ON THE CONCEPT OF LEGAL AID
( Pp. 72-77)
More about authors
Meleshko Olga Petrovna
kand. yurid. nauk, docent. Dolzhnost: zaveduyuschiy kafedroy. Podrazdelenie: kafedra istorii, prava i obschestvennyh disciplin.
Branch of Stavropol state pedagogical Institute in the city of Essentuki Kipselidi Yuri Georgievich kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Mesto raboty: Rossiyskaya Akademiya Narodnogo Hozyaystva i Gosudarstvennoy Sluzhby pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federacii. Filial: Severo - Kavkazskiy institut. Podrazdelenie: kafedra pravovogo obespecheniya organov vlasti.
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of Russian Federation.. Branch: North - Caucasus Institute
Branch of Stavropol state pedagogical Institute in the city of Essentuki Kipselidi Yuri Georgievich kand. yurid. nauk. Dolzhnost: docent. Mesto raboty: Rossiyskaya Akademiya Narodnogo Hozyaystva i Gosudarstvennoy Sluzhby pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federacii. Filial: Severo - Kavkazskiy institut. Podrazdelenie: kafedra pravovogo obespecheniya organov vlasti.
Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of Russian Federation.. Branch: North - Caucasus Institute
Abstract:
This article discusses (deals with) the concept of legal aid in the general legal theory. The Authors analyze in detail the essential and distinctive features of legal aid as a form of legal activities (parties, object, subject, aims, means, etc.), giving a holistic idea of this legal phenomenon.
How to Cite:
Meleshko O.P., Kipselidi Y.G., (2016), ON THE CONCEPT OF LEGAL AID. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 8 => 72-77.
Reference list:
Boykov A.D. Problemy advokatskoy etiki // Rol i zadachi sovetskoy advokatury. M., 1972. S. 185;
Boykov A.D. Etika professional noy zashchity po ugolovnym delam. M., 1978. S. 62;
Stetsovskiy YU.I. Sovetskaya advokatura. M., 1989. S. 249- 251;
Libus I. Okhrana prav lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse. Tashkent, 1975. S. 8, 9.
Barshchevskiy M.YU. nazyvaet etot kriteriy zakonnost yu spornogo interesa (sm.: Barshchevskiy M.YU. Advokatskaya etika. M., 2000).
Efimenko V.I. YUridicheskaya pomoshch grazhdanam i organizatsiyam: ponyatie i mesto v sisteme pravookhrany // Aktual nye problemy zakonodatel stva i pravoprimenitel noy praktiki. Sb. statey. M., 1988. № 37 457. S. 44.
Zaytsev I.M. TSeli i printsipy advokatskoy deyatel nosti/Advokatskaya deyatel nost . Materialy rossiysko-amerikanskogo seminara. Noyabr 1996 g., Saratov / Pod red. I.M. Zaytseva. Saratov, 1997. S. 5, 6.
Kachalov V.I., Kachalova O.V. YUridicheskaya pomoshch v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Skhemy i kommentarii. M., 2002. S. 3, 5.
Minyaylenko N.N. Pravo na yuridicheskuyu pomoshch i mekhanizm ego obespecheniya v sovremennoy Rossii (Teoretiko-pravovoy aspekt). Avtoref. diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2000;
Mel nichenko R.G. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na yuridicheskuyu pomoshch . Avtoref. diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2001;
Tarlo E.G. Rol advokatury v sisteme obespecheniya konstitutsionnogo prava na yuridicheskuyu pomoshch . M., 2001;
Manafov A.G. Konstitutsionnoe pravo grazhdan na kvalifitsirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomoshch v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2002;
Krasnov I.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na kvalifitsirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomoshch i ego obespechenie v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. Penza, 2003;
Smagin G.A. Konstitutsionno-pravovye voprosy okazaniya yuridicheskoy pomoshchi v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2003;
Poluyaktova N.L. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnogo prava na kvalifitsirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomoshch kak osnovnoe soderzhanie deyatel nosti notariata Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004;
Andrianov N.V. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo kak sreda institutsionalizatsii advokatury. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2005;
CHernyakov I.G. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnogo prava na kvalifitsirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomoshch v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Problemy i perspektivy. Avtoref. diss..kand. yurid. nauk. CHelyabinsk, 2007;
Lyubovenko E.S. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na poluchenie kvalifitsirovannoy yuridicheskoy pomoshchi i mekhanizm ego garantirovaniya: rossiyskiy i zarubezhnyy opyt. Diss kand. yurid. nauk. M, 2008.
