THE PROBLEMS OF ROBBERIES` QUALIFICATION WITH DIFFERENT KINDS OF WEAPONS
( Pp. 150-154)

Robbery acts as one of the most dangerous forms of plunder of someone else's property, and therefore it is actively investigated by experts. At the same time there are many problems in the criminal-right assessment of the crime provided by Art. 162 of Criminal Code of Russia. As shows studying of judicial and investigative practice, many difficulties arise at qualification of the assaults committed with application of separate types of weapon. In article attention is paid to questions of qualification of robbery with use of alarm and gas weapon of electroconvulsive devices. The analysis of normative legal acts is carried out, scientific views are studied, materials of court practice concerning qualification of the designated crime are investigated. For uniform understanding of legislative rules, the solution of the problems arising at qualification of assaults with application of separate types of weapon specific proposals about updating of the legislation and a position of the supreme judicial authority, the Russian Federation stated in the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of 27.12.2002 No. 29 "About court practice on cases of theft, a robbery and robbery" are made.

Son E.V., (2017), THE PROBLEMS OF ROBBERIES` QUALIFICATION WITH DIFFERENT KINDS OF WEAPONS. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 7 => 150-154.

Ob oruzhii: Federal nyy Zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.12.1996 goda № 150-FZ (s izm. i dop.) // Rossiyskaya gazeta ot 8 iyulya 2016 g. N 149. Sm. st. 1;
O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v svyazi s realizatsiey polozheniy Federal nogo zakona O tekhnicheskom regulirovanii Federal nyy Zakon Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 19 iyulya 2011 g. № 248-FZ (red. ot 29 dekabrya 2012 g.) // Sobranie Zakonodatel stva RF, 2011. № 30. Sm. st. 22;
GOST R 50743-95. Gazovoe oruzhie samooborony. Mekhanicheskie raspyliteli, aerozol nye i drugie ustroystva, snaryazhennye slezotochivymi ili razdrazhayushchimi veshchestvami. Trebovaniya bezopasnosti. Vidy i metody kontrolya pri sertifikatsionnykh ispytaniyakh na bezopasnost (s Izmeneniem N 1, s Popravkoy) (utv. Postanovleniem Gosstandarta Rossii ot 15 fevralya 1995 g. N 55) // M.: Standartinform, 1995;
GOST R 50940-96 Ustroystva elektroshokovye. Obshchie tekhnicheskie usloviya (utv. Postanovleniem Gosstandarta Rossii ot 28 avgusta 1996 g. N 548) // M.: Standartinform, 1996;
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o khishchenii, vymogatel stve i nezakonnom oborote oruzhiya, boepripasov, vzryvchatykh veshchestv i vzryvnykh ustroystv: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 12.03.2002 g. № 5 // rossiyskaya gazeta - vypusk № 48;
O sudebnoy praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 27.12.2002 g. № 29 // Rossiyskaya gazeta - vypusk № 9;
O praktike primeneniya sudami zakonodatel stva ob otvetstvennosti za banditizm: postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 17.01.1997 g. № 1 // Rossiyskaya gazeta - Federal nyy vypusk № 20;
Arkhiv ZHeleznodorozhnogo rayonnogo suda Moskovskoy oblasti. Delo № 1-221/15 Elektronnyy resurs - rezhim dostupa: https://rospravosudie.com/court-zheleznodorozhnyj-gorodskoj-sud-moskovskaya-oblast-s/act-495932462/;
Arkhiv TSentral nogo rayonnogo suda g. CHelyabinska. Delo № 1-487/2011 Elektronnyy resurs - rezhim dostupa: https://rospravosudie.com/court-centralnyj-rajonnyj-sud-g-chelyabinska-chelyabinskaya-oblast-s/act-458030637/;
Arkhiv TSentral nogo rayonnogo suda g. Novokuznetska. Delo № 10-22/2014 Elektronnyy resurs - rezhim dostupa: https://rospravosudie.com/court-centralnyj-rajonnyj-sud-g-novokuznecka-kemerovskaya-oblast-s/act-471271212/;
Aistova A. S., Popov A. N. Kommentariy k Postanovleniyu Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii O sudebnoy praktike po ugolovnym delam o khuliganstve i inykh prestupleniyakh, sovershennykh iz khuliganskikh pobuzhdeniy ot 15 noyabrya 2007 goda № 45. 2010. S. 9;
Boytsov A. I. Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti / A. I. Boytsov. M. 2002. S. 646;
Vorob ev D. V. Razboynye posyagatel stva na pravo sobstvennosti // Publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. Vyp. № 2. 2009. S. 146;
Katbambetov M. I. Ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika primeneniya oruzhiya. Dis.. kand. yurid. nauk / M. 2013. S. 20;
Koretskiy D. A. Oruzhie kak element ugolovno-pravovoy kharakteristiki prestupleniya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2003. N 3. S. 34;
Koretskiy D. A., Solonitskaya E. V. Oruzhie i ego nezakonnyy oborot. Spb. 2006. S. 69;
Kurs rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava. Osobennaya chast / pod red. V. N. Kudryavtseva i A. V. Naumova. M. 2002. S. 358;
Kushniryk V.V. Oborot elektroshokovykh ustroystv i iskrovykh razryadnikov. Administrativno-pravovye aspekty i perspektivy prakticheskogo ispol zovaniya // Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 75-letiyu Zasluzhennogo yurista Rossiyskoy Federatsii M.YA. Maslennikova. M. 2011. S. 190;
Romankov A. Primenenie oruzhiya ili predmetov, ispol zuemykh v kachestve oruzhiya, kak kvalifitsiruyushchiy priznak razboya // Ugolovnoe pravo. 2002. № 1. S. 45;
Sudebno-meditsinskaya kharakteristika porazheniy, prichinennykh iz sredstv samooborony, snaryazhennykh irritantom dibenzoksazepinom (veshchestvom CR). Diss. kand. med. nauk / Tolmachev S. I. Moskva. 2015. S. 14.

robbery, weapon, stun gun, gas cartridge, signal weapons.