure genesis, the threat of an infrastructure conflict, and the diagnostic function of conflict are formalized. A dynamic model of the evolution of a conflict state, phase classification, a Markov model of transitions, and an integral indicator of redundancy are developed. The DIAG–IC–STATE algorithm is proposed for integrating diagnostics and monitoring into the contours of information security management systems and infrastructure conflict management systems. It is shown that the proposed approach ensures the transition to adaptive security management of critical information infrastructure.
How to Cite:
Kochedykov S.S. Method for diagnostic of infrastructure conflict and monitoring of information security of critical information infrastructure. Computational Nanotechnology. 13, 1 (2026), 145–158. DOI: 10.33693/2313-223X-2026-13-1-145-158. EDN: NBBCJB
Reference list:
Voevodin V.A. On the problem of assessing the stability of critical information infrastructure. Cybersecurity Issues. 2025. No. 1 (65). Pp. 41–49. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2025-1-41-49.
Dushkin A.V., Kochedykov S.S., Novoseltsev V.I. Analysis of conflict interaction of executive devices of automated control systems. Industrial ACS and Controllers. 2017. No. 10. Pp. 8–16. (In Rus.)
Evnevich E.L., Fatkieva R.R. Modeling of information processes in the context of conflicts. Cybersecurity Issues. 2020. No. 2 (36). Pp. 42–49. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2020-2-42-49.
Izrailov K.E., Buinevich M.V. A method for detecting attacks of various origins on complex objects based on state information. Part 1. Prerequisites and scheme. Cybersecurity Issues. 2023. No. 3 (55). Pp. 90–100. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2023-3-90-100.
Izrailov K.E., Buinevich M.V. A method for detecting attacks of various origins on complex objects based on state information. Part 2. Algorithm, model, and experiment. Cybersecurity Issues. 2023. No. 4 (56). Pp. 80–93. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2023-4-80-93.
Kotenko I.V., Saenko I.B., Zakharenko R.I., Velichko D.V. Subsystem for preventing computer attacks on critical information infrastructure: Analysis of functioning and implementation. Cybersecurity Issues. 2023. No. 1 (53). Pp. 13–27. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2023-1-13-27.
Kochedykov S.S. Infrastructure conflict of critical information infrastructure software under destructive cyberattacks. Computational Nanotechnology. 2025. Vol. 12. No. 4. Pp. 143–154. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.33693/2313-223X-2025-12-4-143-154. EDN: HJYCWE
Kubarev A.V., Lapsar A.P., Asyutikov A.A. Synthesis of a model of a critical information infrastructure object for the safe functioning of a technical system under destructive information influence. Cybersecurity Issues. 2020. No. 6 (40). Pp. 48–56. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2020-06-48-56.
Lavrova D.S., Zegzhda D.P., Zaitseva E.A. Modeling the network infrastructure of complex objects to solve the problem of countering cyberattacks. Cybersecurity Issues. 2019. No. 2 (30). Pp. 13–20. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2019-2-13-20.
Makarenko S.I. Methodology for justifying test information and technical actions that ensure rational completeness of the security audit of a critical information infrastructure object. Cybersecurity Issues. 2021. No. 6 (46). Pp. 12–25. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2021-6-12-25.
Maksimova E.A. Axiomatics of the subject of critical information infrastructure’s infrastructure destructivism. Informatization and Communication. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 68–74. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.34219/2078-8320-2022-13-1-68-74.
Maksimova E.A. Analysis of the life cycle of a critical information infrastructure entity in the context of infrastructure destructivism. Information Protection. Inside. 2021. No. 5 (101). Pp. 4–10. (In Rus.)
Maksimova E.A., Buinevich M.V. Method for assessing the infrastructure sustainability of critical information infrastructure subjects. Bulletin of the Ural Federal District. Information Security. 2022. No. 1 (43). Pp. 50–63. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.14529/secur220107.
Maksimova E.A., Buinevich M.V., Shestakov A.V. Proactive management of information security of critical information infrastructure subjects as complex organizational systems with dynamically changing structure. The Bulletin of Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 49–59. (In Rus.)
Parshutkin A.V. Conceptual model of interaction of conflicting information and telecommunication systems. Cybersecurity Issues. 2014. No. 5 (8). Pp. 2–6. (In Rus.)
Cherevan A.S., Lapsar A.P. Problems of floating vulnerabilities in ensuring the security of mobile applications. Information Technology Security. 2024. Vol. 31. No. 2. Pp. 111–120. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.26583/bit.2024.2.07.
