Bribery as a legal category and its features in the sphere of state and municipal procurement abstract
(285-289)

For read the full article, please, register or log in
Annotation:
Purpose of the study. The purpose of this work is to comprehensively analyze bribery as a criminal law concept, identify criteria for its classification to improve the current criminal legislation, law enforcement and judicial practice. Findings. The emergence and development of the institution of corruption bribery in the domestic retrospective is considered. The system of classification of types of bribery in criminal law has been improved, taking into account the development of its corruption component. The author's definition of the concept of bribery as a complex concept is proposed, which characterizes the way of committing criminal offenses and individual criminal offenses, the responsibility for which is provided for by separate articles of the Special Part of the Criminal Code. A distinction is made between corruption and common criminal bribery, with the definition of the main criteria, the main of which is defined as their subject and subject. These types of bribery, in turn, can also be classified according to various criteria: so corruption bribery, including bribery in the field of state and municipal procurement, can be classified depending on the nature of the actions of its subject and addressee into forced and voluntary, passive and active. The level of specialization of a subject in relation to bribery in the field of state and municipal procurement is illustrated on the basis of the list of subjects subject to provocation of bribery in the field of state and municipal procurement. The criminal law structure of provoking bribery and bribery in the field of state and municipal purchases has been systematized.
How to Cite:
Morozov R.A., (2021), BRIBERY AS A LEGAL CATEGORY AND ITS FEATURES IN THE SPHERE OF STATE AND MUNICIPAL PROCUREMENT ABSTRACT. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 2: 285-289.
Reference list:
Abishev B. SH.K voprosu o vozmozhnosti rassmotreniya nematerial nykh blag v kachestve predmeta korruptsionnykh prestupleniy v ugolovnom kodekse Respubliki Kazakhstan // Vestnik Tadzhikskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta prava, biznesa i politiki. Seriya obshchestvennykh nauk. 2018. № 2.S. 112-118.
Agil din V. V. KHarakteristika sostava kommercheskogo podkupa // Sibirskiyyuridicheskiy vestnik. 2014. № 1 (64). S. 44-49.
Botareva E. A. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za prestupleniya, sovershaemye v sfere gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal nykh zakazov // Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2019. № 6. t. 1. S. 173-176.
Vasenin V.A. Protivodeystvie podkupam uchastnikov zakupok tovarov, rabot i uslug dlya gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal nykh nuzhd // Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. 2018. № 2. S. 187-197.
Golubykh N. V., LepikhinM. O. Sovershenstvovanie ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva v oblasti bor by s korruptsiey // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2019. № 2 (99). S. 102-109.
Ermolovich YA.N. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za nenadlezhashchee ispolnenie gosudarstvennogo oboronnogo zakaza i narushenie poryadka osushchestvleniya gosudarstvennykh zakupok // Oboronno-promyshlennyy kompleks. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.opklex.com/publikaczii/temyi/gosudarstvennyie-zakupki/ugolovnaya-otvetstvennost-za-nenadlezhashhee-ispolnenie-gosudarstvennogo-oboronnogo-zakaza-i-narushenie-poryadka-osushhestvleniya-gosudarstvennyix-zakupok.html.
Isaicheva M. M. Prestupleniya v sfere gosudarstvennykh zakupok, sovershaemye dolzhnostnymi litsami.Sposoby soversheniya i problemy kvalifikatsii // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry. 2019. № 3. S. 155-168.
Kazantsev D.A. Osobennosti predvaritel nogo rassledovaniya i sudebnogo razbiratel stva po delam o kommercheskom podkupe: Dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Tomsk, 2010.- 209 s.
Komar V. V. Ponyatie i vidy podkupa po ugolovnomu zakonodatel stvu Ukrainy: avtoref. dis. kad. yurid. nauk: 12.00.08. Odessa, 2020. 23 s.
Lepekhin M. O.Posrednichestvo vo vzyatochnichestve v svete dopolneniy, vnesennykh v ugolovnyy kodeks RF // Aktual nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2017. № 4. S. 110-115.
Mikhaylov V. I. Kommercheskiy podkup i vzyatochnichestvo: napravleniya razvitiya zakonodatel stva // Lex Russica. 2017. № 6 (127). S. 85-100.
Omigov V. I., YAkovlev D. V.Kommercheskiy podkup: ugolovno-pravovaya i kriminologicheskaya kharakteristiki // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. YUridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. № 2. S. 195-199.
Prokhorov E. A. K probleme opredeleniya predmeta prestupleniya soglasno st. 200.4 Ugolovnogo kodeksa RF // Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel stve. 2018. № 6. S.233-235.
Ragozina I. I.Kommercheskiy podkup: voprosy differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i problemy kvalifikatsii // Sibirskoe yuridicheskoe obozrenie. 2019. t. 16. № 3. C.327-332.
Rykov A.A. Kommercheskiy podkup: ponyatie, soderzhanie i nekotorye problemy rassledovaniya // YUrist - Pravoved . 2010. № 6. S. 32-34.
Sinchurin O. V. Ponyatie korruptsionnykh prestupleniy v sfere zakupok i ikh klassifikatsiya // Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba i kadry. 2019. № 1. S. 125-129.
Sulaymanova N.N., Abishev B.SH. Otvetstvennost za kommercheskiy podkup po ugolovnomu kodeksu Respubliki Kazakhstan // Uchenye zapiski KHudzhandskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. akademika B. Gafurova. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2016.- № 4. S.56-59.
Tishchenko E. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za prestupleniya v sfere gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal nykh zakupok: sravnitel no-pravovoy analiz // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2016. t. 6. № 11A. S. 93-107.
Ugolovnaya konventsiya o bor be s korruptsiey, 27.01.1999 g.
Ugolovnyy kodeks RF ot 13.06.1996 N 63-FZ.
Elekina C.B. O predmete kommercheskogo podkupa // YUridicheskiy vestnik Samarskogo universiteta. 2016. t. 2. № 4. S. 125-131.
Keywords:
corruption, bribery, provocation of bribery, corruption bribery, state and municipal procurement.