Value consciousness: An attempt to define
( Pp. 106-113)

The purpose of the research. The article consider value consciousness is a special sphere of human consciousness that has its own structure and characteristic features. It was discovered in the phenomenological axiology of E. Husserl, M. Scheler, N. Hartmann and D. von Hildebrand. One of the main achievements was the discovery of value intuition-a sense of comprehension of values. The purpose of this article is to systematize knowledge about value consciousness. Results. Value consciousness has its own structure: value intuition; affectivity; free will; evaluation, evaluative judgments; rationality and prejudice of value. The value prejudice plays a general idea of the value consciousness. The way to realize value consciousness is a value response. It performs cognitive and praxiological roles. The definition of value consciousness is given as a way of correlating the real and ideal worlds, through which a person enters into value relations with the world and embodies values. The boundaries between personal and group types of value consciousness are drawn: individual consciousness is more affective, values are realized only through it, it is more complex. Positive and negative experiences, especially suffering and the feeling of death, are identified as sources of value consciousness formation. The fundamental characteristic of value consciousness is its determination by both ideal and real worlds, which leads to the emergence of “disconnection”. This is alienation from objective being, good, higher values as a result of the defeat of consciousness by “value blindness”, moral indifference. They are based on the love of low things, due to the inability to know the highest values.

Kuzmenkov V.., (2020), VALUE CONSCIOUSNESS: AN ATTEMPT TO DEFINE. Sociopolitical Sciences, 6 => 106-113.

Gadamer KH.-G. Istina i metod. M.: Progress, 1988. 704 s.
Gartman N. Etika. SPb.: Vladimir Dal , 2002. 704 s.
Gil debrand D. fon. Etika. M.: Aleteyya, 2001. 570 c.
Gusserl E. Idei k chistoy fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoy filosofii. Kn. 1. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2019. 489 s.
Gusserl E. Filosofiya kak strogaya nauka: izbrannye raboty. M.: Izdat. dom Territoriya budushchego , 2005. S. 185-240.
Dostoevskiy F.M. Zapiski iz podpol ya. SPb.: Azbuka-Klassika, 2008. 256 s.
Zimmel G. Sozertsanie zhizni. CHetyre metafizicheskie glavy. M.: YUrist , 1996. S. 7-301.
Zinchenko V.P. Ot potoka k strukture soznaniya // Psikhologiya. ZHurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. 2009. T. 6. № 2. S. 3-36.
Yoas KH. Vozniknovenie tsennostey. SPb.: Aleteyya, 2013. 312 s.
Miroshnikov YU.I. TSennostnoe soznanie v svete ontologii // Epistemy: sb. nauch. statey. Vyp. 8: Problemy sovremennoy ontologii. Ekaterinburg: Azhur, 2013. S. 62-71.
Miroshnikov YU.I. TSennostnoe soznanie i ego struktura // Antinomii. 2003. Vyp. 4. S. 66-83.
Molchanov V.I. Fenomenologiya i terminologiya v Ideyakh I : chto estestvennogo v estestvennoy ustanovke // Filosofskiy zhurnal. 2018. T. 11. № 4. S. 21-35.
Sapol ski R. Biologiya dobra i zla. Kak nauka ob yasnyaet nashi postupki. M.: ANF, 2019. 766 s.
Slinin YA.A. Transtsendental nyy solipsizm // HORIZON. Fenomenologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 6. S. 116-139.
SHeler M. Resentiment v strukture moraley. SPb.: Nauka, Universitetskaya kniga, 1999. 231 s.
SHeler M. Formalizm v etike i material naya teoriya tsennostey: izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Gnozis, 1994. 490 s. S. 259-338.

affectiveness, N. Hartmann, D. von Hildebrand, conflict, “disconnection”, free will, values, value consciousness, value prejudice, M. Scheler.