PATERNALISTIC ATTITUDES AS DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION PHENOMENA
( Pp. 167-170)

More about authors
Mukhamedyarova Leysyan V. starshiy prepodavatel kafedry professionalnoy podgotovki
Ufa Law Institute of the Russian Interior Ministry
Abstract:
Objective: In this article the problem of corruption is indicated at this stage, considered the phenomenon of paternalism as a factor in determining the different types of corruption. The reason for writing this article was the growth of corruption. Method or methodology of work: The dialectical method to the knowledge of the social and social phenomena allowed to analyze corruption and paternalistic attitudes as determinants of its manifestations in the contemporary socio-cultural landscape, the phenomenological method was instrumental in establishing the differences of corruption in the society, as well as a comparative analysis, through which compared the opposing forms of being human. Results: expressed in this article are the value judgments and recommendations are aimed at disclosure of paternalistic attitudes in society as a determinant of corruption phenomena. Application of the results: is that the main provisions and conclusions of the article can be used in scientific, educational and practical activities in addressing and analyzing the various transformations of social relations that take place in modern times, including in terms of the corruption of action.
How to Cite:
Mukhamedyarova L.V., (2016), PATERNALISTIC ATTITUDES AS DETERMINANTS OF CORRUPTION PHENOMENA. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 167-170.
Reference list:
Anikin V.A. Osobennost zhiznennykh tsennostey i ustremleniy rossiyan // Politicheskie issledovaniya. - 2008. - № 2. S. 86-88.
Kagarlitskiy B. Paternalizm i liberalizm // Logos. - 2014. - № 2.
Kibardina L.N. Osobennosti paternalistskoy modeli rossiyskogo sotsial nogo gosudarstva // Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik. - Omsk : Izd-vo OmGTU, 2010. - № 4.
Norkin K.B. Sistemnye problemy bor by s korruptsiey v Rossii. Nezadacha: varim yaytsa vsmyatku chas, varim dva, a oni vsye krutye. - M., 2010.
Nyun kova A.YU. Korruptsiya kak ugroza natsional noy bezopasnosti Rossii // Sledovatel . - 2010. - № 8. - S. 52.
Romanov P.M. Menedzhment kak forma sotsial noy praktiki: avtoref. dis. k. sotsiol.n. - Saratov, 2000.
Sulimin A. Vlastnaya traditsiya v sotsiodinamike sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva // Vlast . - 2009. - № 12;
Temnitskiy A.L. Orientatsii rabochikh na paternalistskie i partnerskie otnosheniya s rukovodstvom // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. - 2004. - № 6.
CHervonnykh E.V. Korruptsiya v Rossiyskoy meditsine: masshtaby i puti protivodeystviya ey // Sledovatel . - 2010. - № 4. S. 55-56.
Colazingari S., Rose-Ackerman S. Corruption in a Paternalistic Democracy: Lessons from Italy for Latin America // Political Science Quarterly. - 1998. -Vol. 113. - № 3;
New Bill. Paternalism and Public Policy // Economics and Philosophy. - 1999. - № 15;
Leonard C. Thomas, Goldfarb S. Robert, Suranovic M. Steven. New on Paternalism and Public Policy // Economics and Philosophy. - 2000. - № 16.
Keywords:
corruption, paternalism, determinants of corruption behavior.