Modern history.To the question about the readiness of Russian historical science in the 1990s to the perception of foreign theories (for example theories of modernization)
( Pp. 147-151)

More about authors
Vladimir D. Kamynin
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation Lichman Boris V. doktor istoricheskih nauk, professor, zav. kafedroy istoricheskih disciplin Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, Zasluzhennyy rabotnik Vysshey shkoly RF, chlen Nauchno-metodicheskogo soveta po istorii ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki RF, prorektor Uralskogo instituta ekonomiki, upravleniya i prava, professor kafedry teorii i istorii mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy departamenta mezhdunarodnyh otnosheniy Uralskogo gumanitarnogo instituta Uralskogo federalnogo universiteta im. B.N. Elcina
Ural Federal University named after B.N. Yeltsin
Abstract:
The article analyzes the experience of Soviet scientists with foreign theories of modernization, highlights the stages of perception in the USSR these theories reveals the discourse in relation to these theories. It is concluded that in Soviet times, social scientists could get acquainted with the various theories of modernization and their heuristic possibilities for the study of the historical process in General and peculiarities of Russian history. The reason for this was that of modernization theory, especially in the classic variant, was not considered in Soviet times as a uniquely «class-alien». A relatively good familiarity of Soviet scientists with theories of modernization was not the only reason for their rapid spread in the Russian social Sciences in the 1990s, but has left a strong imprint on their interpretation.
How to Cite:
Vladimir D.K., Lichman B.V., (2018), MODERN HISTORY.TO THE QUESTION ABOUT THE READINESS OF RUSSIAN HISTORICAL SCIENCE IN THE 1990S TO THE PERCEPTION OF FOREIGN THEORIES (FOR EXAMPLE THEORIES OF MODERNIZATION). Sociopolitical Sciences, 1 => 147-151.
Reference list:
Alevras N. N. V. V. Adamov i problemy industrial noy modernizatsii gornozavodskogo Urala // Sotsial no-ekonomicheskoe i politicheskoe razvitie Urala v KHIKH - KHKH vv. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural.un-ta, 2004. S. 14 - 24.
Velichko O. I., Olegina I. N. Industrializatsiya SSSR i ee traktovka v sovremennoy burzhuaznoy sovetologii // Kritika burzhuaznoy istoriografii sovetskogo obshchestva / Pod red. V. S. Vasyukova. M.: Politizdat, 1972. S. 136 - 199.
Gurevich A. YA. Istoriya istorika. M.: ROSSPEN, 2004. 288 s.
Zav yalova O. O. Otechestvennyy opyt izucheniya istorii Rossii imperskogo perioda v kontekste teorii modernizatsii // Istoricheskaya i sotsial no-obrazovatel naya mysl . 2017. Tom. 9. №6. CHast 1. S. 52 - 61.
Zaytseva E. A., Savchenko I. A. Marksmodernizm, ili svobodnye rassuzhdeniya o vliyanii marksizma na kontseptsii modernizatsii // Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. №1. T. 1. S. 25 - 31.
Igritskiy YU. I. Mify burzhuaznoy istoriografii i real nost istorii. Sovremennaya amerikanskaya i angliyskaya istoriografiya Velikoy Oktyabr skoy sotsialisticheskoy revolyutsii. M.: Izd-vo Mysl , 1974. 272 s.
Karpachev M. D. Istoki rossiyskoy revolyutsii: legendy i real nost . M.: Mysl , 1990. 269 s.
Kakhk YU. O nekotorykh problemakh metodologii istoricheskikh issledovaniy i o poiskakh osnovnogo dvigatelya istoricheskogo protsessa (Razmyshleniya v svyazi s prochteniem monografii akad. I. D. Koval chenko) // Izvestiya AN Estonii. Obshchestvennye nauki. 1990. №3. S. 307 - 321.
Kritika burzhuaznoy istoriografii sovetskogo obshchestva / Pod red. V. S. Vasyukova. M.: Politizdat, 1972. 412 s.
Kritika teorii modernizatsii: nauchno-analiticheskiy obzor / L. B. Volkov. M.: INION,1985. 77 s.
Krupina T. D. Teoriya modernizatsii i nekotorye problemy razvitiya Rossii kontsa XIX - nachala XX v. // Istoriya SSSR. 1971. №1. S. 191 - 205.
Marushkin B. I. Istoriya i politika: Amerikanskaya burzhuaznaya istoriografiya sovetskogo obshchestva. M.: Nauka, 1969. 395 s.
Marushkin B. I., Ioffe G. Z., Romanovskiy N. V. Tri revolyutsii v Rossii i burzhuaznaya istoriografiya. M.: Mysl , 1977. 280 s.
Mitrokhin L. N. Filosofy i religiya // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. №9. S. 16 - 35.
Potkina I.V., Selunskaya N.B. Rossiya i modernizatsiya (V prochtenii zapadnykh uchenykh) // Istoriya SSSR. 1990. №4. S. 194 - 207.
Rossiyskaya modernizatsiya: problemy i perspektivy. Materialy kruglogo stola . Vystupali: A.S. Akhiezer, L. S. Vasil ev. V. G. KHoros, M. A. CHeshkov, V. V. Sumskiy, A. A. Kara-Murza, L. A. Sedov, S. YA. Matveeva, D. E. Furman, A. S. Panarin, E. B. Rashkovskiy, V. A. YAdov // Voprosy filosofii 1993. №7. S. 3 - 39.
Semenov V. S. Problemy sotsial noy zhizni obshchestva // Sotsiologiya i ideologiya. M.: Nauka, 1969. S. 190 - 201.
Sovremennye burzhuaznye teorii obshchestvennogo razvitiya / Otv. red. YA. M. Berger. M.: Nauka,1984. 256 s.
Tetyushev V. I. Stanovlenie i razvitie ekonomiki SSSR i burzhuaznye kritiki. M.: Politizdat, 1987. 271 s.
Keywords:
of modernization theory, Soviet social science, features of the Russian historical process.


Related Articles