On the inextricable link between the personality of the participant and the society on the example of law enforcement practice on bringing the debtor's controlling persons to subsidiary liability
( Pp. 135-139)

More about authors
Shapsugova Marietta Damirovna kand. yurid. nauk, docent, starshiy nauchnyy sotrudnik sektora predprinimatelskogo i korporativnogo prava
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Read text
Abstract:
The purpose of the research. Bankruptcy proceedings increasingly involve not only controlling persons but also members of their families. The reason for this is the conflict of interests of the family and creditors. The development of bankruptcy legislation leads to a reduction in the possibilities of preserving the property of family members from collection under the obligations of the controlling person of the debtor. Until recently, one of these methods was the alienation of property in favor of a minor, which undoubtedly led to a violation of creditors' interests. The need to protect creditors' interests gave rise to new specific forms of lawmaking by the higher courts, in particular, bringing the children of the controlling debtor to responsibility. This decision seems to be controversial. This is the exhaustion of the theory of independent legal personality of a legal entity and the lack of a theoretical justification for the implementation of entrepreneurial activities of citizens in the form of participation (membership) in a legal entity. The article aims to identify sources of legal uncertainty in bringing the children of the controlling debtor to respond within bankruptcy procedures. The article analyzes the judicial practice in cases of bringing family members of a controlling debtor, including children, as controlling beneficiaries, to subsidiary liability for society's obligations through the prism of the conscientiousness of the exercise of parental rights and the conscientiousness of a minor. Results. It is proposed to introduce into legislation two presumptions: a refutable presumption of the conscientiousness of a parent and an irrefutable presumption of a child's good faith as a tool to save a minor from civil death through the fault of the parents.
How to Cite:
Shapsugova M.D., (2021), ON THE INEXTRICABLE LINK BETWEEN THE PERSONALITY OF THE PARTICIPANT AND THE SOCIETY ON THE EXAMPLE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE ON BRINGING THE DEBTOR'S CONTROLLING PERSONS TO SUBSIDIARY LIABILITY. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 1 => 135-139.
Reference list:
Abramov S.I. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost za dovedenie do bankrotstva: voprosy teorii i praktiki // Vestnik arbitrazhnoy praktiki. 2020. N 1. S. 81 - 90;
Batrova T.A. Mnimye sdelki kak sredstvo vyvoda aktivov // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2019. N 5. S. 3-5.
Bezhetskiy A.YU. Nedeystvitel nost mnimykh i pritvornykh sdelok: problemy teorii i praktiki: diss kand.yurid.nauk. M., 2013. 208 s.;
Belozertsev S. M. Deliktosposobnost nesovershennoletnego litsa // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. 2018. N 5. S. 184-187.
Bukshina S.V. Predvaritel noe razreshenie organa opeki i popechitel stva na rasporyazhenie imushchestvom nesovershen-noletnego // Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. N 2. S. 82-85.
Bykanov D.E. Pronikayushchaya otvetstvennost v zarubezhnom i rossiyskom korporativnom prave: Dis. kand.yurid.nauk. M., 2018. S. 18-21.
Zakharova O.E. Obkhod zakona , mnimye i pritvornye sdelki: vzaimosvyaz i otlichitel nye osobennosti // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sotsiologii. 2017. N 4. S. 163-166.
Karapetov A.G., Matvienko S.V., Moroz A.I., Safonova M.V., Fetisova E.M. Obzor pravovykh pozitsiy Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii po voprosam chastnogo prava za dekabr 2019 g. // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2020. N 2. S. 45 - 58.
Lomova E.S., TSvil V.S. Pravovoe litsemerie v kontekste prezumptsii dobrosovestnosti roditeley i prav detey na zhilishche // YUridicheskaya mysl . 2012. № 3 (71). S. 60-64.
Morkhat P.M. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost v delakh o bankrotstve kak samostoyatel naya (osnovnaya) otvetstvennost kontroliruyushchego dolzhnika litsa za narushenie obyazannosti deystvovat dobrosovestno i razumno po otnosheniyu k kreditoram podkontrol nogo litsa // Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga. 2019. N 4. S. 68 - 79.
Nevzgodina E. L. YUridicheskie posledstviya prevysheniya predelov, ustanovlennykh dlya osushchestvleniya polnomochiya predstavitelya po grazhdanskomu pravu Rossii // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriya Pravo . № 1. 2010. S. 60-67.
Saprykin K.N. Predely predstavitel stva prav i interesov rebenka // Vestnik ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti, № 2, 2014. S. 28-31;
Sergeev A.P., Tereshchenko T.A. Sdelki v obkhod zakona vs pritvornye i mnimye sdelki: otdel nye voprosy kvalifikatsii // Arbitrazhnye spory. 2015. № 2 (70). S. 132-140.
Tay YU.V., Budylin S.L. Syn za ottsa otvechaet. Subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost chlenov sem i direktora v bankrotstve kompanii // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2020. № 6. S. 4-22. Elektronnyy resurs https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/06/16 /syn za otca otvechaet C2 A0 subsidiarnaya otvetstvennost chlenov semi direktora v bankrotstve kompanii ftnref6 (data obrashcheniya 30.10.2020)
Tarasova A.E. Pravosub ektnost grazhdan: osobennosti pravosub ektnosti nesovershennoletnikh, ikh proyavleniya v grazhdanskikh pravonarusheniyakh -M.: Volters Kluver, 2008. - 303 s.;
Tolmachyeva A. A. Voprosy zakonnogo predstavitel stva nesovershennoletnikh: teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie // Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2010.N 3(15). S. 125-131.
TSvil V.S. Prezumptsiya dobrosovestnosti roditeley v sisteme garantiy konstitutsionnykh prav detey // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2010. N 11 (71). S. 32-37.
Keywords:
controller, parent's good faith, minor's good faith, right to participate.


Related Articles