The practice of countering tax evasion during globalization
( Pp. 265-271)

The publication notes that no country can cope with the problem of tax evasion alone, given the aggressive tax competition between individual countries. The article analyzes the activities of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which together with the G20 states in 2015 implements the BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) action plan to resolve the problems of deliberate erosion of taxable income. The «Multilateral Convention on the Implementation of Measures Relating to Tax Treaties to Resist Erosion of the Tax Base and the Removal of Profits from Taxation», concluded in Paris on November 24, 2016, contains concepts and terms, as well as specific legal mechanisms for solving issues of applying hybrid schemes to reduce the tax burden, prevent abuse of the provisions of agreements, resolve the issue of artificially avoiding the status of a permanent establishment and improve the dispute resolution procedure. Attention is drawn to the fact that the consequences of the proposed OECD decisions affect the fundamental aspects of the existing international tax architecture. In this regard, it is advisable to improve domestic legislation taking into account international tax law and experience in countering tax violations. It is stated that counteraction to avoidance of tax liability in the Russian Federation is not regulated by a single program document that would coordinate the activities of state bodies. Arguments are made about the need to adopt a long-term program document that defines the general goals, objectives and directions of activities in the field of countering tax evasion in the Russian Federation, as well as mechanisms, timing and indicators of their achievement.

Nikolaeva Z.A., (2020), THE PRACTICE OF COUNTERING TAX EVASION DURING GLOBALIZATION. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4 => 265-271.

Ayrapetyan L. K. Prakticheskie problemy vypolneniya rekomendatsiy Mery 2 Plana po bor be s BEPS po izmeneniyu lokal nogo zakonodatel stva // Nalogi. 2018. № 2. S. 35-41.
Arakelov S.A. Antiuklonitel nye normy v mezhdunarodnoy praktike. Novye zakonodatel nye instrumenty po bor be protiv ukloneniya ot uplaty nalogov v Rossii // Zakon. 2018. № 5. S. 109-115.
Balashova YU.G., Elokhova I.V. Problemy nalogovoy sistemy v period globalizatsii: proekt BEPS//Innovatsionnaya ekonomika i obshchestvo, 2019. № 2 (24). S. 2-6.
Bykov S.S., Frosher G. Antiuklonitel nye predpisaniya v nalogovom prave Rossii i Germanii: sravnenie opyta razresheniya kolliziy// Journal of Tax Reform. 2016. T. 2. № 1. S. 59-84.
Vinnitskiy D. V. Mezhdunarodnoe nalogovoe pravo: problemy teorii i praktiki. M.: Statut, 2017. 461 c.
Gorina G.A., Akhmadeev R.G. Transfertnoe tsenoobrazovanie i novatsii nalogovogo kontrolya // Spravochnik ekonomista. 2013. № 3 (117). S. 14-25.
Ermilova M.I., Nagornykh M.G. Analiz mezhdunarodnogo opyta regulirovaniya kontroliruemykh sdelok kompaniy// Konkurentosposobnost v global nom mire: ekonomika, nauka, tekhnologii. 2016. № 8-1 (20). S. 153-156.
Kievich A.V., Prigodich I.A., Kononchuk I.A. Transformatsiya nalogovykh sistem na primere stran-chlenov Evropeyskogo Soyuza//CHasopis ekonomichnikh reform, 2018. № 4(32). S. 30-37.
Leshchenko S. K. Mnogostoronnyaya nalogovaya konventsiya ot 7 iyunya 2017 g. i novye mekhanizmy predotvrashcheniya ukloneniya i ukhoda ot uplaty nalogov v aspekte ikh perspektivnogo primeneniya v Respublike Belarus //ZHurn. Belorus. gos. un-ta. Pravo. 2017. № 3. S. 60-74.
Ponomareva K. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie bor by so zloupotrebitel nymi nalogovymi praktikami v Evropeyskom Soyuze i Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. YUridicheskie nauki. 2019. Vyp. 45. C. 418-441.
De la Feria R. Tax Fraud and the Rule of Law/Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation Working Paper series recent papers, 2018. - 38 s
Saxunova D., Sul kova R., Szarkova R. Tax Management Hierarchy - Tax Fraud and a Fraudster/Management International Conference. Venice, Italy, 2017. S. 634-635;
Seiler M. GAAR and Judicial Anti-Avoidance in Germany, the UK and the EU/Prof. Dr.h.c. M. Lang (Editor). 2016. Vol. 98. - 374 p.;
Fleckenstein T. Perspectives on international support to DRM in IOTA countries//Improving Tax Governance, Published by IOTA, 2018. R. 39-41.
Freedman J. General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAARs) - A Key Element of Tax Systems in the Post-BEPS Tax World The UK GAAR/University of Oxford Legal Research Paper Seriest. 2016. -24 r.
Weisbach D.A. Formalism in the Tax Law//The University of Chicago Law Review. 1999. Vol. 66. № 3. P. 860-886.

tax evasion, aggressive tax planning, countering tax avoidance.