Some problems criminal-legal regulation complicity in crime
( Pp. 79-83)

The purpose. With the redheads of numerous problems existing in the theory of criminal law and law enforcement practice, according to a number of scientific and educational workers, officer of the inquiry, investigation, prosecutor's office and the courtier, one of the most pressing and complex issues stands out the problem of criminal-legal regulation of complicity in crime. The scientific literature rightly draws attention to the various forms of participation in the commission of a crime of several persons, including complicity, characterized by increased public danger. Deliberate joint participation of two or more people in the commission of a deliberate criminal act greatly facilitates its commission, gives them the opportunity to cause more serious harm. Complicity in a crime often causes difficulties in determining the criminal assessment of each of the accomplices. In no small measure, this is due to the fact that the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not fully regulate some important issues of complicity. Therefore, the purpose of this scientific article is to develop and formulate socially conditioned proposals to improve the current Russian criminal law in terms of ensuring a uniform interpretation of some problems complicity, on which the correct qualification of the criminal act committed in complicity depends. The findings. The head-legal regulation of some problems of complicity in crime does not fully allow to answer the questions arising in law enforcement practice. In particular, the rules of the criminal law on complicity do not give an unequivocal answer to the question whether there is complicity in the caseate, if out of several persons involved in the commission of a criminal act, only one person is recognized as the subject of the crime. In addition, the criminal-legal regulation of complicity in the crime does not contain questions about the specifics of the grounds of criminal liability organizer, incited me and accomplices well. With this in mind, proposals have been formulated to improve some of the rules of complicity.

Bazarov R.A., (2020), SOME PROBLEMS CRIMINAL-LEGAL REGULATION COMPLICITY IN CRIME. Sociopolitical Sciences, 2 => 79-83.

Gavrilov B.YA. Sovremennaya ugolovnaya politika Rossii. TSifry i fakty. M.: Prospekt; TK Velbi, 2008. 208 c.
Esakov G. Kvalifikatsiya sovmestnogo soversheniya prestupleniya s litsom, ne podlezhashchim ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: novyy povorot v sudebnoy praktike // Ugolovnoe pravo. M.: ANO YUridicheskie programmy . 2011. № 2. S. 10-15.
Kovalev M.I. Souchastie v prestuplenii: monografiya. Ekaterinburg: Ural skaya gos. yurid. akad., 1999. 202 s.
Kozlov A.P. Souchastie: traditsii i real nost . SPb.: YUrid. tsentr Press, 2001. 362 c.
Petrov S.V. Novyy vzglyad na klassifikatsiyu souchastiya v prestuplenii // YUridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel naya praktika. 2015. № 1 (31). S. 60-65.
Rarog A.I. Problemy kvalifikatsii prestupleniy po sub ektivnym priznakam. M.: Prospekt, 2015. 232 s.
Sostoyanie prestupnosti v Rossii za yanvar -dekabr 2019 goda. M.: GIATS MVD Rossii, 2020. 66 s.
Ugolovnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod obshch. red. A.E. ZHalinskogo. V 3 t. T. 1. Obshchaya chast . M., 2011. 863 s.
Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii. Obshchaya chast : uchebnik / pod red. N.M. Kropachev, B.V. Volzhenkina, V.V. Orekhova. SPb., 2006. 1064 s.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Ukrainy ot 5 aprelya 2001 goda № 2341-III (red. ot 06.12.19) // Onlin.zakon. URL: https://online. zakon.kz/Document/ doc id
SHarapov R.D. Sovmestnaya prestupnaya deyatel nost bez priznakov souchastiya: posredstvennoe ispolnenie, neostorozhnoe soprichinenie // YUridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel naya praktika. 2015. № 2. S. 31-38.
SHarapov R.D. Souchastie v prestuplenii: zakon, teoriya, praktika // Portal nauchnykh zhurnalov MGYUA. 2016. S. 105-120. URL: http://portal-msal.ru/10-17803/1729-5920-2016- 119-10-105-115

criminal law, complicity in a crime, the subject of a crime, the basis of criminal responsibility.