COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES IN PRACTICE OF COLLECTION OF AN INCOME TAX FROM THE SUMS OF A PENALTY AND PENALTY FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONSUMER BY THE PERFORMER OF A VOLUNTARY ORDER COLLECTED BY COURT
( Pp. 200-205)

More about authors
Zhdanov Sergey P. Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Corresponding Member of the Academy of Military Sciences; Associate Professor of Civil Law Disciplines Department; Associate Professor of Customs Law and Customs Affairs Organization Department; Associate Professor of Constitutional and Municipal Law Department
Russian Economics University named after G.V. Plekhanov; Russian university of transport; Moscow State Regional University
Moscow, Russian Federation Hovrachev Roman N. starshiy prepodavatel 108 kafedry (kafedra socialno-ekonomicheskih disciplin)
the Military Space Academy named after A.F. Mozhaisky Skryachev Alexander M. Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor, Senior Lecturer
Military Space Academy named after A.F. Mozhaisky
Saint Petersburgh, Russian Federation
Abstract:
In the present article questions of violation of legitimate rights and the interests of citizens-consumers in the sphere of taxation owing to imperfection of law-enforcement acts are considered. Concluded that the position of tax authorities in this sphere has changed repeatedly, not only from the position of the position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, which, in turn, found its expression in his definitions and reviews of jurisprudence. In this context, addressed the issue of the legal status of such an as the Supreme Court, which be approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Court and its relationship with the acts adopted by the plenum of the Supreme Court. The analysis of several acts of the Federal tax service, containing explanations of tax legislation in this area of research. The feature of these acts is that they, although formally and are not legal acts, but actually possess normative properties. In this regard at application it is necessary to by guided Resolution of Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of March 31, 2015 № 6-P. Despite it, unfortunately, judicial practice and practice fiscal bodies in this sphere is rather contradictory. The conclusion is drawn on need of activization of process of acceptance of changes and additions in legal procedure according to the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of October 3, 2017 № 30 «About entering into the State Duma of Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of the draft federal law «About introduction of amendments in the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the Arbitrage code of practice of the Russian Federation, the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation and separate acts of the Russian Federation».
How to Cite:
Zhdanov S.P., Hovrachev R.N., Skryachev A.M., (2019), COGNITIVE DISSONANCE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES IN PRACTICE OF COLLECTION OF AN INCOME TAX FROM THE SUMS OF A PENALTY AND PENALTY FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONSUMER BY THE PERFORMER OF A VOLUNTARY ORDER COLLECTED BY COURT. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 2 => 200-205.
Reference list:
Pis mo Ministerstva finansov RF ot 7 sentyabrya 2015 g. № 03-04-07/51476 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31 marta 2015 goda № 6-P // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Postanovleniya Plenumov Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 28.06.2012 g. № 17 i ot 29.01.2015 g. № 2 // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sudami del, svyazannykh s primeneniem glavy 23 Nalogovogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Utv. Prezidiumom Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii 21 oktyabrya 2015 g. // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Delo po isku Skryacheva D.A. k MIFNS № 10 (arkhiv Leninskogo rayonnogo suda goroda Vladimira. Delo № 2-10449/2015) // Lichnyy arkhiv.
Opredelenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 4 dekabrya 2003 g. № 441-O i 442-O // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Opredelenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 4 iyunya 2007 g. № 320-O-P // SPS Konsul tantPlyus .
Rarog A.I. Pravovoe znachenie raz yasneniy Verkhovnogo Suda RF // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2001. № 2. S. 51.
Savchenko V.V. Pravovaya priroda normativnogo pravovogo akta kak istochnika prava// Biznes v zakone. 2010. № 1. S. 51.
Petrushev V.A. Obladayut li raz yasneniya VS RF po voprosam sudebnoy praktiki obyazatel noy siloy // URL: http://wiselawyer.ru/ sudebnoj-praktiki (data obrashcheniya 05.12.2018).
Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 3 oktyabrya 2017 g. № 30 O vnesenii v Gosudarstvennuyu Dumu Federal nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii proekta Federal nogo zakona O vnesenii izmeneniy v GPK RF, APK RF, KoAP RF i otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // URL: http://legalacts.ru/ postanovlenie ot 30 (data obrashcheniya 05.12.2018).
Obzor sudebnoy praktiki // URL: http://zakon.ru/Blogs /o i obzora sudebnoj (data obrashcheniya 05.12.2018).
URL: http://ru.wiktionary.org (data obrashcheniya 06.12.2018).
CHudinov A.N. Slovar inostrannykh slov, voshedshikh v sostav russkogo yazyka. 1910 //URL:http://dic.academic.ru/dic (data obrashcheniya 06.12.2018).
Fasmer M. Etimologicheskiy slovar russkogo yazyka. M.: Progress,1986.S. 334.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar russkogo yazyka. M.: Izd-vo: Russkiy yazyk, 1984. S. 248.
URL: http://zakon.ru/comment/472645 (data obrashcheniya 05.12.2018).
URL: http://gpkodeks rf.ru (data obrashcheniya 07.12.2018).