PROBLEMS OF APPEAL AGAINST THE DECISION TO REFUSE TO INITIATE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS FOR CRIMES IN THE FIELD OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY
( Pp. 177-181)

Objective: the Appeal against the decision to refuse to initiate criminal proceedings for crimes in the field of economic activity is accompanied by the presence of relevant problems that may affect the adoption of legitimate and informed decisions on the basis of consideration of such complaints. The most important of all the existing problems in this area is the imperfection of the norms of the current criminal procedure legislation. At the same time, legal scholars from foreign countries, for example, S. V. Gureev, S. V. Buiko, pay attention to a similar problem. The purpose of the scientific article is to study the problems of appealing against decisions on refusal to initiate criminal proceedings for crimes in the field of economic activity and to develop proposals for their resolution. Methodology: the Methodological basis of the study is the dialectical method of cognition, in which private scientific methods were used: system-structural, formally logical, logical-semantic, comparative law. Conclusions. According to the results of the research the following conclusion was formulated: the refusal to initiate criminal proceedings for crimes in the sphere of economic activity, in its essence, prevents victims from timely access to protection of their rights violated as a result of these criminal acts. Moreover, with such a refusal, the victim is deprived of the opportunity to achieve in law enforcement agencies the restoration of their rights violated by the crime. In this regard, the state authorities should give victims the opportunity to participate in the investigation of criminal acts in the field of economic activity, and send appropriate complaints about the violation of their rights to the Prosecutor, the head of the investigative body or the judiciary. Possibility of subsequent use: the results obtained in the course of the study can be used by the legislative authorities in their work to improve the provisions of the code of criminal procedure governing the refusal to initiate criminal proceedings, law enforcement practice of the investigation, inquiry and court, research, as well as in educational institutions in the preparation of students in legal areas. The practical significance of the results obtained in the course of the study of this problem lies in the fact that they can be used in law enforcement activities of the investigation, inquiry and court. The social significance of the results obtained is the possibility of increasing the legal protection of the rights of victims in the process of judicial proceedings when considering a complaint against a decision to refuse to initiate criminal proceedings for crimes in the sphere of economic activity. The value of the obtained results lies in the possibility of formation of law enforcement practice of investigation, inquiry and court, excluding violation of the rights of victims. This scientific work is intended for researchers and practitioners, students of educational institutions studying in the direction of «Jurisprudence».

Kanatov E.S., (2019), PROBLEMS OF APPEAL AGAINST THE DECISION TO REFUSE TO INITIATE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS FOR CRIMES IN THE FIELD OF ECONOMIC ACTIVITY. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4 => 177-181.

Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii (prinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12.12.1993) (s uchetom popravok, vnesennykh Zakonami RF o popravkakh k Konstitutsii RF ot 30.12.2008 № 6-FKZ, ot 30.12.2008 № 7-FKZ, ot 05.02.2014 № 2-FKZ, ot 21.07.2014 № 11-FKZ) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. - 2014. - №31. - St. 4398.
Federal nyy konstitutsionnyy zakon ot 21.07.1994 № 1-FKZ (red. ot 29.07.2018) O Konstitutsionnom Sude Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. - 1994. - № 13. - St. 1447.
Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 01.04.2019) // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. - 2001. - № 52 (ch. I). - St. 4921.
Federal nyy zakon ot 08.12.2003 № 161-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016) O privedenii Ugolovno-protsessual nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i drugikh zakonodatel nykh aktov v sootvetstvie s Federal nym zakonom O vnesenii izmeneniy i dopolneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. - 2003. - № 50. - St. 4847.
Federal nyy zakon ot 24.07.2007 № 214-FZ (red. ot 03.07.2016) O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s prinyatiem Federal nogo zakona O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii i Federal nyy zakon O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. - 2007. - № 31. - St. 4011.
Federal nyy zakon ot 02.12.2008 № 226-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. - 2008. - № 49. - St. 5724.
Federal nyy zakon ot 30.12.2015 № 440-FZ O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovno-protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii v chasti utochneniya polnomochiy nachal nika organa doznaniya i doznavatelya // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. - 2016. - № 1 (chast I). - St. 60.
Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 29.08.2014 № 736 (red. ot 07.11.2018) Ob utverzhdenii Instruktsii o poryadke priema, registratsii i razresheniya v territorial nykh organakh Ministerstva vnutrennikh del Rossiyskoy Federatsii zayavleniy i soobshcheniy o prestupleniyakh, ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniyakh, o proisshestviyakh // Rossiyskaya gazeta. - № 260. - 14.11.2014.
Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 18.02.2000 № 3-P Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti punkta 2 stat i 5 Federal nogo zakona O prokurature Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s zhaloboy grazhdanina B.A. Kekhmana // Sobranie zakonodatel stva RF. - 2000. - № 9. - St. 1066.
Antonov I., Vasil ev G. Obzhalovanie v sud protsessual nykh deystviy i resheniy kak garantiya zashchity lichnosti v sfere ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // YUridicheskiy mir. - 2005. - № 10. - S.48-50. Glukhov A.S. Obzhalovanie v sud v poryadke, predusmotrennom st. 125 UPK RF, resheniy, deystviy (bezdeystviya) doznavateley i organov doznaniya FSSP Rossii // Praktika ispolnitel nogo proizvodstva. - 2017. - № 1. - S.43 - 51.
Zillaliev D.T. Otkaz v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela kak faktor, blokiruyushchiy dostup poterpevshim k pravosudiyu // Rossiyskiy sledovatel . - 1999. - № 1. - S. 29-34.
Poltora milliona ugolovnykh del zakryli iz-za politseyskoy volokity - Rezhim dostupa: https://www.rbc.ru/politics/14/11/2016/ 5825e53-89a794749df138dce, svobodnyy. Data obrashcheniya: 21.06.2019 g.
CHerepanov D. YU. Deystvuyushchaya redaktsiya stat i 125 UPK RF nuzhdaetsya v utochnenii // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. - 2010. - № 6. - S. 46-48.
SHarov D.V. Zashchita prav i zakonnykh interesov zayavitelya pri prinyatii resheniya ob otkaze v vozbuzhdenii ugolovnogo dela // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2013. - № 2. - S.34-38.