AGGRAVATING AND ESPECIALLY AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES OF EXTORTION: PROBLEMS OF PROOF
( Pp. 198-200)
More about authors
Shogenov Anzor M.
prepodavatel kafedry OP
North-Caucasian Advanced Training Institute (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
North-Caucasian Advanced Training Institute (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Abstract:
In the present article the author reveals the problematic issues that exist in the process of proving extortion in the presence of qualifying features associated with the peculiarities of the legislative design of aggravating and particularly aggravating circumstances of extortion. The article describes possible ways to solve this problem associated with the design feature of qualifying signs of extortion. The author offers the evaluation criteria necessary for error-free qualification of actions of accomplices in extortion.
How to Cite:
Shogenov A.M., (2019), AGGRAVATING AND ESPECIALLY AGGRAVATING CIRCUMSTANCES OF EXTORTION: PROBLEMS OF PROOF. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 1 => 198-200.
Reference list:
Abdulgaziev, R.Z. Vymogatel stvo po rossiyskomu ugolovnomu pravu: diss.. kand. yurid. nauk /R.Z. Abdulgaziev. - Makhachkala, 2003. -174s.
Bessonov, A.A. Organizovannaya gruppa kak sub ekt ugolovno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti /A.A. Bessonov // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2008. № 6. S. 11.
Katkova, E.YU. Problemnye voprosy, voznikayushchie pri rassledovanii vymogatel stva /E.YU. Katkova // Novyy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2017. №1. S. 100-104.
Obvinitel nyy prigovor RF ot 26.08.2015 po delu № 1-655/2015 // Dostup iz pravovy sistemy RosPravosudie .
Obvinitel nyy prigovor RF ot 17.06.2011 (nomer dela skryt) // Dostup iz pravovy sistemy RosPravosudie .
Popov, V.A. Gruppa lits, gruppa lits po predvaritel nomu sgovoru, organizovannaya gruppa i prestupnoe soobshchestvo (prestupnaya organizatsiya): sootnoshenie ponyatiy /V.A. Popov // Elektronnoe prilozhenie k Rossiyskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu. 2016. №3. S. 28.
Teplova, D. O. Ustoychivost kak dominantnyy priznak organizovannoy gruppy, sovershayushchey moshennichestva: analiz sudebnoy praktiki /D.O. // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2013. № 7. S. 64.
CHelyabova, Z.M. Problemy kvalifikatsii vymogatel stva, sovershennogo s primeneniem nasiliya: praktika pravoprimeneniya /Z.M. CHelyabova // Monitoring pravoprimeneniya. 2017. №1 (22). S. 23-24.
Bessonov, A.A. Organizovannaya gruppa kak sub ekt ugolovno-pravovoy otvetstvennosti /A.A. Bessonov // Ugolovnyy protsess. 2008. № 6. S. 11.
Katkova, E.YU. Problemnye voprosy, voznikayushchie pri rassledovanii vymogatel stva /E.YU. Katkova // Novyy yuridicheskiy vestnik. 2017. №1. S. 100-104.
Obvinitel nyy prigovor RF ot 26.08.2015 po delu № 1-655/2015 // Dostup iz pravovy sistemy RosPravosudie .
Obvinitel nyy prigovor RF ot 17.06.2011 (nomer dela skryt) // Dostup iz pravovy sistemy RosPravosudie .
Popov, V.A. Gruppa lits, gruppa lits po predvaritel nomu sgovoru, organizovannaya gruppa i prestupnoe soobshchestvo (prestupnaya organizatsiya): sootnoshenie ponyatiy /V.A. Popov // Elektronnoe prilozhenie k Rossiyskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu. 2016. №3. S. 28.
Teplova, D. O. Ustoychivost kak dominantnyy priznak organizovannoy gruppy, sovershayushchey moshennichestva: analiz sudebnoy praktiki /D.O. // Rossiyskiy sud ya. 2013. № 7. S. 64.
CHelyabova, Z.M. Problemy kvalifikatsii vymogatel stva, sovershennogo s primeneniem nasiliya: praktika pravoprimeneniya /Z.M. CHelyabova // Monitoring pravoprimeneniya. 2017. №1 (22). S. 23-24.
