SELFISH GOAL AS A SIGN OF THEFT IN THE CRIMINAL LAW OF RUSSIA: DISPUTABLE QUESTIONS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
( Pp. 157-161)
More about authors
Gudkov Anton P.
sledovatel po osobo vazhnym delam Sledstvennogo upravleniya Sledstvennogo komiteta Rossiyskoy Federacii po Magadanskoy oblasti
Investigative department for the Magadan region of the Investigation Committee of Russian Federation
Investigative department for the Magadan region of the Investigation Committee of Russian Federation
Abstract:
The concept of selfish goal as an obligatory sign of theft in the legislation is not contained and in the guiding explanations of the highest court is not properly disclosed, which leads to problems in law enforcement. In the science of criminal law there are conflicting positions regarding the feature in question and the proposal to exclude it from the legislative definition of theft. This study is devoted to the development of a proper understanding of the selfish goal and a proposal on the need to indicate this feature in the legislative definition of theft. The sign of the goal, as a subjective sign of the composition of theft, is considered in historical development according to the domestic criminal legislation of the pre-revolutionary, Soviet and modern periods. The explanations of the highest court regarding the content of self-interest in relation to various types and forms of theft and other crimes are analyzed. The scientific works of theoreticians of criminal law of various historical periods are considered, which understand the selfish goal in a broad and narrow sense. The decisions of courts of various instances and the reasons for the cancellation of sentences by higher courts in criminal cases on theft are analyzed. In domestic criminal legislation of various historical periods, theft was characterized by an obligatory sign of the subjective side - the goal, now defined as selfish. Misunderstanding of the selfish goal of theft leads to mistakes in law enforcement practice. A sign of a selfish goal allows you to delimit theft from other crimes, so it is necessary to characterize theft. In Russia's criminal law, the selfish goal in theft is understood in a broad sense and can be defined as the desire of the guilty party to own, use or dispose of the stolen thing at his discretion.
How to Cite:
Gudkov A.P., (2017), SELFISH GOAL AS A SIGN OF THEFT IN THE CRIMINAL LAW OF RUSSIA: DISPUTABLE QUESTIONS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 5 => 157-161.
Reference list:
O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks RSFSR i Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks RSFSR: Federal nyy zakon ot 1 iyulya 1994 g. № 10-FZ / Rossiyskaya Federatsiya // Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus . Razdel Zakonodatel stvo . Informatsionnyy bank Versiya Prof .
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 dekabrya 2007 g. № 51 / Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus . Razdel Sudebnaya praktika . Informatsionnyy bank Versiya Prof .
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 dekabrya 2002 g. № 29 / Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus . Razdel Sudebnaya praktika . Informatsionnyy bank Versiya Prof .
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o zloupotreblenii dolzhnostnymi polnomochiyami i o prevyshenii dolzhnostnykh polnomochiy: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 16 oktyabrya 2009 g. № 16 / Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus . Razdel Sudebnaya praktika . Informatsionnyy bank Versiya Prof .
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 2002 g. № 5 / Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus . Razdel Sudebnaya praktika . Informatsionnyy bank Versiya Prof .
Ugolovnoe ulozhenie, vysochayshe utverzhdennoe 22 marta 1903 g. SPb.: Izdanie senatskoy tipografii, 1903. - 144 s.
Delo № 1-22/2016 // Arkhiv Zavodskogo rayonnogo suda g. Novokuznetska.
Delo № 30-007-18 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii.
Delo № 1-441/2015 // Arkhiv Kamyshinskogo gorodskogo suda Volgogradskoy oblasti.
Delo № 22-5683 // Arkhiv Permskogo kraevogo suda.
Akhmedov, R.U. Otsenochnye priznaki khishcheniya i ego form v ugolovnom prave: avtoreferat dis. kand. yurid. nauk / R.U. Akhmedov. - Krasnodar, 2013. - 27 s.
Bezverkhov, A.G. Imushchestvennye prestupleniya / A.G. Bezverkhov. - Samara: Samarskiy universitet, 2002. - 359 s.
Bogdanchikov, S.V. Protivodeystvie prestupnym posyagatel stvam na absolyutnye prava sobstvennosti (khishcheniya) / S.V. Bogdanchikov. - M.: YUNITI-DANA, 2008. - 160 s.
Boytsov, A.I. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti / A.I. Boytsov. - Spb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2002. - 775 s.
Bratanov, V.V. Ponyatie khishcheniya // Biznes v zakone. - 2007. - № 2. - S. 82-88.
Vladimirov, V.A., Lyapunov, YU.I. Otvetstvennost za korystnye posyagatel stva na sotsialisticheskuyu sobstvennost / V.A. Vladimirov, YU.I. Lyapunov. - M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1986. - 224 s.
Geyn, A.K. Korystnaya tsel kak kriminoobrazuyushchiy priznak prestupleniy v Ugolovnom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // YUridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel naya praktika. - 2010. - № 1/11. - S. 46-54.
Dal , V.I. Tolkovyy slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka / V.I. Dal : v 4t. - t. 2: I - O. - M.: RIPOL klassik, 2006. - 784 s.
Dokshokov, A.Z. Koryst v soderzhanii tseli i motiva prestupnogo posyagatel stva protiv sobstvennosti v vide prisvoeniya i rastraty // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. - 2007. - № 1. - S. 86-88.
ZHizhilenko, A.A. Prestupleniya protiv imushchestva i isklyuchitel nykh prav / A.A. ZHizhilenko. - Leningrad: Izdatel stvo Rabochiy sud , 1928. - 207 s.
