Responsibility of the scientist for implementing into practice the results of some researches in the field of biotechnologies in the context of scientific ethics
( Pp. 152-159)

The article is devoted to the study of the problem of moral and ethical responsibility of a scientist in modern society, where the value imperative of science is that any new knowledge or discovery should be directed to the benefit of humanity. The author analyzes the problems of the relationship between science, as a system of knowledge and as a type of activity, with ethics. At the same time, the focus of the author's attention is also the question of the ethical and legal acceptability of the use of certain biomedical technologies on the example of technology for human cloning and growing human organs. The research used such methods of scientific knowledge as: general scientific dialectical, formal legal and comparative legal methods. At the same time, the author proceeds from the subjective-objective assignment of processes and phenomena, and their interconnection. The novelty of this study is determined by its very purpose, subject and range of sources under consideration. In this format, the author formulates the conclusion that not only moral, but also legal control, based on reasonable and compromise principles, should be exercised over the activities of a scientist. The author also found that the ethical norms contained in the national ethical codes, which are developed by scientists themselves within their professional community, are characterized by the necessary flexibility in the regulation of scientific activity.

Akhmadova M.A., (2020), RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SCIENTIST FOR IMPLEMENTING INTO PRACTICE THE RESULTS OF SOME RESEARCHES IN THE FIELD OF BIOTECHNOLOGIES IN THE CONTEXT OF SCIENTIFIC ETHICS. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, 4 => 152-159.

Agatstsi E. Nauchnaya ob ektivnost i ee konteksty /Perevod s angliyskogo Lakhuti D. G. Pod redaktsiey i s predisloviem Lektorskogo V. A. - M.: Izdatel stvo Progress-Traditsiya , 2017. - S. 614 (688 s.).
Veber M. Smysl svobody ot otsenki v sotsiologicheskoy i ekonomicheskoy nauke //Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya /Perevod s nemetskogo. Sostavlenie, obshchaya redaktsiya i posleslovie YU. N. Davydova; predislovie P. P. Gaydenko. - M.: Izdatel stvo Progress , 1990. - S.547-601.
Garanina O. Sotsial nye fobii milleniuma: nauka v obraze Frankenshteyna // Nauchnyy vestnik MGTU GA. - 2012. - № 182. - S. 40-45.
Gnatik E.N. Perspektivy chelovechestva // Vestnik RUDN, ser. Filosofiya. - 2003. - № 1 (9). - S. 112.-121.
Guryleva M.E., KHamitova G.M. Etiko-pravovye problemy klonirovaniya cheloveka // Kazanskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. - 2019. - Tom 100, № 6. - S. 992-999.
Erokhin A.K., Kovalenko S.V. - Moral naya argumentatsiya riskov ispol zovaniya nanotekhnologiy v biomeditsine // Sotsiodinamika. - 2019. - № 10. - S. 44 - 54. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2019.10.30716 URL: https://nbpublish.com/library read article.php id 30716 (data obrashcheniya: 26.07.2020 g.).
Katanyan K. Obratnaya storona klonirovaniya // NG-nauka. - 1997. - № 4. - S. 3.
Kiyashchenko L. P. Etos postneklassicheskoy nauki (k postanovke problemy) //Filosofiya nauki. Vypusk 11: Etos nauki na rubezhe vekov. - M.: Institut filosofii RAN, 2005. - S.29-53.
Kodeks etiki uchenykh i inzhenerov (Redaktsiya Rossiyskogo Soyuza nauchnykh i inzhenernykh obshchestvennykh organizatsiy). URL: http://uralecologia.ru/index.php/kodeks-etiki (data obrashcheniya: 17.07.2020).
Nekrasova N.A., Trigubenko F.A. Etika i etiket // Nauchnyy vestnik MGTU GA. - 2015. - № 215. - S. 99-104.
Pavel eva T.YU. K voprosu ob etike nauki // Sotsial no-politicheskie nauki. - 2017. - № 4. - S. 33-35.
Pervye v mire svin i s kletkami obez yan rodilis v Kitae. URL: https://www.lada.kz/another news/75307-pervye-v-mire-svini-s-kletkami-obezyan-rodilis-v-kitae.html (data obrashcheniya: 26.07.2020 g.).
Plokhaya E.E. Nauchnaya etika kak manifestatsiya printsipov tolerantnosti // Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya. - 2016. - S. 251-256.
Pribytkov K. VOZ sformirovala ekspertnyy komitet dlya otsenki posledstviy izmeneniya genov cheloveka // TASS. 2019. 15 fevralya. URL: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/6119748 (data obrashcheniya: 07.06.2020 g.).
Prigozhin A.I. Rossiyskiy etos: obogashchenie ili lechenie // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost . 2006. № 2. S. 29-41.
Rekomendatsiya o statuse nauchno-issledovatel skikh rabotnikov. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902084640 (data obrashcheniya: 25.07.2020).
Savvina O.V. Diskurs o moral noy opravdannosti i regulirovanii meditsinskikh biotekhnologiy (na primere ekstrakorporal nogo oplodotvoreniya) // Eticheskaya mysl . - 2019. - T. 19. - № 1. - S.104-117.
Tishchenko P.D. Bioeticheskoe obespechenie nauchnogo razvitiya v obshchestve riska. Rabochie tetradi po bioetike. Vyp. 11. Gumanitarnoe obespechenie innovatsionnogo razvitiya biomeditsinskikh tekhnologiy. Sb. nauch. st. Otv. red. P.D. Tishchenko. - M.: Izd-vo Mosk. gumanit. un-ta. - 2010. - S. 36
Tishchenko P.D. Bioeticheskoe obespechenie nauchnogo razvitiya v obshchestve riska. Rabochie tetradi po bioetike. Vyp. 11. Gumanitarnoe obespechenie innovatsionnogo razvitiya biomeditsinskikh tekhnologiy. Sb. nauch. st. Otv. red. P.D. Tishchenko. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. gumanit. un-ta. - 2010. - S. 36.
Uchenye iz SSHA i Ispanii sozdali embrion-khimeru cheloveka i obez yany. URL: https://ria.ru/20190731/1557040939.html (data obrashcheniya: 26.07.2020 g.).
CHerepanova M.V. Kodeks etiki nauchnogo soobshchestva: formy voploshcheniya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. - 2013. - №2 (10). - S. 41-46.
YUdin B. G. O vozmozhnosti eticheskogo izmereniya nauki // CHelovek. - 2010. - № 5. - S. 86-92.

bioethics, social responsibility of a scientist, antiscientism, science, ethics of science, scientific progress, cloning, bioprinting, ethical code, biotechnology.