Mikhaylovskaya I.B., Kuz minskaya E.F., Mazaev YU.N. YUridicheskaya pomoshch naseleniyu: potrebnosti i vozmozhnosti. M., 1995. S. 8.
Kleyn E.B. Uchastie advokata v dokazyvanii po grazhdanskim delam. Avtoref. diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 1988. S. 5, 6).
Mal ko A.V. Pravovye sredstva kak obshcheteoreticheskaya problema // Pravovedenie. 1999. № 2. S. 7-9.
Sapun V.A. Teoriya pravovykh sredstv i mekhanizm realizatsii prava. Avtoref. diss.. doktora yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2002. S. 19.
Boykov A.D. Etika professional noy zashchity po ugolovnym delam. M., 1978. S. 62;
Stetsovskiy YU.I. Sovetskaya advokatura. M., 1989. S. 249- 251;
Libus I. Okhrana prav lichnosti v ugolovnom protsesse. Tashkent, 1975. S. 8, 9.
Barshchevskiy M.YU. nazyvaet etot kriteriy zakonnost yu spornogo interesa (sm.: Barshchevskiy M.YU. Advokatskaya etika. M., 2000).
Efimenko V.I. YUridicheskaya pomoshch grazhdanam i organizatsiyam: ponyatie i mesto v sisteme pravookhrany // Aktual nye problemy zakonodatel stva i pravoprimenitel noy praktiki. Sb. statey. M., 1988. № 37 457. S. 44.
Zaytsev I.M. TSeli i printsipy advokatskoy deyatel nosti/Advokatskaya deyatel nost . Materialy rossiysko-amerikanskogo seminara. Noyabr 1996 g., Saratov / Pod red. I.M. Zaytseva. Saratov, 1997. S. 5, 6.
Kachalov V.I., Kachalova O.V. YUridicheskaya pomoshch v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Skhemy i kommentarii. M., 2002. S. 3, 5.
Minyaylenko N.N. Pravo na yuridicheskuyu pomoshch i mekhanizm ego obespecheniya v sovremennoy Rossii (Teoretiko-pravovoy aspekt). Avtoref. diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2000;
Mel nichenko R.G. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na yuridicheskuyu pomoshch . Avtoref. diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2001;
Tarlo E.G. Rol advokatury v sisteme obespecheniya konstitutsionnogo prava na yuridicheskuyu pomoshch . M., 2001;
Manafov A.G. Konstitutsionnoe pravo grazhdan na kvalifitsirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomoshch v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2002;
Krasnov I.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na kvalifitsirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomoshch i ego obespechenie v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. Penza, 2003;
Smagin G.A. Konstitutsionno-pravovye voprosy okazaniya yuridicheskoy pomoshchi v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2003;
Poluyaktova N.L. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnogo prava na kvalifitsirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomoshch kak osnovnoe soderzhanie deyatel nosti notariata Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2004;
Andrianov N.V. Grazhdanskoe obshchestvo kak sreda institutsionalizatsii advokatury. Diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2005;
CHernyakov I.G. Realizatsiya konstitutsionnogo prava na kvalifitsirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomoshch v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Problemy i perspektivy. Avtoref. diss..kand. yurid. nauk. CHelyabinsk, 2007;
Lyubovenko E.S. Konstitutsionnoe pravo na poluchenie kvalifitsirovannoy yuridicheskoy pomoshchi i mekhanizm ego garantirovaniya: rossiyskiy i zarubezhnyy opyt. Diss kand. yurid. nauk. M, 2008.
Mikhaylovskaya I.B., Kuz minskaya E.F., Mazaev YU.N. YUridicheskaya pomoshch naseleniyu: potrebnosti i vozmozhnosti. M., 1995. S. 8.
Kleyn E.B. Uchastie advokata v dokazyvanii po grazhdanskim delam. Avtoref. diss.. kand. yurid. nauk. Minsk, 1988. S. 5, 6).
Mal ko A.V. Pravovye sredstva kak obshcheteoreticheskaya problema // Pravovedenie. 1999. № 2. S. 7-9.
Sapun V.A. Teoriya pravovykh sredstv i mekhanizm realizatsii prava. Avtoref. diss.. doktora yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 2002. S. 19.
Keywords:
legal assistance, legal activity, remedies, legal assistance, General theory of law.
