ON SOME ISSUES OF CHOOSING A PREVENTIVE MEASURE IN THE FORM OF A PLEDGE
( Pp. 162-164)
More about authors
Evlanova Elena Yu.
starshiy prepodavatel kafedry ugolovno-pravovyh disciplin yuridicheskogo fakulteta
Russian Customs Academy
Russian Customs Academy
Abstract:
The article deals with the grounds and circumstances taken into account when choosing preventive measures, the issues of expediency of electing a pledge against a suspect; reveals the groundlessness of the election and application of a ban on the commission of certain actions simultaneously with the election of a pledge. The author proposes to exclude the use of a pledge against a suspect and not simultaneously select a ban on certain actions.
How to Cite:
Evlanova E.Y., (2018), ON SOME ISSUES OF CHOOSING A PREVENTIVE MEASURE IN THE FORM OF A PLEDGE. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 162-164.
Reference list:
Vershinina S.I. Zalog v sisteme mer presecheniya. Avtoreferat diss kand.yurid.nauk. Samara, 1998. S. 13.
Dubinskiy A.YA., Serbulov A.M. Mery presecheniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Kiev. 1990
Evlanova E.YU. Nedvizhimoe imushchestvo i denezhnye sredstva kak predmet zaloga v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve; nauchno-obrazovatel nyy zhurnal Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta (ISSN-2071-0313), 2017 g. S. 103-107.
Kovriga Z.F. Ukaz.soch. S. 51.
Medvedeva O.V. Zalog i poruchitel stvo v sisteme mer ugolovno-protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya po zakonodatel stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss kand. yurid. nauk M., RGB, 2002.
Mikhaylov V.A. Mery presecheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.,1993. S. 18-19.
Mikhaylov V.A. Mery presecheniya v Rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse. M., Pravo i zakon, 1996
Ozhegov S.I., SHvedova N.YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. M.: Rossiyskaya Akademiya nauk, Institut russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova, 2002. 463 s.
TSokolova O. I. Primenenie organami predvaritel nogo sledstviya i doznaniya mer protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya pod sudebnym kontrolem. Avtoreferat diss kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1995, S. 8,14.
SHeyfer S.A. Metodologicheskie i pravovye problemy sobiraniya dokazatel stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Avtoreferat diss. d.yu.n. M.,1981. S.16.
Dubinskiy A.YA., Serbulov A.M. Mery presecheniya v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Kiev. 1990
Evlanova E.YU. Nedvizhimoe imushchestvo i denezhnye sredstva kak predmet zaloga v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve; nauchno-obrazovatel nyy zhurnal Vestnik Vladimirskogo yuridicheskogo instituta (ISSN-2071-0313), 2017 g. S. 103-107.
Kovriga Z.F. Ukaz.soch. S. 51.
Medvedeva O.V. Zalog i poruchitel stvo v sisteme mer ugolovno-protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya po zakonodatel stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss kand. yurid. nauk M., RGB, 2002.
Mikhaylov V.A. Mery presecheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.,1993. S. 18-19.
Mikhaylov V.A. Mery presecheniya v Rossiyskom ugolovnom protsesse. M., Pravo i zakon, 1996
Ozhegov S.I., SHvedova N.YU. Tolkovyy slovar russkogo yazyka. M.: Rossiyskaya Akademiya nauk, Institut russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova, 2002. 463 s.
TSokolova O. I. Primenenie organami predvaritel nogo sledstviya i doznaniya mer protsessual nogo prinuzhdeniya pod sudebnym kontrolem. Avtoreferat diss kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1995, S. 8,14.
SHeyfer S.A. Metodologicheskie i pravovye problemy sobiraniya dokazatel stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse. Avtoreferat diss. d.yu.n. M.,1981. S.16.
