ABOUT THE NECESSITY OF THE EQUILIBRIUM OF CONDITIONAL-PREMATURE LIBERATION FOR PERSONS THAT HAVE COMMITTED CRIMES OF EXTREMIST DIRECTION
( Pp. 146-148)

A task: To provide a scientific justification for the need to tighten parole for persons who have committed extremist crimes. Methodology: The formal-logical, legal and statistical methods of scientific knowledge were used in the preparation of the article. Conclusions: Based on the conducted research, the author comes to the conclusion that persons who commit crimes of extremist orientation should be maximally unavoidable while serving their forced labor or imprisonment. Scope of the research / the possibility of subsequent use of the results of scientific work: It is proposed to include in item «g» part 3 of Art. 79 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, an addition that establishes the condition for providing data to persons of this exemption only after they have served at least three-quarters of the sentence scheduled by the court. Practical significance: The proposed changes to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation will increase the effectiveness of the state response to crimes of an extremist nature and reduce the commission of these criminal acts in society. Social consequences: The article is of scientific and practical interest for improving the practice of countering extremist crimes. Originality / Value: The work is intended for a wide range of readers interested in issues of countering crime, in particular, crimes of an extremist nature. Sufficiently useful information for its professional activities in it will be found by lawyers, lawyers, law enforcement officers, scientists.

Smirnov A.M., (2018), ABOUT THE NECESSITY OF THE EQUILIBRIUM OF CONDITIONAL-PREMATURE LIBERATION FOR PERSONS THAT HAVE COMMITTED CRIMES OF EXTREMIST DIRECTION. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 146-148.

O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks RSFSR, Ugolovno-ispolnitel nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i drugie zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Federal nyy zakon ot 09 marta № 25-FZ (red. ot 08.12.2003) // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 2001. № 52. 14 marta.
Avdeev YU.I., Arsen ev V.V., Naydenko V.N. Kontseptual nye i pravovye voprosy sovershenstvovaniya protivodeystviya ekstremizmu v Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Pravo. 2010. № 4. S. 70-84;
Azizova V.T. Teoretiko-pravovye osnovy profilaktiki ekstremistskoy deyatel nosti kak napravleniya protivodeystviya ekstremizmu v RF // Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: Obshchestvennye nauki. 2016. № 4. S. 69-77;
Grebenkin F.B. Mery ugolovno-pravovogo kharaktera i ikh primenenie. M.: YUrlitinform, 2013. - 263 s.;
Zubkova V.I. Ugolovnoe zakonodatel stvo evropeyskikh stran: sravnitel no-pravovoe issledovanie. M.: YUrlitinform, 2013. - 326 s.;
Pisarenko O.N. Ekstremizm kak sotsial noe yavlenie // Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnykh issledovaniy. 2010. № 9. S. 212-218;
Knigge P. The ecological correlates of right-wing extremism in western Europe // European Journal of Political Research. 1998. T. 34. № 2. Rr. 249-279;
Pain E. The social nature of extremism and terrorism // Social Sciences. 2002. T. 33. № 3. Rr. 55-68;
Powers T.F. Confronting right-wing extremism and terrorism in the USA // Perspectives on Politics. 2004. T. 2. № 3. Rr. 600-601.