THE DEVELOPMENT OF RISK THEORY AND THE CATEGORY OF «LEGAL LIABILITY» IN CIVIL, BUSINESS, INSURANCE LAW: THE CURRENT STATE OF THE PROBLEM
( Pp. 40-47)

The purpose of writing the work is an attempt to substantiate and offer theoretical answers to the emerging new social phenomena (the development of computer tools that can be used in business relations). This direction is explored by foreign authors: Beck T., Demirguc-Kunt A., Levine R., Jiang L., Stocco A., Losey D. M., Abernethy J. A., Prat C. S., Rao R. P. N., Filevich E., Kühn S., Haggard P., Calo R., Froomkin M., Kerr I. To successfully cover possible problems, the author used general scientific research methods: content analysis, extrapolation, systematization and generalization of methods, assessment of trends in retrospective and prospective plans. Special legal methods were also used: formal legal method, methods of interpretation of law (grammatical, systematic, functional, logical), legal modeling, legal forecast. These methodologies allowed conducting an interdisciplinary study and formulating conclusions with a focus on solving problems of legal science. Findings. The author has formulated proposals for improving the theoretical doctrine in the field of civil, business, insurance law. The results can influence the increase in the effectiveness of the application of standards, reduce costs in the implementation of economic transactions. The results obtained can be used in the lawmaking process in reforming civil, business and insurance legislation. It is also possible to use the results in the conduct of contractual work in the course of business activities by economic entities. The application of the formulated proposals will reduce risks in the implementation of entrepreneurship, reduce the number of challenging transactions based on the presence of various blemishes in legal relations, create a mechanism to guarantee compensation for losses in business activities, transfer application of measures of responsibility from entrepreneurs to specially created organizations or funds. The society and the state can benefit from the transfer of legal entities under the jurisdiction of Russia in connection with effective legislation, law enforcement in the form of additional contributions to the budgets of various funds. The work is intended for specialists in civil, business, insurance law, as well as groups of specialists who carry out legislative activities in the field of legal regulation of economic activity.

Abramov S.G., (2018), THE DEVELOPMENT OF RISK THEORY AND THE CATEGORY OF «LEGAL LIABILITY» IN CIVIL, BUSINESS, INSURANCE LAW: THE CURRENT STATE OF THE PROBLEM. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 6 => 40-47.

Hameroff S. R., Penrose R. Conscious events as orchestrated spacetime selections // Journal of Consciousness Studies. 1996. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 36-53.
Jiang L., Stocco A., Losey D. M., Abernethy J. A., Prat C. S., Rao R. P. N. BrainNet: A Multi-Person Brain-to-Brain Interface for Direct Collaboration Between Brains // Cornell University Library. 2018. URL: http://www. arxiv.org/abs/1809.08632 (data obrashcheniya: 20.11.2018).
Libet B., Gleason C. A., Wright E. W., Pearl D. K. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act // Brain. 1983. Vol. 106. Issue 3. P. 623-642.
Abramov S. G. Ontologicheskie osnovaniya sotsial nykh norm i ekonomicheskogo bazisa pri osushchestvlenii strategicheskogo gosudarstvennogo upravleniya (teoreticheskie gipotezy razvitiya sotsial nykh sistem) // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2018. № 1. S. 333-336.
Abramov S. G. Ontologicheskie osnovaniya sotsial nykh norm i ekonomicheskogo bazisa pri osushchestvlenii strategicheskogo gosudarstvennogo upravleniya (algoritmy meropriyatiy po konstruirovaniyu budushchego sotsial no-ekonomicheskogo i pravovogo prostranstva) // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2018. № 2. S. 293-296.
Aryamov A. A. Obshchaya teoriya riska: yuridicheskiy, ekonomicheskiy i psikhologicheskiy analiz. - M. : RAP : Volters Kluver, 2010. - 202 s.
Bratus S. N. Spornye voprosy teorii yuridicheskoy otvetstvennosti // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1973. № 4. S. 27-35.
Dubrovskiy D. I. Kriticheskiy analiz teorii soznaniya Penrouza-KHameroffa. CH. 1 // Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. 2017. № 1. T. 22. S. 125-136.
Kopylov V. A. Risk v predprinimatel skoy deyatel nosti : avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. - Volgograd, 2003. - 23 s.
Krasavchikov O. A. YUridicheskie fakty v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave / Kategorii nauki grazhdanskogo prava. Izbrannye trudy. V 2 t. T. 2. - M. : Statut, 2005. - 494 s.
Magaziner YA. M. Obshchaya teoriya prava na osnove sovetskogo zakonodatel stva // Pravovedenie. 1999. № 1. S. 128-138.
Oygenzikht V. A. Volya i voleiz yavlenie (Ocherki teorii, filosofii i psikhologii prava) / otv. red. S.A. Radzhabov. - Dushanbe : Donish, 1983. - 256 s.
Oygenzikht V. A. Problema riska v grazhdanskom prave. - Dushanbe : IRFON, 1972. - 225 s.
Povaryenkov A. YU. Risk v trudovom prave i prave sotsial nogo obespecheniya : dis. kand. yurid. nauk. - YAroslavl , 2010. - 225 s.
Spiridonov V. Reshenie zadach: kto i chto reshaet // Nauka i zhizn . 2012. № 10. S. 44-45.