Lopashenko, N.A. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomiki. Avtorskiy kommentariy k ugolovnomu zakonu / N.A. Lopashenko. - M.: Volters Kluver, 2007. - 538 s.
Milyukov, S.F. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe zakonodatel stvo: opyt kriticheskogo analiza / S.F. Milyukov. - Spb: IVESEP, Znanie, 2000. - 279 s.
Sklyarov, S.V. Ponyatie khishcheniya v ugolovnom zakonodatel stve Rossii: teoreticheskiy analiz // Gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1997. - № 9. - S. 64-68.
Tenchov, V.S. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti / V.S. Tenchov. - Ivanovo: Ivanovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 1980. - 86 s.
Foynitskiy, I.YA. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. CHast osobennaya. Posyagatel stva lichnye i imushchestvennye / I.YA. Foynitskiy. - 4-e izd. - SPb.: Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1901. - 433s.
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 dekabrya 2007 g. № 51 / Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus . Razdel Sudebnaya praktika . Informatsionnyy bank Versiya Prof .
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 27 dekabrya 2002 g. № 29 / Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus . Razdel Sudebnaya praktika . Informatsionnyy bank Versiya Prof .
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o zloupotreblenii dolzhnostnymi polnomochiyami i o prevyshenii dolzhnostnykh polnomochiy: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 16 oktyabrya 2009 g. № 16 / Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus . Razdel Sudebnaya praktika . Informatsionnyy bank Versiya Prof .
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 12 marta 2002 g. № 5 / Plenum Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Spravochnaya pravovaya sistema Konsul tant Plyus . Razdel Sudebnaya praktika . Informatsionnyy bank Versiya Prof .
Ugolovnoe ulozhenie, vysochayshe utverzhdennoe 22 marta 1903 g. SPb.: Izdanie senatskoy tipografii, 1903. - 144 s.
Delo № 1-22/2016 // Arkhiv Zavodskogo rayonnogo suda g. Novokuznetska.
Delo № 30-007-18 // Arkhiv Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii.
Delo № 1-441/2015 // Arkhiv Kamyshinskogo gorodskogo suda Volgogradskoy oblasti.
Delo № 22-5683 // Arkhiv Permskogo kraevogo suda.
Akhmedov, R.U. Otsenochnye priznaki khishcheniya i ego form v ugolovnom prave: avtoreferat dis. kand. yurid. nauk / R.U. Akhmedov. - Krasnodar, 2013. - 27 s.
Bezverkhov, A.G. Imushchestvennye prestupleniya / A.G. Bezverkhov. - Samara: Samarskiy universitet, 2002. - 359 s.
Bogdanchikov, S.V. Protivodeystvie prestupnym posyagatel stvam na absolyutnye prava sobstvennosti (khishcheniya) / S.V. Bogdanchikov. - M.: YUNITI-DANA, 2008. - 160 s.
Boytsov, A.I. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti / A.I. Boytsov. - Spb.: Izdatel stvo YUridicheskiy tsentr Press , 2002. - 775 s.
Bratanov, V.V. Ponyatie khishcheniya // Biznes v zakone. - 2007. - № 2. - S. 82-88.
Vladimirov, V.A., Lyapunov, YU.I. Otvetstvennost za korystnye posyagatel stva na sotsialisticheskuyu sobstvennost / V.A. Vladimirov, YU.I. Lyapunov. - M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1986. - 224 s.
Geyn, A.K. Korystnaya tsel kak kriminoobrazuyushchiy priznak prestupleniy v Ugolovnom kodekse Rossiyskoy Federatsii // YUridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel naya praktika. - 2010. - № 1/11. - S. 46-54.
Dal , V.I. Tolkovyy slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka / V.I. Dal : v 4t. - t. 2: I - O. - M.: RIPOL klassik, 2006. - 784 s.
Dokshokov, A.Z. Koryst v soderzhanii tseli i motiva prestupnogo posyagatel stva protiv sobstvennosti v vide prisvoeniya i rastraty // Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. - 2007. - № 1. - S. 86-88.
ZHizhilenko, A.A. Prestupleniya protiv imushchestva i isklyuchitel nykh prav / A.A. ZHizhilenko. - Leningrad: Izdatel stvo Rabochiy sud , 1928. - 207 s.
Lopashenko, N.A. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomiki. Avtorskiy kommentariy k ugolovnomu zakonu / N.A. Lopashenko. - M.: Volters Kluver, 2007. - 538 s.
Milyukov, S.F. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe zakonodatel stvo: opyt kriticheskogo analiza / S.F. Milyukov. - Spb: IVESEP, Znanie, 2000. - 279 s.
Sklyarov, S.V. Ponyatie khishcheniya v ugolovnom zakonodatel stve Rossii: teoreticheskiy analiz // Gosudarstvo i pravo. - 1997. - № 9. - S. 64-68.
Tenchov, V.S. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana sotsialisticheskoy sobstvennosti / V.S. Tenchov. - Ivanovo: Ivanovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet, 1980. - 86 s.
Foynitskiy, I.YA. Kurs ugolovnogo prava. CHast osobennaya. Posyagatel stva lichnye i imushchestvennye / I.YA. Foynitskiy. - 4-e izd. - SPb.: Tipografiya M.M. Stasyulevicha, 1901. - 433s.
Keywords:
theft, selfish purpose, the powers of the owner of the property, enrichment, the property benefits.