Kochedykov S.S., Grechishnikov E.V., Dushkin A.V., Orlova D.E. The mathematical model of cyber attacks on the critical information system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. Vol. 1202. Pp. 12013. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1202/1/012013.
Dushkin A.V., Kochedykov S.S., Novoseltsev V.I. Analysis of conflict interaction of executive devices of automated control systems. Industrial ACS and Controllers. 2017. No. 10. Pp. 8–16. (In Rus.)
Evnevich E.L., Fatkieva R.R. Modeling of information processes in the context of conflicts. Cybersecurity Issues. 2020. No. 2 (36). Pp. 42–49. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2020-2-42-49.
Izrailov K.E., Buinevich M.V. A method for detecting attacks of various origins on complex objects based on state information. Part 1. Prerequisites and scheme. Cybersecurity Issues. 2023. No. 3 (55). Pp. 90–100. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2023-3-90-100.
Izrailov K.E., Buinevich M.V. A method for detecting attacks of various origins on complex objects based on state information. Part 2. Algorithm, model, and experiment. Cybersecurity Issues. 2023. No. 4 (56). Pp. 80–93. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2023-4-80-93.
Kotenko I.V., Saenko I.B., Zakharenko R.I., Velichko D.V. Subsystem for preventing computer attacks on critical information infrastructure: Analysis of functioning and implementation. Cybersecurity Issues. 2023. No. 1 (53). Pp. 13–27. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2023-1-13-27.
Kochedykov S.S. Infrastructure conflict of critical information infrastructure software under destructive cyberattacks. Computational Nanotechnology. 2025. Vol. 12. No. 4. Pp. 143–154. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.33693/2313-223X-2025-12-4-143-154. EDN: HJYCWE
Kubarev A.V., Lapsar A.P., Asyutikov A.A. Synthesis of a model of a critical information infrastructure object for the safe functioning of a technical system under destructive information influence. Cybersecurity Issues. 2020. No. 6 (40). Pp. 48–56. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2020-06-48-56.
Lavrova D.S., Zegzhda D.P., Zaitseva E.A. Modeling the network infrastructure of complex objects to solve the problem of countering cyberattacks. Cybersecurity Issues. 2019. No. 2 (30). Pp. 13–20. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2019-2-13-20.
Makarenko S.I. Methodology for justifying test information and technical actions that ensure rational completeness of the security audit of a critical information infrastructure object. Cybersecurity Issues. 2021. No. 6 (46). Pp. 12–25. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.21681/2311-3456-2021-6-12-25.
Maksimova E.A. Axiomatics of the subject of critical information infrastructure’s infrastructure destructivism. Informatization and Communication. 2022. No. 1. Pp. 68–74. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.34219/2078-8320-2022-13-1-68-74.
Maksimova E.A. Analysis of the life cycle of a critical information infrastructure entity in the context of infrastructure destructivism. Information Protection. Inside. 2021. No. 5 (101). Pp. 4–10. (In Rus.)
Maksimova E.A., Buinevich M.V. Method for assessing the infrastructure sustainability of critical information infrastructure subjects. Bulletin of the Ural Federal District. Information Security. 2022. No. 1 (43). Pp. 50–63. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.14529/secur220107.
Maksimova E.A., Buinevich M.V., Shestakov A.V. Proactive management of information security of critical information infrastructure subjects as complex organizational systems with dynamically changing structure. The Bulletin of Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2023. No. 2. Pp. 49–59. (In Rus.)
Parshutkin A.V. Conceptual model of interaction of conflicting information and telecommunication systems. Cybersecurity Issues. 2014. No. 5 (8). Pp. 2–6. (In Rus.)
Cherevan A.S., Lapsar A.P. Problems of floating vulnerabilities in ensuring the security of mobile applications. Information Technology Security. 2024. Vol. 31. No. 2. Pp. 111–120. (In Rus.). DOI: 10.26583/bit.2024.2.07.
Kochedykov S.S., Grechishnikov E.V., Dushkin A.V., Orlova D.E. The mathematical model of cyber attacks on the critical information system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. Vol. 1202. Pp. 12013. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1202/1/012013.
Keywords:
adaptive control, state diagnostics, infrastructure conflict, critical information infrastructure, Markov model, information security monitoring, Petri–Markov network, infrastructure vulnerabilities.
