EXEMPTION FROM PENAL LIABILITIES: SOCIAL AND LEGAL CONDITIONALITY, SOME PROBLEMS OF REGULATORY CONTROLS OF ACTIVE REPENTANCE
( Pp. 105-109)

The relevance of the work is determined by the fact that taking into account the nature and gravity of the offence and of the person, the principles of Justice, humanism, reasonable sufficiency of criminal repression happens to be more efficient and useful to society do not apply and release the person first commits minor offence or a moderately serious criminal responsibility. Ostupivshijsja people sometimes has an inner need to make amends for the harm caused. The embodiment of this in reality deserves indulgence, provide a basis for consideration of the question of exemption from criminal responsibility. Conclusions and suggestions. The survey results show that for 66% of respondents if they would have found themselves in the role of victims of crime, it is preferable to obtain reparation and compensation of moral harm, rather than pursue the culprit. Conclusion that the existence of the Criminal Law Institute of exemption from criminal liability is socially determined. Proposals to improve the Church. 75 of the criminal code. It is proposed to supplement its provisions, according to which establish that the motives of the effective remorse do not affect the solution to the question of exemption from criminal responsibility and compensation for material damage and mitigating other ailment can be made directly by the accused or at the request of any other person or legal entity, on a voluntary basis. Practical value. The basic provisions of work, conclusions and recommendations are important for further improvement at the legislative level, the Criminal Law Institute of exemption from criminal liability in General and its integral component-in connection with active repentance, as well as for law enforcement. They are aimed at ensuring the positive trends in the area of combating the criminalization of social relations and mitigate the socio-psychological tension in society.

Bazarov R.A., (2019), EXEMPTION FROM PENAL LIABILITIES: SOCIAL AND LEGAL CONDITIONALITY, SOME PROBLEMS OF REGULATORY CONTROLS OF ACTIVE REPENTANCE. Sociopolitical Sciences, 3 => 105-109.

Aleksandrova N.S. Deyatel noe raskayanie i ego ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Ul yanovsk, 2001. 239 s.
Endol tseva A.V. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: teoreticheskie, zakonodatel nye i pravoprimenitel nye problemy: dis. d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2005. 396 s.
Zabarchuk E.L. Deyatel noe raskayanie v ugolovnom prave: voprosy teorii i praktiki: dis. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006. 196 s.
Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchyetom popravok, vnesyennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // Elektronnyy resurs: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus .
Kumykov S.KH. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v svyazi s deyatel nym raskayaniem // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2015. № 7. S. 111-113. Meltonyan R.M. Osvobozhdenie ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: kriminologicheskaya obosnovannost zakona // YUridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel naya praktika. 2014. № 3 (29). S. 47-53.
Ponyatovskaya T.G. Nuzhny li usloviyam osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti formal nye priznaki // Obshchestvo i pravo. 2015. № 4 (54). S. 93-98.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 24.04.2003 № 7-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozheniya punkta 8 Postanovleniya Gosudarstvennoy Dumy ot 26 maya 2000 goda Ob ob yavlenii amnistii v svyazi s 55-letiem Pobedy v Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyne 1941-1945 godov v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanki L.M. Zaporozhets // Elektronnyy resurs: URL https://legalacts.ru/doc/postanovlenie-konstitutsionnogo-suda-rf-ot-24042003-n/ (data obrashcheniya: 06.05.2019).
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27 iyunya 2013 g. № 19 O primenenii sudami zakonodatel stva, reglamentiruyushchego osnovaniya i poryadok osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti (v red. ot 29.11.2016) // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2013. № 8.
Tolkovyy slovar po psikhologii. M., 2013. // Elektronnyy resurs: URL https://psychology dictionary.academic.ru/ (data obrashcheniya: 10.05.2019).
Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ (v red. ot 23.04.2019) // Elektronnyy resurs: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus .