INDEMNIFICATION FOR DAMAGES WHEN CONTRACTING TERMINATION
( Pp. 184-187)

More about authors
Paraskevova Svetlana A. doktor yuridicheskih nauk, professor. Dolzhnost: sudya
the Sixteenth Arbitration Court of Appeal, Yessentuki, Stavropol Territory
Abstract:
The article explores the issue of compensation for losses upon termination of the contract as a result of its violation by one of the parties. On the basis of a critical analysis of the novelties of the civil legislation on concrete and abstract methods of calculating losses, the author expresses doubts that in the conditions of modern legislation and established judicial practice, the compensation of concrete or abstract losses caused by violation of contractual obligations will become widespread.
How to Cite:
Paraskevova S.A., (2017), INDEMNIFICATION FOR DAMAGES WHEN CONTRACTING TERMINATION. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 2 => 184-187.
Reference list:
Degtyarev S. L. Vozmeshchenie ubytkov v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse. M., 2001. S. 8;
Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti pervoy (postateynyy) / otv. red. O. N. Sadikov. M., 2005. S. 74;
Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: v 2 t. T. 1. / pod red. T. E. Abovoy, A. YU. Kabalkina. M., 2010. S. 38.
Kontseptsiya razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva // Vestnik VAS RF. 2009. № 11. S. 73.
Kontseptsiya razvitiya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva. S. 73-74;
Vitryanskiy V. V. Proektiruemye novye obshchie polozheniya ob obyazatel stvakh v usloviyakh reformirovaniya grazhdanskogo zakonodatel stva // Aktual nye problemy chastnogo prava: sb. statey / otv. red. B. M. Gongalo, V. Em. M., 2014. S. 55-56.
Vitryanskiy V. V. Osobennosti otvetstvennosti za narushenie predprinimatel skogo dogovora // ZHurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2008. № 1. S. 25;
Braginskiy M. I., Vitryanskiy V. V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga pervaya: Obshchie polozheniya. M., 2005. S. 655-656.
Kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti pervoy (postateynyy). S. 1018.
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda TSentral nogo okruga ot 18.02.2005 po delu № A35-351/03-S9;
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 26.08.2011 po delu № A65-28882/2010;
Postanovlenie Dvadtsatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 11.04.2016 po delu № A23-5711/2015.
Postanovlenie SHestogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 27.07.2015 po delu № A37-2218/2014.
O nekotorykh voprosakh razresheniya sporov, voznikayushchikh iz dogovorov po povodu nedvizhimosti, kotoraya budet sozdana ili priobretena v budushchem: Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 11.07.2011 № 54 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2011. № 9.
O rassmotrenii sudami grazhdanskikh del po sporam o zashchite prav potrebiteley: Postanovlenie Plenuma VS RF ot 28.06.2012 № 17 // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2012. № 9.
O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii ob otvetstvennosti za narushenie obyazatel stv: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 24.03.2016 № 7 // Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2016. № 5.
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Ural skogo okruga ot 20.08.2007 po delu № A60-30796/06;
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 05.10.2009 po delu № A53-27338/2008.
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 10.04.2013 po delu № A45-21062/2012;
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 16.06.2010 po delu № A65-24515/2009.
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 22.07.2013 po delu № A40-96176/12-77-957;
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 20.03.2012 po delu № A03-1104/2011.
Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS RF ot 21.01.2014 № 13517/13 po delu № A40-116623/2012 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2014. № 5.
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Zapadno-Sibirskogo okruga ot 11.03.2014 po delu № A27-5252/2013;
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 19.03.2010 po delu № A53-7145/2009.
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 07.05.2014 po delu № A56-32153/2013;
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 17.07.2007 po delu № A63-8060/2006-S1.
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 26.02.2009 po delu № A40-33189/08-52-339.
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 26.03.2013 № VAS-2886/13 po delu № A32-23104/2011;
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 30.11.2010 № VAS-15565/10 po delu № A56-22262/2009;
Opredelenie VAS RF ot 19.02.2008 № 2397/08 po delu № A03-3957/07-6;
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Povolzhskogo okruga ot 24.12.2012 po delu № A12-8059/2012;
Postanovlenie Federal nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga ot 12.02.2010 po delu № A40-28594/09-55-279.
Keywords:
recover damages, calculation of damages, breach of contract, reform of the law of obligations.


Related Articles

3. CIVIL LAW; ENTREPRENEURIAL LAW; FAMILY LAW; INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW Pages: 56-60 Issue №12615
Liability for Breach of Contract in Russian and foreign law
breach of contract responsibility Russian law international law the main trends
Show more
6. LEGAL SUPPORT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITIES Pages: 137-139 Issue №3231
To a question of legal problems of responsibility under the crediting contract
breach of contract responsibility the application of measures to debtors contracts violation of the interests
Show more